英语教师反思实践量表的编制与验证

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Masoomeh Estaji, Javad Ahmadi Fatalaki
{"title":"英语教师反思实践量表的编制与验证","authors":"Masoomeh Estaji, Javad Ahmadi Fatalaki","doi":"10.1080/14623943.2023.2210068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study was aimed at devising and validating a questionnaire on EFL teachers’ perceptions of reflective practice. To this end, seven experts in the field of Applied Linguistics were invited to check the face and content validity of the questionnaire with a checklist. They were also asked to rate the questionnaire items on a 5- point Likert scale. Based on the experts’ viewpoints (removing 3 items and making some revisions on 8 items) and the review of the relevant literature on teacher reflective practice, 45 items were selected and maintained for the initial scale. To validate the instrument, entailing 45 items, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA) were used. Based on the EFA results, 3 items were removed from the scale due to their ineffective loading on the factors and scree plot indicated that 5 factors (interpersonal, intrapersonal, critical, behavioral, and strategic) had acceptable eigenvalue that corresponded to the tentative model. The result of CFA also reduced the scale to 33 items. This validated instrument can be used to determine EFL teachers’ attempts to be reflective and their perceptions of reflective practice.","PeriodicalId":51594,"journal":{"name":"Reflective Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and validation of teacher reflective practice scale for EFL teachers\",\"authors\":\"Masoomeh Estaji, Javad Ahmadi Fatalaki\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14623943.2023.2210068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study was aimed at devising and validating a questionnaire on EFL teachers’ perceptions of reflective practice. To this end, seven experts in the field of Applied Linguistics were invited to check the face and content validity of the questionnaire with a checklist. They were also asked to rate the questionnaire items on a 5- point Likert scale. Based on the experts’ viewpoints (removing 3 items and making some revisions on 8 items) and the review of the relevant literature on teacher reflective practice, 45 items were selected and maintained for the initial scale. To validate the instrument, entailing 45 items, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA) were used. Based on the EFA results, 3 items were removed from the scale due to their ineffective loading on the factors and scree plot indicated that 5 factors (interpersonal, intrapersonal, critical, behavioral, and strategic) had acceptable eigenvalue that corresponded to the tentative model. The result of CFA also reduced the scale to 33 items. This validated instrument can be used to determine EFL teachers’ attempts to be reflective and their perceptions of reflective practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reflective Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reflective Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2023.2210068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reflective Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2023.2210068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在设计并验证一份关于英语教师反思实践认知的问卷。为此,邀请了七位应用语言学领域的专家,用一份检查表来检查问卷的表面和内容的有效性。他们还被要求对问卷项目进行5分的Likert量表评分。根据专家的观点(删除了3个项目,对8个项目进行了一些修订),并回顾了有关教师反思实践的相关文献,选择并保留了45个项目作为初始量表。为了验证该工具,共有45个项目,使用了探索性和验证性因素分析(EFA、CFA)。基于EFA结果,有3个项目因其对因素的无效加载而从量表中删除,并且标绘图表明,5个因素(人际、个人、批判性、行为和策略)具有可接受的特征值,与暂定模型相对应。CFA的结果还将比额表减少到33个项目。这个经过验证的工具可以用来确定EFL教师的反思尝试和他们对反思实践的看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and validation of teacher reflective practice scale for EFL teachers
ABSTRACT This study was aimed at devising and validating a questionnaire on EFL teachers’ perceptions of reflective practice. To this end, seven experts in the field of Applied Linguistics were invited to check the face and content validity of the questionnaire with a checklist. They were also asked to rate the questionnaire items on a 5- point Likert scale. Based on the experts’ viewpoints (removing 3 items and making some revisions on 8 items) and the review of the relevant literature on teacher reflective practice, 45 items were selected and maintained for the initial scale. To validate the instrument, entailing 45 items, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses (EFA, CFA) were used. Based on the EFA results, 3 items were removed from the scale due to their ineffective loading on the factors and scree plot indicated that 5 factors (interpersonal, intrapersonal, critical, behavioral, and strategic) had acceptable eigenvalue that corresponded to the tentative model. The result of CFA also reduced the scale to 33 items. This validated instrument can be used to determine EFL teachers’ attempts to be reflective and their perceptions of reflective practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reflective Practice
Reflective Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信