Martin A. Simon, Daniela Della Volpe, Arundhati Velamur
{"title":"通过计数构建基数原则:批判与猜想","authors":"Martin A. Simon, Daniela Della Volpe, Arundhati Velamur","doi":"10.1080/10986065.2021.2012737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Development of the cardinality principle, an understanding that the last number-word recited in counting a collection of items specifies the number of items in that collection, is a critical milestone in developing a concept of number. Researchers in early number development have endeavored to theorize its development. Here we critique two widely respected hypotheses that explain cardinality-principle development as building on young learners’ ability to subitize small numbers. These hypotheses consider subitizing to be the basis of cardinality-principle development. We argue that there is a qualitative and significant difference between subitizing and the cardinality principle and that the explanation provided are insufficient to account for a change of this magnitude. We then propose a conjecture intended to better explain this change. The conjecture describes counting as the medium for a series of reflective abstractions leading to the cardinality principle.","PeriodicalId":46800,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Thinking and Learning","volume":"25 1","pages":"465 - 480"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Construction of the cardinality principle through counting: critique and conjecture\",\"authors\":\"Martin A. Simon, Daniela Della Volpe, Arundhati Velamur\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10986065.2021.2012737\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Development of the cardinality principle, an understanding that the last number-word recited in counting a collection of items specifies the number of items in that collection, is a critical milestone in developing a concept of number. Researchers in early number development have endeavored to theorize its development. Here we critique two widely respected hypotheses that explain cardinality-principle development as building on young learners’ ability to subitize small numbers. These hypotheses consider subitizing to be the basis of cardinality-principle development. We argue that there is a qualitative and significant difference between subitizing and the cardinality principle and that the explanation provided are insufficient to account for a change of this magnitude. We then propose a conjecture intended to better explain this change. The conjecture describes counting as the medium for a series of reflective abstractions leading to the cardinality principle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mathematical Thinking and Learning\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"465 - 480\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mathematical Thinking and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.2012737\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Thinking and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2021.2012737","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
Construction of the cardinality principle through counting: critique and conjecture
ABSTRACT Development of the cardinality principle, an understanding that the last number-word recited in counting a collection of items specifies the number of items in that collection, is a critical milestone in developing a concept of number. Researchers in early number development have endeavored to theorize its development. Here we critique two widely respected hypotheses that explain cardinality-principle development as building on young learners’ ability to subitize small numbers. These hypotheses consider subitizing to be the basis of cardinality-principle development. We argue that there is a qualitative and significant difference between subitizing and the cardinality principle and that the explanation provided are insufficient to account for a change of this magnitude. We then propose a conjecture intended to better explain this change. The conjecture describes counting as the medium for a series of reflective abstractions leading to the cardinality principle.