了解有语言和阅读理解困难的学生阅读困难的性质和严重程度

IF 2.1 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Philip Capin, Sandra L. Gillam, Anna-Maria Fall, Gregory Roberts, Jordan T. Dille, Ronald B. Gillam
{"title":"了解有语言和阅读理解困难的学生阅读困难的性质和严重程度","authors":"Philip Capin,&nbsp;Sandra L. Gillam,&nbsp;Anna-Maria Fall,&nbsp;Gregory Roberts,&nbsp;Jordan T. Dille,&nbsp;Ronald B. Gillam","doi":"10.1007/s11881-022-00255-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h2>Abstract\n</h2><div><p>This study investigated the presence of word reading difficulties in a sample of students in Grades 1–4 (<i>n</i> = 357) identified with language and reading comprehension difficulties. This study also examined whether distinct word reading and listening comprehension profiles emerged within this sample and the extent to which these groups varied in performance on cognitive and demographic variables. Findings showed that the majority of students (51%) with language and reading comprehension difficulties demonstrated significant risk in word reading (more than 1 SD below the mean), even though the participant screening procedures did not examine word reading directly. Three latent profiles emerged when students were classified into subgroups based on their performance in listening comprehension (LC) and word reading (WR): (1) severe difficulties in LC and moderate difficulties in WR (11%), (2) mild difficulties in both LC and WR (50%), and (3) moderate difficulties in LC and mild difficulties in WR (39%). Of note, even though students were identified for participation on the basis of poor oral language and reading comprehension abilities, all profiles demonstrated some degree of word reading difficulties. Findings revealed there were differences in age and performance on measures of working memory, nonverbal reasoning, and reading comprehension performance between profiles. Implications for educators providing instruction to students with or at risk for dyslexia and developmental language disorders were discussed.</p></div></div>","PeriodicalId":47273,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Dyslexia","volume":"72 2","pages":"249 - 275"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding the nature and severity of reading difficulties among students with language and reading comprehension difficulties\",\"authors\":\"Philip Capin,&nbsp;Sandra L. Gillam,&nbsp;Anna-Maria Fall,&nbsp;Gregory Roberts,&nbsp;Jordan T. Dille,&nbsp;Ronald B. Gillam\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11881-022-00255-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h2>Abstract\\n</h2><div><p>This study investigated the presence of word reading difficulties in a sample of students in Grades 1–4 (<i>n</i> = 357) identified with language and reading comprehension difficulties. This study also examined whether distinct word reading and listening comprehension profiles emerged within this sample and the extent to which these groups varied in performance on cognitive and demographic variables. Findings showed that the majority of students (51%) with language and reading comprehension difficulties demonstrated significant risk in word reading (more than 1 SD below the mean), even though the participant screening procedures did not examine word reading directly. Three latent profiles emerged when students were classified into subgroups based on their performance in listening comprehension (LC) and word reading (WR): (1) severe difficulties in LC and moderate difficulties in WR (11%), (2) mild difficulties in both LC and WR (50%), and (3) moderate difficulties in LC and mild difficulties in WR (39%). Of note, even though students were identified for participation on the basis of poor oral language and reading comprehension abilities, all profiles demonstrated some degree of word reading difficulties. Findings revealed there were differences in age and performance on measures of working memory, nonverbal reasoning, and reading comprehension performance between profiles. Implications for educators providing instruction to students with or at risk for dyslexia and developmental language disorders were discussed.</p></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Dyslexia\",\"volume\":\"72 2\",\"pages\":\"249 - 275\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Dyslexia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-022-00255-3\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Dyslexia","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11881-022-00255-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要本研究调查了1-4年级(n = 357)被鉴定为语言和阅读理解困难。这项研究还考察了该样本中是否出现了不同的单词阅读和听力理解特征,以及这些群体在认知和人口统计学变量方面的表现差异程度。研究结果显示,大多数有语言和阅读理解困难的学生(51%)在单词阅读方面表现出显著的风险(比平均值低1 SD以上),尽管参与者筛选程序没有直接检查单词阅读。当根据学生在听力理解(LC)和单词阅读(WR)方面的表现将他们分为亚组时,出现了三种潜在的情况:(1)LC的严重困难和WR的中度困难(11%),(2)LC和WR的轻度困难(50%),以及(3)LC的中度困难和WR(39%)。值得注意的是,尽管学生的参与是基于较差的口语和阅读理解能力,但所有档案都显示出一定程度的单词阅读困难。研究结果显示,不同档案在工作记忆、非语言推理和阅读理解表现方面的年龄和表现存在差异。讨论了教育工作者为有阅读障碍和发展性语言障碍或有阅读障碍风险的学生提供指导的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Understanding the nature and severity of reading difficulties among students with language and reading comprehension difficulties

Understanding the nature and severity of reading difficulties among students with language and reading comprehension difficulties

Abstract

This study investigated the presence of word reading difficulties in a sample of students in Grades 1–4 (n = 357) identified with language and reading comprehension difficulties. This study also examined whether distinct word reading and listening comprehension profiles emerged within this sample and the extent to which these groups varied in performance on cognitive and demographic variables. Findings showed that the majority of students (51%) with language and reading comprehension difficulties demonstrated significant risk in word reading (more than 1 SD below the mean), even though the participant screening procedures did not examine word reading directly. Three latent profiles emerged when students were classified into subgroups based on their performance in listening comprehension (LC) and word reading (WR): (1) severe difficulties in LC and moderate difficulties in WR (11%), (2) mild difficulties in both LC and WR (50%), and (3) moderate difficulties in LC and mild difficulties in WR (39%). Of note, even though students were identified for participation on the basis of poor oral language and reading comprehension abilities, all profiles demonstrated some degree of word reading difficulties. Findings revealed there were differences in age and performance on measures of working memory, nonverbal reasoning, and reading comprehension performance between profiles. Implications for educators providing instruction to students with or at risk for dyslexia and developmental language disorders were discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Dyslexia
Annals of Dyslexia Multiple-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
8.70%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: Annals of Dyslexia is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the scientific study of dyslexia, its comorbid conditions; and theory-based practices on remediation, and intervention of dyslexia and related areas of written language disorders including spelling, composing and mathematics. Primary consideration for publication is given to original empirical studies, significant review, and well-documented reports of evidence-based effective practices. Only original papers are considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信