{"title":"主动为随机测试建立模型的过程-基于案例研究洞察学习者的建模活动","authors":"Susanne Podworny, Rolf Biehler","doi":"10.1080/10986065.2021.1922837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Inferential reasoning is an integral part of science and civic society, but research shows that it is a problematic domain for many people. One possibility for a more accessible approach to inferential reasoning is to use randomization tests via computer simulations. A case study was conducted with primary preservice teachers after they had passed a course module that introduced inferential reasoning with randomization tests. The study examines how three pairs of primary preservice teachers construct models in a randomization test task with both hands-on and computer-supported components. Our findings suggest that there is a common sequence in the model building process: planning, modeling the random assignment, setting sample size and replacement, and running the simulation. Our findings show in depth how TinkerPlots can be a supportive and constraining medium in the modeling process, building on experiences with physical simulations of a randomization test. These insights can be used for redesigning technology-supported learning trajectories for randomization tests. Together with other case studies our findings provide a good sense of university students’ modeling processes.","PeriodicalId":46800,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Thinking and Learning","volume":"24 1","pages":"291 - 311"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10986065.2021.1922837","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The process of actively building a model for a randomization test – insights into learners’ modeling activities based on a case study\",\"authors\":\"Susanne Podworny, Rolf Biehler\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10986065.2021.1922837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Inferential reasoning is an integral part of science and civic society, but research shows that it is a problematic domain for many people. One possibility for a more accessible approach to inferential reasoning is to use randomization tests via computer simulations. A case study was conducted with primary preservice teachers after they had passed a course module that introduced inferential reasoning with randomization tests. The study examines how three pairs of primary preservice teachers construct models in a randomization test task with both hands-on and computer-supported components. Our findings suggest that there is a common sequence in the model building process: planning, modeling the random assignment, setting sample size and replacement, and running the simulation. Our findings show in depth how TinkerPlots can be a supportive and constraining medium in the modeling process, building on experiences with physical simulations of a randomization test. These insights can be used for redesigning technology-supported learning trajectories for randomization tests. Together with other case studies our findings provide a good sense of university students’ modeling processes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mathematical Thinking and Learning\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"291 - 311\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10986065.2021.1922837\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mathematical Thinking and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.1922837\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Thinking and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.1922837","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
The process of actively building a model for a randomization test – insights into learners’ modeling activities based on a case study
ABSTRACT Inferential reasoning is an integral part of science and civic society, but research shows that it is a problematic domain for many people. One possibility for a more accessible approach to inferential reasoning is to use randomization tests via computer simulations. A case study was conducted with primary preservice teachers after they had passed a course module that introduced inferential reasoning with randomization tests. The study examines how three pairs of primary preservice teachers construct models in a randomization test task with both hands-on and computer-supported components. Our findings suggest that there is a common sequence in the model building process: planning, modeling the random assignment, setting sample size and replacement, and running the simulation. Our findings show in depth how TinkerPlots can be a supportive and constraining medium in the modeling process, building on experiences with physical simulations of a randomization test. These insights can be used for redesigning technology-supported learning trajectories for randomization tests. Together with other case studies our findings provide a good sense of university students’ modeling processes.