M. Sannathimmappa, Vinod Nambiar, R. Aravindakshan, Elham S Al-Risi
{"title":"粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌的临床特征和抗生素敏感性,重点是万古霉素耐药性","authors":"M. Sannathimmappa, Vinod Nambiar, R. Aravindakshan, Elham S Al-Risi","doi":"10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_38_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Enterococci are recognized as an important nosocomial opportunistic pathogens in recent times and are difficult to treat due to their intrinsic and acquired resistance to many antibiotics. In this study, we analyzed the clinical profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern with an emphasis on vancomycin resistance among Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolated from various clinical samples. Methods: This retrospective study was carried out in Sohar Hospital, Oman, after obtaining an ethical approval from the Ministry of Health, Oman. Enterococci isolates identified as E. faecalis and E. faecium from the positive bacterial culture in patients' suspicion of bacterial infection during the study period from January 2017 to December 2021 were analyzed. Details of the study population such as demography, clinical samples, and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the enterococci isolates were extracted from the hospital electronic health record system. The data were entered into Microsoft Excel sheet, cleaned for errors, and statistically analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26. The quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation while qualitative variables presented as frequencies. Results: In total, 132 nonduplicate E. faecalis and E. faecium were studied. E. faecalis (68.9%) was the predominantly isolated species followed by E. faecium (31.1%). The frequency of isolation was more among females (54.5%) and elderly (47.7%) aged more than 60 years. Majority of enterococci were isolated from urine (49.6%), followed by blood (29.1%) and pus/wound swab (11.8%). All isolates were susceptible to linezolid, while all isolates showed resistance to clindamycin. None of the E. faecalis isolates exhibited resistance to vancomycin, while 13.5% of E. faecium isolates were resistant to vancomycin. E. faecium showed higher resistance to beta lactams, ciprofloxacin, and nitrofurantoin (>80%), while E. faecalis demonstrated low resistance to beta-lactams and nitrofurantoin (<10%). Conclusions: Linezolid and vancomycin were effective against Enterococci causing nosocomial infection in our tertiary care hospital. However, continuous and frequent surveillance for resistance patterns is critical for judicious and evidence-based use of antibiotics.","PeriodicalId":36500,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"283 - 287"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium with an emphasis on vancomycin resistance\",\"authors\":\"M. Sannathimmappa, Vinod Nambiar, R. Aravindakshan, Elham S Al-Risi\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_38_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Enterococci are recognized as an important nosocomial opportunistic pathogens in recent times and are difficult to treat due to their intrinsic and acquired resistance to many antibiotics. In this study, we analyzed the clinical profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern with an emphasis on vancomycin resistance among Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolated from various clinical samples. Methods: This retrospective study was carried out in Sohar Hospital, Oman, after obtaining an ethical approval from the Ministry of Health, Oman. Enterococci isolates identified as E. faecalis and E. faecium from the positive bacterial culture in patients' suspicion of bacterial infection during the study period from January 2017 to December 2021 were analyzed. Details of the study population such as demography, clinical samples, and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the enterococci isolates were extracted from the hospital electronic health record system. The data were entered into Microsoft Excel sheet, cleaned for errors, and statistically analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26. The quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation while qualitative variables presented as frequencies. Results: In total, 132 nonduplicate E. faecalis and E. faecium were studied. E. faecalis (68.9%) was the predominantly isolated species followed by E. faecium (31.1%). The frequency of isolation was more among females (54.5%) and elderly (47.7%) aged more than 60 years. Majority of enterococci were isolated from urine (49.6%), followed by blood (29.1%) and pus/wound swab (11.8%). All isolates were susceptible to linezolid, while all isolates showed resistance to clindamycin. None of the E. faecalis isolates exhibited resistance to vancomycin, while 13.5% of E. faecium isolates were resistant to vancomycin. E. faecium showed higher resistance to beta lactams, ciprofloxacin, and nitrofurantoin (>80%), while E. faecalis demonstrated low resistance to beta-lactams and nitrofurantoin (<10%). Conclusions: Linezolid and vancomycin were effective against Enterococci causing nosocomial infection in our tertiary care hospital. However, continuous and frequent surveillance for resistance patterns is critical for judicious and evidence-based use of antibiotics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"283 - 287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_38_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_38_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肠球菌是近年来公认的重要的医院条件致病菌,由于其对许多抗生素具有内在和获得性耐药,使其难以治疗。在本研究中,我们分析了从不同临床样本中分离的粪肠球菌和屎肠球菌的临床概况和抗生素药敏模式,重点研究了它们对万古霉素的耐药性。方法:在获得阿曼卫生部的伦理批准后,本回顾性研究在阿曼Sohar医院进行。分析2017年1月至2021年12月研究期间疑似细菌感染患者细菌培养阳性肠球菌中分离到的粪肠球菌和粪肠球菌。从医院电子健康记录系统中提取研究人群的详细信息,如人口统计学、临床样本和分离肠球菌的抗生素敏感性模式。将数据输入到Microsoft Excel表格中,清除错误,并使用SPSS (Statistical Package for The Social Sciences)版本26进行统计分析。定量变量以均数±标准差表示,定性变量以频率表示。结果:共检出粪肠杆菌和粪肠杆菌132株。主要分离种为粪肠球菌(68.9%),其次为粪肠球菌(31.1%)。女性(54.5%)和60岁以上老年人(47.7%)的分离率较高。大多数肠球菌来自尿液(49.6%),其次是血液(29.1%)和脓液/伤口拭子(11.8%)。所有分离株对利奈唑胺敏感,对克林霉素耐药。所有粪肠球菌对万古霉素均无耐药性,但有13.5%的粪肠球菌对万古霉素有耐药性。粪肠杆菌对-内酰胺类、环丙沙星和呋喃妥因的耐药性较高(≤80%),而粪肠杆菌对-内酰胺类和呋喃妥因的耐药性较低(<10%)。结论:利奈唑胺和万古霉素对三级医院肠球菌感染有较好的治疗效果。然而,持续和频繁地监测耐药模式对于明智和循证使用抗生素至关重要。
Clinical profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium with an emphasis on vancomycin resistance
Background: Enterococci are recognized as an important nosocomial opportunistic pathogens in recent times and are difficult to treat due to their intrinsic and acquired resistance to many antibiotics. In this study, we analyzed the clinical profile and antibiotic susceptibility pattern with an emphasis on vancomycin resistance among Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolated from various clinical samples. Methods: This retrospective study was carried out in Sohar Hospital, Oman, after obtaining an ethical approval from the Ministry of Health, Oman. Enterococci isolates identified as E. faecalis and E. faecium from the positive bacterial culture in patients' suspicion of bacterial infection during the study period from January 2017 to December 2021 were analyzed. Details of the study population such as demography, clinical samples, and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the enterococci isolates were extracted from the hospital electronic health record system. The data were entered into Microsoft Excel sheet, cleaned for errors, and statistically analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) version 26. The quantitative variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation while qualitative variables presented as frequencies. Results: In total, 132 nonduplicate E. faecalis and E. faecium were studied. E. faecalis (68.9%) was the predominantly isolated species followed by E. faecium (31.1%). The frequency of isolation was more among females (54.5%) and elderly (47.7%) aged more than 60 years. Majority of enterococci were isolated from urine (49.6%), followed by blood (29.1%) and pus/wound swab (11.8%). All isolates were susceptible to linezolid, while all isolates showed resistance to clindamycin. None of the E. faecalis isolates exhibited resistance to vancomycin, while 13.5% of E. faecium isolates were resistant to vancomycin. E. faecium showed higher resistance to beta lactams, ciprofloxacin, and nitrofurantoin (>80%), while E. faecalis demonstrated low resistance to beta-lactams and nitrofurantoin (<10%). Conclusions: Linezolid and vancomycin were effective against Enterococci causing nosocomial infection in our tertiary care hospital. However, continuous and frequent surveillance for resistance patterns is critical for judicious and evidence-based use of antibiotics.