弱势群体劳动力市场政策的社会投资视角

IF 0.5 Q4 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
Ides Nicasie
{"title":"弱势群体劳动力市场政策的社会投资视角","authors":"Ides Nicasie","doi":"10.5209/crla.71081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article conceptualises the notion of “social investment’ within the context of social protection and active labour market policies. This paradigm is confronted to the neoliberal ‘making work pay’ paradigm and the conservative workfare doctrine build on the idea that a stronger work ethos needs to be inculcated through reduced rights and more duties. The social investment paradigm advocates generous social protection combined with enabling investments and is thus perfectly congruent with social inclusion objectives. The empirical analysis shows remarkably small effects of both types of policies in the past 15 years: ALMPs have had small positive effects on employment, but also on exits into inactivity. The most positive employment effect of ALMPs is a redistribution of employment opportunities towards older, female and less educated groups. The Re-inVEST research analyses in-depth participatory case studies of policies targeting disadvantaged groups in different European countries, using an ‘enriched’ social investment model, building on a human rights and capabilities approach. The findings indeed show very wide differences in quality – and a lot of room for improvement. In order to improve their effectiveness as well as inclusiveness, the right to decent ALMPs should be put on the policy agenda.","PeriodicalId":43568,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A social investment perspective on labour market policies for vulnerable groups\",\"authors\":\"Ides Nicasie\",\"doi\":\"10.5209/crla.71081\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article conceptualises the notion of “social investment’ within the context of social protection and active labour market policies. This paradigm is confronted to the neoliberal ‘making work pay’ paradigm and the conservative workfare doctrine build on the idea that a stronger work ethos needs to be inculcated through reduced rights and more duties. The social investment paradigm advocates generous social protection combined with enabling investments and is thus perfectly congruent with social inclusion objectives. The empirical analysis shows remarkably small effects of both types of policies in the past 15 years: ALMPs have had small positive effects on employment, but also on exits into inactivity. The most positive employment effect of ALMPs is a redistribution of employment opportunities towards older, female and less educated groups. The Re-inVEST research analyses in-depth participatory case studies of policies targeting disadvantaged groups in different European countries, using an ‘enriched’ social investment model, building on a human rights and capabilities approach. The findings indeed show very wide differences in quality – and a lot of room for improvement. In order to improve their effectiveness as well as inclusiveness, the right to decent ALMPs should be put on the policy agenda.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5209/crla.71081\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/crla.71081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章对在社会保护和积极的劳动力市场政策背景下的“社会投资”。这一范式与新自由主义的“让工作有报酬”范式以及基于需要通过减少权利和增加义务来灌输更强大的工作精神这一理念的保守劳动保护主义相对抗。社会投资范式主张将慷慨的社会保护结合起来与扶持性投资相结合,因此与社会包容目标完全一致。实证分析显示,在过去15年中,这两种类型的政策的影响都非常小:ALMP对就业产生了很小的积极影响,但也对退出不活跃状态产生了影响。ALMP最积极的就业效果是将就业机会重新分配给老年人、女性和受教育程度较低的群体。Re-inVEST的研究分析了针对不同欧洲国家弱势群体的政策的深入参与性案例研究,使用了“丰富”的社会投资模式,以人权和能力方法为基础。研究结果确实显示了质量上的巨大差异,还有很大的改进空间。为了提高其有效性和包容性,体面的ALMP权利应列入政策议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A social investment perspective on labour market policies for vulnerable groups
This article conceptualises the notion of “social investment’ within the context of social protection and active labour market policies. This paradigm is confronted to the neoliberal ‘making work pay’ paradigm and the conservative workfare doctrine build on the idea that a stronger work ethos needs to be inculcated through reduced rights and more duties. The social investment paradigm advocates generous social protection combined with enabling investments and is thus perfectly congruent with social inclusion objectives. The empirical analysis shows remarkably small effects of both types of policies in the past 15 years: ALMPs have had small positive effects on employment, but also on exits into inactivity. The most positive employment effect of ALMPs is a redistribution of employment opportunities towards older, female and less educated groups. The Re-inVEST research analyses in-depth participatory case studies of policies targeting disadvantaged groups in different European countries, using an ‘enriched’ social investment model, building on a human rights and capabilities approach. The findings indeed show very wide differences in quality – and a lot of room for improvement. In order to improve their effectiveness as well as inclusiveness, the right to decent ALMPs should be put on the policy agenda.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales
Cuadernos de Relaciones Laborales INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信