Corey Peltier, Kimberly J. Vannest, Kristi L. Morin, Tracy E. Sinclair, M. Sallese
{"title":"教师干预对改善情绪与行为障碍学生数学成绩的系统评价","authors":"Corey Peltier, Kimberly J. Vannest, Kristi L. Morin, Tracy E. Sinclair, M. Sallese","doi":"10.1080/09362835.2020.1771717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) demonstrate poor academic outcomes, particularly in mathematics. Student-mediated interventions (e.g., self-management, self-monitoring, self-instruction) are replete in the intervention literature base for students with EBD. However, teacher-mediated interventions have been examined less frequently. The goal of this project was to examine the literature on teacher-mediated interventions to improve the mathematical performance of students with EBD to identify what is known and gaps that need to be filled. A total of 17 studies including 47 students met inclusion criteria; however, only seven studies including 17 students met the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Pilot Single-Case Design Standards with or without reservations. Using the WWC Evidence Standards, six studies demonstrated moderate evidence of effect and one study demonstrated weak evidence. The omnibus Tau-U was 72% (CI95 62–82%), representing data from the seven studies that met the WWC Design Standards. We calculated the between-case standardized mean difference (BC-SMD) for four studies that met assumptions; the effect sizes ranged from 3.48 to 0.45. Implications for research and practice are discussed.","PeriodicalId":46668,"journal":{"name":"Exceptionality","volume":"28 1","pages":"121 - 141"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09362835.2020.1771717","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of Teacher-Mediated Interventions to Improve the Mathematical Performance of Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders\",\"authors\":\"Corey Peltier, Kimberly J. Vannest, Kristi L. Morin, Tracy E. Sinclair, M. Sallese\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09362835.2020.1771717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) demonstrate poor academic outcomes, particularly in mathematics. Student-mediated interventions (e.g., self-management, self-monitoring, self-instruction) are replete in the intervention literature base for students with EBD. However, teacher-mediated interventions have been examined less frequently. The goal of this project was to examine the literature on teacher-mediated interventions to improve the mathematical performance of students with EBD to identify what is known and gaps that need to be filled. A total of 17 studies including 47 students met inclusion criteria; however, only seven studies including 17 students met the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Pilot Single-Case Design Standards with or without reservations. Using the WWC Evidence Standards, six studies demonstrated moderate evidence of effect and one study demonstrated weak evidence. The omnibus Tau-U was 72% (CI95 62–82%), representing data from the seven studies that met the WWC Design Standards. We calculated the between-case standardized mean difference (BC-SMD) for four studies that met assumptions; the effect sizes ranged from 3.48 to 0.45. Implications for research and practice are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exceptionality\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"121 - 141\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09362835.2020.1771717\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exceptionality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1771717\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptionality","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1771717","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9
摘要
患有情绪和行为障碍(EBD)的学生表现出较差的学业成绩,特别是在数学方面。以学生为中介的干预措施(如自我管理、自我监控、自我指导)在EBD学生干预文献库中非常丰富。然而,教师介导的干预很少被检查。这个项目的目的是检查关于教师干预的文献,以提高EBD学生的数学表现,以确定已知的和需要填补的空白。共有17项研究包括47名学生符合纳入标准;然而,只有7项研究,包括17名学生,有保留地或没有保留地达到了What Works Clearinghouse (WWC)试点单一案例设计标准。根据世界卫生组织的证据标准,六项研究显示了中等程度的证据,一项研究显示了弱证据。综合Tau-U为72% (CI95 62-82%),代表了符合WWC设计标准的七项研究的数据。我们计算了四项符合假设的研究的病例间标准化平均差(BC-SMD);效应量为3.48 ~ 0.45。讨论了对研究和实践的启示。
A Systematic Review of Teacher-Mediated Interventions to Improve the Mathematical Performance of Students with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
ABSTRACT Students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) demonstrate poor academic outcomes, particularly in mathematics. Student-mediated interventions (e.g., self-management, self-monitoring, self-instruction) are replete in the intervention literature base for students with EBD. However, teacher-mediated interventions have been examined less frequently. The goal of this project was to examine the literature on teacher-mediated interventions to improve the mathematical performance of students with EBD to identify what is known and gaps that need to be filled. A total of 17 studies including 47 students met inclusion criteria; however, only seven studies including 17 students met the What Works Clearinghouse (WWC) Pilot Single-Case Design Standards with or without reservations. Using the WWC Evidence Standards, six studies demonstrated moderate evidence of effect and one study demonstrated weak evidence. The omnibus Tau-U was 72% (CI95 62–82%), representing data from the seven studies that met the WWC Design Standards. We calculated the between-case standardized mean difference (BC-SMD) for four studies that met assumptions; the effect sizes ranged from 3.48 to 0.45. Implications for research and practice are discussed.