中国天才项目的公众形象——中国天才教育新闻报道38年分析

Q3 Social Sciences
Sheng-Peng Huang, Yani Kong, Yinghong Cheng
{"title":"中国天才项目的公众形象——中国天才教育新闻报道38年分析","authors":"Sheng-Peng Huang, Yani Kong, Yinghong Cheng","doi":"10.1080/15332276.2019.1609343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Gifted programs are an indispensable component of gifted education, and have drawn much academic attention in the recent years. However, the public images of such programs are still under-examined. In this study, we employed semantic network analysis and content analysis to uncover the public images of gifted programs in China and their change over time. Based on 1,486 Chinese news reports between 1978-2015 on gifted education, our analysis revealed four different images of gifted programs and their participants in China: “successful graduates”, “early ripe, early rot”, “superb intelligence”, and “all-around development”. The co-existence of two common stereotypes, “the chosen ones” and “Mad genius”, can be concluded from the emerging process of these four images and the correlations between them. In addition, the rise and fall of different images show how the public opinions of gifted programs change over time, influenced by both institutional interventions and culture shifts. The change over time is indicative of the social-constructive nature of public opinions towards gifted education.","PeriodicalId":52310,"journal":{"name":"Gifted and Talented International","volume":"33 1","pages":"41 - 51"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15332276.2019.1609343","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public images of gifted programs in China: A 38-year analysis of Chinese news reports on gifted education\",\"authors\":\"Sheng-Peng Huang, Yani Kong, Yinghong Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15332276.2019.1609343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Gifted programs are an indispensable component of gifted education, and have drawn much academic attention in the recent years. However, the public images of such programs are still under-examined. In this study, we employed semantic network analysis and content analysis to uncover the public images of gifted programs in China and their change over time. Based on 1,486 Chinese news reports between 1978-2015 on gifted education, our analysis revealed four different images of gifted programs and their participants in China: “successful graduates”, “early ripe, early rot”, “superb intelligence”, and “all-around development”. The co-existence of two common stereotypes, “the chosen ones” and “Mad genius”, can be concluded from the emerging process of these four images and the correlations between them. In addition, the rise and fall of different images show how the public opinions of gifted programs change over time, influenced by both institutional interventions and culture shifts. The change over time is indicative of the social-constructive nature of public opinions towards gifted education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gifted and Talented International\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"41 - 51\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/15332276.2019.1609343\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gifted and Talented International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2019.1609343\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gifted and Talented International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15332276.2019.1609343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

资优项目是资优教育不可缺少的组成部分,近年来引起了学术界的广泛关注。然而,这类节目的公众形象仍未得到充分审视。在本研究中,我们运用语义网络分析和内容分析来揭示中国资优项目的公众形象及其随时间的变化。基于1978年至2015年间1486篇关于资优教育的中国新闻报道,我们的分析揭示了中国资优项目及其参与者的四种不同形象:“成功毕业生”、“早熟、早烂”、“卓越智力”和“全面发展”。从这四个形象的产生过程以及它们之间的关联可以得出“天选之子”和“疯狂天才”这两种常见刻板印象的共存。此外,不同图像的兴衰表明,受制度干预和文化转变的影响,公众对天才项目的看法是如何随着时间而变化的。随着时间的推移,这种变化表明了公众对天才教育的看法具有社会建设性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public images of gifted programs in China: A 38-year analysis of Chinese news reports on gifted education
Abstract Gifted programs are an indispensable component of gifted education, and have drawn much academic attention in the recent years. However, the public images of such programs are still under-examined. In this study, we employed semantic network analysis and content analysis to uncover the public images of gifted programs in China and their change over time. Based on 1,486 Chinese news reports between 1978-2015 on gifted education, our analysis revealed four different images of gifted programs and their participants in China: “successful graduates”, “early ripe, early rot”, “superb intelligence”, and “all-around development”. The co-existence of two common stereotypes, “the chosen ones” and “Mad genius”, can be concluded from the emerging process of these four images and the correlations between them. In addition, the rise and fall of different images show how the public opinions of gifted programs change over time, influenced by both institutional interventions and culture shifts. The change over time is indicative of the social-constructive nature of public opinions towards gifted education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gifted and Talented International
Gifted and Talented International Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信