{"title":"加标点,还是不加标点?语法和韵律对成人逗号使用判断的影响","authors":"Nenagh Kemp, R. Treiman","doi":"10.1080/10888438.2023.2194539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Purpose Punctuation is traditionally seen to represent grammatical structures in writing, but some authors argue that it can also reflect the intonation and pauses of speech. In two experiments, we examined the influence of grammar and prosody on adults’ judgments of comma placement. Method University students rated the appropriateness of commas in various sentence structures. These included sentences in which the subject and verb were disrupted by a comma. These commas were ungrammatical, but prosodically appropriate, in that they marked where a slight pause could naturally occur in speech. Results In Experiment 1, 192 students rated ungrammatical commas as more appropriate if they occurred at prosodic pause points than at no-pause points. In Experiment 2, 235 students rated prosodically appropriate commas as more appropriate if they were also grammatical than if they were not. Overall, participants with better written language skills distinguished more between grammatical and ungrammatical commas, but acceptance of prosodically appropriate commas occurred across levels of written language skill. Conclusion Literate adults use prosody, as well as grammar, to judge the appropriateness of comma use. These findings have implications for theories of punctuation, and can inform debate on students’ and teachers’ treatment of punctuation.","PeriodicalId":48032,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Studies of Reading","volume":"27 1","pages":"443 - 450"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"To Punctuate, or Not to Punctuate? Grammatical and Prosodic Influences on Adults’ Judgments of Comma Use\",\"authors\":\"Nenagh Kemp, R. Treiman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10888438.2023.2194539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Purpose Punctuation is traditionally seen to represent grammatical structures in writing, but some authors argue that it can also reflect the intonation and pauses of speech. In two experiments, we examined the influence of grammar and prosody on adults’ judgments of comma placement. Method University students rated the appropriateness of commas in various sentence structures. These included sentences in which the subject and verb were disrupted by a comma. These commas were ungrammatical, but prosodically appropriate, in that they marked where a slight pause could naturally occur in speech. Results In Experiment 1, 192 students rated ungrammatical commas as more appropriate if they occurred at prosodic pause points than at no-pause points. In Experiment 2, 235 students rated prosodically appropriate commas as more appropriate if they were also grammatical than if they were not. Overall, participants with better written language skills distinguished more between grammatical and ungrammatical commas, but acceptance of prosodically appropriate commas occurred across levels of written language skill. Conclusion Literate adults use prosody, as well as grammar, to judge the appropriateness of comma use. These findings have implications for theories of punctuation, and can inform debate on students’ and teachers’ treatment of punctuation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Studies of Reading\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"443 - 450\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Studies of Reading\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2023.2194539\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Studies of Reading","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2023.2194539","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
To Punctuate, or Not to Punctuate? Grammatical and Prosodic Influences on Adults’ Judgments of Comma Use
ABSTRACT Purpose Punctuation is traditionally seen to represent grammatical structures in writing, but some authors argue that it can also reflect the intonation and pauses of speech. In two experiments, we examined the influence of grammar and prosody on adults’ judgments of comma placement. Method University students rated the appropriateness of commas in various sentence structures. These included sentences in which the subject and verb were disrupted by a comma. These commas were ungrammatical, but prosodically appropriate, in that they marked where a slight pause could naturally occur in speech. Results In Experiment 1, 192 students rated ungrammatical commas as more appropriate if they occurred at prosodic pause points than at no-pause points. In Experiment 2, 235 students rated prosodically appropriate commas as more appropriate if they were also grammatical than if they were not. Overall, participants with better written language skills distinguished more between grammatical and ungrammatical commas, but acceptance of prosodically appropriate commas occurred across levels of written language skill. Conclusion Literate adults use prosody, as well as grammar, to judge the appropriateness of comma use. These findings have implications for theories of punctuation, and can inform debate on students’ and teachers’ treatment of punctuation.
期刊介绍:
This journal publishes original empirical investigations dealing with all aspects of reading and its related areas, and, occasionally, scholarly reviews of the literature, papers focused on theory development, and discussions of social policy issues. Papers range from very basic studies to those whose main thrust is toward educational practice. The journal also includes work on "all aspects of reading and its related areas," a phrase that is sufficiently general to encompass issues related to word recognition, comprehension, writing, intervention, and assessment involving very young children and/or adults.