亚洲及太平洋地区的公民社会与劳工权利保护

IF 1.4 4区社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES

Pacific Affairs Pub Date : 2020-03-01 DOI:10.5509/202093189

Dongwook Kim, Chong-ki Choi

{"title":"亚洲及太平洋地区的公民社会与劳工权利保护","authors":"Dongwook Kim, Chong-ki Choi","doi":"10.5509/202093189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Why do some national governments in Asia and the Pacific protect labour rights better in practice than others? This article argues that labour rights are better protected in Asia-Pacific countries where civil society organizations participate more intensively in the government's policy-making\n process. It goes beyond treating regime type in the aggregate and demonstrates that the associational dimension of regime type plays a critical role in shaping government protection of labour rights in Asia and the Pacific. Multivariate longitudinal analyses of all 30 Asia-Pacific countries\n from 1981 to 2011 find robust support for the theory, using new data on civil society participation, and controlling for electoral democracy, trade openness, economic development, unobserved country-level heterogeneity, and other factors.","PeriodicalId":47041,"journal":{"name":"Pacific Affairs","volume":"93 1","pages":"89-112"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Civil Society and Labour Rights Protection in Asia and the Pacific\",\"authors\":\"Dongwook Kim, Chong-ki Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.5509/202093189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Why do some national governments in Asia and the Pacific protect labour rights better in practice than others? This article argues that labour rights are better protected in Asia-Pacific countries where civil society organizations participate more intensively in the government's policy-making\\n process. It goes beyond treating regime type in the aggregate and demonstrates that the associational dimension of regime type plays a critical role in shaping government protection of labour rights in Asia and the Pacific. Multivariate longitudinal analyses of all 30 Asia-Pacific countries\\n from 1981 to 2011 find robust support for the theory, using new data on civil society participation, and controlling for electoral democracy, trade openness, economic development, unobserved country-level heterogeneity, and other factors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pacific Affairs\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"89-112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pacific Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5509/202093189\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pacific Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5509/202093189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

为什么亚太地区的一些国家政府在实践中比其他国家更好地保护劳工权利？这篇文章认为，亚太国家的劳工权利得到了更好的保护，这些国家的民间社会组织更积极地参与政府的决策过程。它超越了对制度类型的总体处理，并表明制度类型的关联维度在塑造亚太地区政府对劳工权利的保护方面发挥着关键作用。从1981年到2011年，对所有30个亚太国家进行的多变量纵向分析发现，利用公民社会参与的新数据，以及对选举民主、贸易开放、经济发展、未观察到的国家层面异质性和其他因素的控制，有力地支持了这一理论。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Civil Society and Labour Rights Protection in Asia and the Pacific

Why do some national governments in Asia and the Pacific protect labour rights better in practice than others? This article argues that labour rights are better protected in Asia-Pacific countries where civil society organizations participate more intensively in the government's policy-making process. It goes beyond treating regime type in the aggregate and demonstrates that the associational dimension of regime type plays a critical role in shaping government protection of labour rights in Asia and the Pacific. Multivariate longitudinal analyses of all 30 Asia-Pacific countries from 1981 to 2011 find robust support for the theory, using new data on civil society participation, and controlling for electoral democracy, trade openness, economic development, unobserved country-level heterogeneity, and other factors.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Pacific Affairs AREA STUDIES-

CiteScore

1.60

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Pacific Affairs has, over the years, celebrated and fostered a community of scholars and people active in the life of Asia and the Pacific. It has published scholarly articles of contemporary significance on Asia and the Pacific since 1928. Its initial incarnation from 1926 to 1928 was as a newsletter for the Institute of Pacific Relations (IPR), but since May 1928, it has been published continuously as a quarterly under the same name. The IPR was a collaborative organization established in 1925 by leaders from several YMCA branches in the Asia Pacific, to “study the conditions of the Pacific people with a view to the improvement of their mutual relations.”