比较具体与虚拟教学方法在中学残疾学生代数教学中的应用

IF 0.6 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Erin K. Bone, Emily C. Bouck, Rajiv Satsangi
{"title":"比较具体与虚拟教学方法在中学残疾学生代数教学中的应用","authors":"Erin K. Bone, Emily C. Bouck, Rajiv Satsangi","doi":"10.1080/09362835.2021.1938057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Manipulatives are an effective mathematical tool to support students with disabilities in the area of mathematics. Yet, there remain inconsistencies in terms of which type – concrete or virtual – is more effective for students with disabilities working on algebra related content and which type is preferred by students. The researchers used an alternating treatment single case research design to compare the effectiveness of each type of manipulative in terms of students’ accuracy and independence when using the tools. Results indicate both types of manipulatives were effective in terms of accuracy no notable differences when comparing independence. However, when reviewing social validity interview data, all three students preferred virtual algebra tiles.","PeriodicalId":46668,"journal":{"name":"Exceptionality","volume":"31 1","pages":"1 - 17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09362835.2021.1938057","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Concrete and Virtual Manipulatives to Teach Algebra to Middle School Students with Disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Erin K. Bone, Emily C. Bouck, Rajiv Satsangi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09362835.2021.1938057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Manipulatives are an effective mathematical tool to support students with disabilities in the area of mathematics. Yet, there remain inconsistencies in terms of which type – concrete or virtual – is more effective for students with disabilities working on algebra related content and which type is preferred by students. The researchers used an alternating treatment single case research design to compare the effectiveness of each type of manipulative in terms of students’ accuracy and independence when using the tools. Results indicate both types of manipulatives were effective in terms of accuracy no notable differences when comparing independence. However, when reviewing social validity interview data, all three students preferred virtual algebra tiles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exceptionality\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09362835.2021.1938057\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exceptionality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2021.1938057\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptionality","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2021.1938057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要操纵是在数学领域支持残疾学生的有效数学工具。然而,在哪种类型——具体的还是虚拟的——对学习代数相关内容的残疾学生更有效,以及学生更喜欢哪种类型方面,仍然存在不一致。研究人员使用交替治疗单案例研究设计,从学生使用工具的准确性和独立性方面比较了每种类型的操作的有效性。结果表明,两种类型的操作在准确性方面都是有效的,在比较独立性时没有显著差异。然而,在回顾社会有效性访谈数据时,三名学生都更喜欢虚拟代数瓦片。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Concrete and Virtual Manipulatives to Teach Algebra to Middle School Students with Disabilities
ABSTRACT Manipulatives are an effective mathematical tool to support students with disabilities in the area of mathematics. Yet, there remain inconsistencies in terms of which type – concrete or virtual – is more effective for students with disabilities working on algebra related content and which type is preferred by students. The researchers used an alternating treatment single case research design to compare the effectiveness of each type of manipulative in terms of students’ accuracy and independence when using the tools. Results indicate both types of manipulatives were effective in terms of accuracy no notable differences when comparing independence. However, when reviewing social validity interview data, all three students preferred virtual algebra tiles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Exceptionality
Exceptionality EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信