公私混合体价值产生和获取的轨迹:医疗保健多层次治理机制

IF 4.9 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT
G. Cappellaro, Amelia Compagni, M. Dacin
{"title":"公私混合体价值产生和获取的轨迹:医疗保健多层次治理机制","authors":"G. Cappellaro, Amelia Compagni, M. Dacin","doi":"10.1177/01708406231187084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our paper unpacks the multi-level process through which hybrids generate value in the long term. By combining interviews, archival and survey data, we examine the longitudinal trajectories of value generation of public-private hybrids (PPHs) established in the regionalized Italian healthcare system (1992-2018). We identify three ideal-type trajectories: a) long-term value generation by stable PPHs; b) long-term value generation by transient PPHs; and c) interrupted value generation by terminated PPHs. We uncover how these trajectories are shaped by the interplay between regional governance arrangements – i.e., institutionally embedded norms regarding who is entitled to generate value for the field, the scope for organizational value capturing and the institutional monitoring system – and organizational governance mechanisms – i.e., the strategic orientation of individual PPHs and their internal monitoring functions. Our paper contributes to theory by conceptualizing the mechanism of “double filter”, which we define as the set of field- and organizational-level governance compensatory mechanisms that, together, allow long-term value generation by hybrids. We also problematize the relationship between hybrids’ value-generation capacities and the persistence of hybrid organizational forms, and ultimately trace it to different field governance arrangements. In so doing, we conceptualize “transient hybrids” as a distinctive organizational form for long-term value generation.","PeriodicalId":48423,"journal":{"name":"Organization Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trajectories of value generation and capturing by public-private hybrids: Mechanisms of multi-level governance in healthcare\",\"authors\":\"G. Cappellaro, Amelia Compagni, M. Dacin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01708406231187084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our paper unpacks the multi-level process through which hybrids generate value in the long term. By combining interviews, archival and survey data, we examine the longitudinal trajectories of value generation of public-private hybrids (PPHs) established in the regionalized Italian healthcare system (1992-2018). We identify three ideal-type trajectories: a) long-term value generation by stable PPHs; b) long-term value generation by transient PPHs; and c) interrupted value generation by terminated PPHs. We uncover how these trajectories are shaped by the interplay between regional governance arrangements – i.e., institutionally embedded norms regarding who is entitled to generate value for the field, the scope for organizational value capturing and the institutional monitoring system – and organizational governance mechanisms – i.e., the strategic orientation of individual PPHs and their internal monitoring functions. Our paper contributes to theory by conceptualizing the mechanism of “double filter”, which we define as the set of field- and organizational-level governance compensatory mechanisms that, together, allow long-term value generation by hybrids. We also problematize the relationship between hybrids’ value-generation capacities and the persistence of hybrid organizational forms, and ultimately trace it to different field governance arrangements. In so doing, we conceptualize “transient hybrids” as a distinctive organizational form for long-term value generation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organization Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organization Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231187084\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231187084","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的论文揭示了混合动力汽车长期产生价值的多层次过程。通过结合访谈、档案和调查数据,我们研究了在区域化的意大利医疗系统(1992-2018)中建立的公私混合体(PPH)价值产生的纵向轨迹。我们确定了三种理想类型的轨迹:a)通过稳定的PPH产生长期价值;b) 瞬态PPH产生的长期价值;以及c)由终止的PPH中断的值生成。我们揭示了这些轨迹是如何由区域治理安排和组织治理机制之间的相互作用形成的,区域治理安排即关于谁有权为该领域创造价值的制度嵌入规范、组织价值捕获的范围和制度监督系统。,个人PPH的战略定位及其内部监控功能。我们的论文通过概念化“双重过滤”机制为理论做出了贡献,我们将其定义为一组领域和组织层面的治理补偿机制,这些机制共同允许混合体长期产生价值。我们还对混合型组织的价值生成能力与混合型组织形式的持久性之间的关系提出了问题,并最终将其追溯到不同的领域治理安排。在这样做的过程中,我们将“瞬态混合体”概念化为一种独特的组织形式,用于长期价值产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trajectories of value generation and capturing by public-private hybrids: Mechanisms of multi-level governance in healthcare
Our paper unpacks the multi-level process through which hybrids generate value in the long term. By combining interviews, archival and survey data, we examine the longitudinal trajectories of value generation of public-private hybrids (PPHs) established in the regionalized Italian healthcare system (1992-2018). We identify three ideal-type trajectories: a) long-term value generation by stable PPHs; b) long-term value generation by transient PPHs; and c) interrupted value generation by terminated PPHs. We uncover how these trajectories are shaped by the interplay between regional governance arrangements – i.e., institutionally embedded norms regarding who is entitled to generate value for the field, the scope for organizational value capturing and the institutional monitoring system – and organizational governance mechanisms – i.e., the strategic orientation of individual PPHs and their internal monitoring functions. Our paper contributes to theory by conceptualizing the mechanism of “double filter”, which we define as the set of field- and organizational-level governance compensatory mechanisms that, together, allow long-term value generation by hybrids. We also problematize the relationship between hybrids’ value-generation capacities and the persistence of hybrid organizational forms, and ultimately trace it to different field governance arrangements. In so doing, we conceptualize “transient hybrids” as a distinctive organizational form for long-term value generation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Organization Studies
Organization Studies MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Organisation Studies (OS) aims to promote the understanding of organizations, organizing and the organized, and the social relevance of that understanding. It encourages the interplay between theorizing and empirical research, in the belief that they should be mutually informative. It is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal which is open to contributions of high quality, from any perspective relevant to the field and from any country. Organization Studies is, in particular, a supranational journal which gives special attention to national and cultural similarities and differences worldwide. This is reflected by its international editorial board and publisher and its collaboration with EGOS, the European Group for Organizational Studies. OS publishes papers that fully or partly draw on empirical data to make their contribution to organization theory and practice. Thus, OS welcomes work that in any form draws on empirical work to make strong theoretical and empirical contributions. If your paper is not drawing on empirical data in any form, we advise you to submit your work to Organization Theory – another journal under the auspices of the European Group for Organizational Studies (EGOS) – instead.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信