{"title":"学位就是学位?精英大学对提供学位的大学的影响","authors":"Leesa Wheelahan, Gavin Moodie","doi":"10.1080/14480220.2020.1830837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The provision of bachelor degrees in technical and further education (TAFE) institutes in Australia, further education (FE) colleges in England, and community colleges (CCs) in Canada and the United States is caught in a contradiction. On the one hand, this provision offers opportunities to groups of students who are not having their needs met in universities (Floyd & Falconetti, 2013; Moodie et al., 2019; Webb et al., 2017; Wheelahan et al., 2009). On the other hand, the emergence of this provision over the last twenty years is part of the further stratification and hierarchical structuring of higher education in those countries (Bathmaker, 2016; Wheelahan, 2016). This prologue argues that TAFE, FE and CCs are kept firmly in their place at the bottom of the higher education hierarchy in their respective countries. While the provision of degrees in colleges seems to offer ‘college for all’ and to reflect and support democratic impulses and social justice objectives in liberal democracies, its location in the sectoral hierarchy means that this provision helps to reproduce social inequality. This contradiction reflects the ‘messiness and complexity’ of HE in FE (or TAFE or CCs) identified by Avis and Orr (2016, p. 61) because while it cannot alter existing structures of disadvantage, it can and does transform lives of individual students by providing them with access to the kind of knowledge they need to be citizens in their occupations and in society.","PeriodicalId":56351,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Training Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"101 - 105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14480220.2020.1830837","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A degree is a degree? The impact of elite universities on colleges offering degrees\",\"authors\":\"Leesa Wheelahan, Gavin Moodie\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14480220.2020.1830837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The provision of bachelor degrees in technical and further education (TAFE) institutes in Australia, further education (FE) colleges in England, and community colleges (CCs) in Canada and the United States is caught in a contradiction. On the one hand, this provision offers opportunities to groups of students who are not having their needs met in universities (Floyd & Falconetti, 2013; Moodie et al., 2019; Webb et al., 2017; Wheelahan et al., 2009). On the other hand, the emergence of this provision over the last twenty years is part of the further stratification and hierarchical structuring of higher education in those countries (Bathmaker, 2016; Wheelahan, 2016). This prologue argues that TAFE, FE and CCs are kept firmly in their place at the bottom of the higher education hierarchy in their respective countries. While the provision of degrees in colleges seems to offer ‘college for all’ and to reflect and support democratic impulses and social justice objectives in liberal democracies, its location in the sectoral hierarchy means that this provision helps to reproduce social inequality. This contradiction reflects the ‘messiness and complexity’ of HE in FE (or TAFE or CCs) identified by Avis and Orr (2016, p. 61) because while it cannot alter existing structures of disadvantage, it can and does transform lives of individual students by providing them with access to the kind of knowledge they need to be citizens in their occupations and in society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Training Research\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"101 - 105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14480220.2020.1830837\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Training Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2020.1830837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Training Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2020.1830837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
在澳大利亚的技术和继续教育学院(TAFE)、英国的继续教育学院(FE)以及加拿大和美国的社区学院(cc)提供学士学位存在矛盾。一方面,这一规定为那些在大学里没有得到需求满足的学生群体提供了机会(Floyd & Falconetti, 2013;穆迪等人,2019;Webb et al., 2017;Wheelahan et al., 2009)。另一方面,在过去二十年中,这一规定的出现是这些国家高等教育进一步分层和分层结构的一部分(Bathmaker, 2016;Wheelahan, 2016)。这篇序言认为,TAFE、FE和cc在各自国家的高等教育体系中始终处于最底层。虽然大学学位的提供似乎提供了“全民大学”,并反映和支持自由民主国家的民主冲动和社会正义目标,但其在部门等级制度中的位置意味着这一规定有助于再现社会不平等。这种矛盾反映了Avis和Orr(2016,第61页)所确定的高等教育在高等教育(或TAFE或CCs)中的“混乱和复杂性”,因为虽然它不能改变现有的劣势结构,但它可以并且确实通过向学生提供他们在职业和社会中成为公民所需的那种知识来改变他们的生活。
A degree is a degree? The impact of elite universities on colleges offering degrees
The provision of bachelor degrees in technical and further education (TAFE) institutes in Australia, further education (FE) colleges in England, and community colleges (CCs) in Canada and the United States is caught in a contradiction. On the one hand, this provision offers opportunities to groups of students who are not having their needs met in universities (Floyd & Falconetti, 2013; Moodie et al., 2019; Webb et al., 2017; Wheelahan et al., 2009). On the other hand, the emergence of this provision over the last twenty years is part of the further stratification and hierarchical structuring of higher education in those countries (Bathmaker, 2016; Wheelahan, 2016). This prologue argues that TAFE, FE and CCs are kept firmly in their place at the bottom of the higher education hierarchy in their respective countries. While the provision of degrees in colleges seems to offer ‘college for all’ and to reflect and support democratic impulses and social justice objectives in liberal democracies, its location in the sectoral hierarchy means that this provision helps to reproduce social inequality. This contradiction reflects the ‘messiness and complexity’ of HE in FE (or TAFE or CCs) identified by Avis and Orr (2016, p. 61) because while it cannot alter existing structures of disadvantage, it can and does transform lives of individual students by providing them with access to the kind of knowledge they need to be citizens in their occupations and in society.