主管工作之外的边界侵犯:换位思考作为下班后入侵的资源

IF 5.6 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED
Jacob McCartney, J. Franczak, Katerina Gonzalez, A. Hall, Wayne A. Hochwarter, Samantha L. Jordan, Wajda Wikhamn, A. Khan, Mayowa T. Babalola
{"title":"主管工作之外的边界侵犯:换位思考作为下班后入侵的资源","authors":"Jacob McCartney, J. Franczak, Katerina Gonzalez, A. Hall, Wayne A. Hochwarter, Samantha L. Jordan, Wajda Wikhamn, A. Khan, Mayowa T. Babalola","doi":"10.1080/02678373.2023.2176945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Constant connectivity is prevalent in modern workplaces, aided by smartphones and email. Supervisors may further pressure their subordinates to remain connected to work through their after-hours communications. We develop the concept of supervisor off-work boundary infringements (SBI) or supervisor intrusions during subordinates’ nonwork hours, which are becoming widespread due to expectations of immediate accessibility. Through the conservation of resources theory lens, we explore whether these unnecessary intrusions by supervisors increase subordinate strain outcomes (i.e. job tension and depressed mood at work). We also examine the role of perspective-taking, a cognitive resource deployed as a coping strategy that allows individuals to understand the viewpoint of others, which in turn facilitates changes in one’s attitudes and behaviours. Specifically, we propose that employee perspective-taking can lessen the adverse effects of SBI. Across a four-study constructive replication, we find evidence that SBI positively relates to job tension and a depressed mood at work. Heightened levels of perspective-taking attenuated this relationship. Our study presents evidence that individuals who engage in perspective-taking can protect themselves by buffering the adverse effects of SBI. Importantly, we advocate for corporate policies and laws that protect workers from SBI and encourage supervisors to cease such infringements on their employees.","PeriodicalId":48199,"journal":{"name":"Work and Stress","volume":"37 1","pages":"373 - 396"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supervisor off-work boundary infringements: Perspective-taking as a resource for after-hours intrusions\",\"authors\":\"Jacob McCartney, J. Franczak, Katerina Gonzalez, A. Hall, Wayne A. Hochwarter, Samantha L. Jordan, Wajda Wikhamn, A. Khan, Mayowa T. Babalola\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02678373.2023.2176945\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Constant connectivity is prevalent in modern workplaces, aided by smartphones and email. Supervisors may further pressure their subordinates to remain connected to work through their after-hours communications. We develop the concept of supervisor off-work boundary infringements (SBI) or supervisor intrusions during subordinates’ nonwork hours, which are becoming widespread due to expectations of immediate accessibility. Through the conservation of resources theory lens, we explore whether these unnecessary intrusions by supervisors increase subordinate strain outcomes (i.e. job tension and depressed mood at work). We also examine the role of perspective-taking, a cognitive resource deployed as a coping strategy that allows individuals to understand the viewpoint of others, which in turn facilitates changes in one’s attitudes and behaviours. Specifically, we propose that employee perspective-taking can lessen the adverse effects of SBI. Across a four-study constructive replication, we find evidence that SBI positively relates to job tension and a depressed mood at work. Heightened levels of perspective-taking attenuated this relationship. Our study presents evidence that individuals who engage in perspective-taking can protect themselves by buffering the adverse effects of SBI. Importantly, we advocate for corporate policies and laws that protect workers from SBI and encourage supervisors to cease such infringements on their employees.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Work and Stress\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"373 - 396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Work and Stress\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2023.2176945\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Work and Stress","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2023.2176945","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在智能手机和电子邮件的帮助下,现代工作场所普遍存在持续的网络连接。主管可能会进一步向下属施压,要求他们通过下班后的交流与工作保持联系。我们提出了主管下班边界侵权(SBI)或主管在下属非工作时间的侵入的概念,由于期望立即访问而变得越来越普遍。通过资源守恒理论的视角,我们探讨管理者的这些不必要的干扰是否会增加下属的压力结果(即工作紧张和工作抑郁情绪)。我们还研究了换位思考的作用,换位思考是一种认知资源,作为一种应对策略,可以让个人理解他人的观点,从而促进个人态度和行为的改变。具体而言,我们提出员工换位思考可以减轻SBI的不利影响。通过四项研究的建设性复制,我们发现了SBI与工作紧张和工作抑郁情绪正相关的证据。换位思考能力的提高削弱了这种关系。我们的研究提供的证据表明,参与换位思考的个体可以通过缓冲SBI的不利影响来保护自己。重要的是,我们提倡公司政策和法律保护工人免受SBI,并鼓励主管停止对员工的此类侵权行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supervisor off-work boundary infringements: Perspective-taking as a resource for after-hours intrusions
ABSTRACT Constant connectivity is prevalent in modern workplaces, aided by smartphones and email. Supervisors may further pressure their subordinates to remain connected to work through their after-hours communications. We develop the concept of supervisor off-work boundary infringements (SBI) or supervisor intrusions during subordinates’ nonwork hours, which are becoming widespread due to expectations of immediate accessibility. Through the conservation of resources theory lens, we explore whether these unnecessary intrusions by supervisors increase subordinate strain outcomes (i.e. job tension and depressed mood at work). We also examine the role of perspective-taking, a cognitive resource deployed as a coping strategy that allows individuals to understand the viewpoint of others, which in turn facilitates changes in one’s attitudes and behaviours. Specifically, we propose that employee perspective-taking can lessen the adverse effects of SBI. Across a four-study constructive replication, we find evidence that SBI positively relates to job tension and a depressed mood at work. Heightened levels of perspective-taking attenuated this relationship. Our study presents evidence that individuals who engage in perspective-taking can protect themselves by buffering the adverse effects of SBI. Importantly, we advocate for corporate policies and laws that protect workers from SBI and encourage supervisors to cease such infringements on their employees.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Work and Stress
Work and Stress PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Work & Stress is an international, multidisciplinary quarterly presenting high-quality papers concerned with the psychological, social and organizational aspects of occupational health and well-being, and stress and safety management. It is published in association with the European Academy of Occupational Health Psychology. The journal publishes empirical reports, scholarly reviews and theoretical papers. It is directed at occupational health psychologists, work and organizational psychologists, those involved with organizational development, and all concerned with the interplay of work, health and organisations. Research published in Work & Stress relates psychologically salient features of the work environment to their psychological, behavioural and health consequences, focusing on the underlying psychological processes. The journal has become a natural home for research on the work-family interface, social relations at work (including topics such as bullying and conflict at work, leadership and organizational support), workplace interventions and reorganizations, and dimensions and outcomes of worker stress and well-being. Such dimensions and outcomes, both positive and negative, include stress, burnout, sickness absence, work motivation, work engagement and work performance. Of course, submissions addressing other topics in occupational health psychology are also welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信