新冠肺炎期间的扫盲诊所:展望未来的声音

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Barbara Laster, M. Butler, Rachael Waller, Sheri Vasinda, M. Hoch, Pelusa Orellana, Joan A. Rhodes, Theresa Deeney, D. B. Scott, T. Gallagher, Leslie M. Cavendish, Tammy M. Milby, R. Rogers, Tracy Johnson, S. Msengi, Cheryl L. Dozier, Shelly Huggins, Debra J. Gurvitz
{"title":"新冠肺炎期间的扫盲诊所:展望未来的声音","authors":"Barbara Laster, M. Butler, Rachael Waller, Sheri Vasinda, M. Hoch, Pelusa Orellana, Joan A. Rhodes, Theresa Deeney, D. B. Scott, T. Gallagher, Leslie M. Cavendish, Tammy M. Milby, R. Rogers, Tracy Johnson, S. Msengi, Cheryl L. Dozier, Shelly Huggins, Debra J. Gurvitz","doi":"10.1080/19388071.2022.2134064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The resiliency of literacy clinics was tested during 2020–2021, as many pivoted from in-person (F2F) to online or 3-way remote learning because of the COVID-19 pandemic. University-based literacy clinics advance teacher education, provide services to K-12 students who may need instructional support, and are a laboratory for research. The purpose of the study was to examine modifications in literacy instruction and assessment as a consequence of the changes in modality. Participants (n = 58) were literacy clinic directors/instructors from multiple states and countries. Data were analyzed in three phases: researchers individually coded; multiple teams cross-checked; a macro team collated across themes. Alterations during the pandemic involved place, time, types of texts, innovative instructional tools, and new ways of operationalizing literacy assessment and instruction. Some clinics used technology to transform instruction and innovate, while for others the goal was to replicate existing practices. Teachers, students in the context of their families, and teacher educators demonstrated resiliency, resourcefulness, and creativity in the face of interruptions and stress. Findings, viewed through the lens of the TPACK framework, can help us understand how transformations in instruction and assessment affect literacy learning not only in the context of clinics, but in school classrooms as well.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Literacy Clinics During COVID-19: Voices that Envision the Future\",\"authors\":\"Barbara Laster, M. Butler, Rachael Waller, Sheri Vasinda, M. Hoch, Pelusa Orellana, Joan A. Rhodes, Theresa Deeney, D. B. Scott, T. Gallagher, Leslie M. Cavendish, Tammy M. Milby, R. Rogers, Tracy Johnson, S. Msengi, Cheryl L. Dozier, Shelly Huggins, Debra J. Gurvitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19388071.2022.2134064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The resiliency of literacy clinics was tested during 2020–2021, as many pivoted from in-person (F2F) to online or 3-way remote learning because of the COVID-19 pandemic. University-based literacy clinics advance teacher education, provide services to K-12 students who may need instructional support, and are a laboratory for research. The purpose of the study was to examine modifications in literacy instruction and assessment as a consequence of the changes in modality. Participants (n = 58) were literacy clinic directors/instructors from multiple states and countries. Data were analyzed in three phases: researchers individually coded; multiple teams cross-checked; a macro team collated across themes. Alterations during the pandemic involved place, time, types of texts, innovative instructional tools, and new ways of operationalizing literacy assessment and instruction. Some clinics used technology to transform instruction and innovate, while for others the goal was to replicate existing practices. Teachers, students in the context of their families, and teacher educators demonstrated resiliency, resourcefulness, and creativity in the face of interruptions and stress. Findings, viewed through the lens of the TPACK framework, can help us understand how transformations in instruction and assessment affect literacy learning not only in the context of clinics, but in school classrooms as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2022.2134064\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2022.2134064","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要由于新冠肺炎大流行,许多扫盲诊所从住院(F2F)转向在线或三向远程学习,因此在2020年至2021年期间对扫盲诊所的弹性进行了测试。大学扫盲诊所促进教师教育,为可能需要教学支持的K-12学生提供服务,是研究的实验室。这项研究的目的是考察识字教学和评估因模式变化而发生的变化。参与者(n=58)是来自多个州和国家的扫盲诊所主任/讲师。数据分三个阶段进行分析:研究人员单独编码;多个团队交叉检查;一个宏观团队对各个主题进行了整理。疫情期间的变化涉及地点、时间、文本类型、创新的教学工具以及实施识字评估和教学的新方法。一些诊所使用技术来改变教学和创新,而另一些诊所的目标是复制现有的做法。教师、家庭背景下的学生和教师教育工作者在面对干扰和压力时表现出了韧性、足智多谋和创造力。从TPACK框架的角度来看,研究结果可以帮助我们了解教学和评估的转变如何影响识字学习,不仅在诊所的背景下,而且在学校课堂上也是如此。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Literacy Clinics During COVID-19: Voices that Envision the Future
ABSTRACT The resiliency of literacy clinics was tested during 2020–2021, as many pivoted from in-person (F2F) to online or 3-way remote learning because of the COVID-19 pandemic. University-based literacy clinics advance teacher education, provide services to K-12 students who may need instructional support, and are a laboratory for research. The purpose of the study was to examine modifications in literacy instruction and assessment as a consequence of the changes in modality. Participants (n = 58) were literacy clinic directors/instructors from multiple states and countries. Data were analyzed in three phases: researchers individually coded; multiple teams cross-checked; a macro team collated across themes. Alterations during the pandemic involved place, time, types of texts, innovative instructional tools, and new ways of operationalizing literacy assessment and instruction. Some clinics used technology to transform instruction and innovate, while for others the goal was to replicate existing practices. Teachers, students in the context of their families, and teacher educators demonstrated resiliency, resourcefulness, and creativity in the face of interruptions and stress. Findings, viewed through the lens of the TPACK framework, can help us understand how transformations in instruction and assessment affect literacy learning not only in the context of clinics, but in school classrooms as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信