阅读与英语学习者教学的科学:理解问题并倡导公平

IF 1.7 Q1 LINGUISTICS
Alba A. Ortiz, María E. Fránquiz, G. Lara
{"title":"阅读与英语学习者教学的科学:理解问题并倡导公平","authors":"Alba A. Ortiz, María E. Fránquiz, G. Lara","doi":"10.1080/15235882.2021.1976584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Schools in the U.S. have yet to achieve the goal that every student read at grade level or above by the end of grade 3, a goal first articulated twenty years ago in the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. In 2019, a third of fourth graders who took the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) scored below the basic proficiency level in reading; only 35% read at the proficient level (U.S. Department of Education, 2020). Of emergent bilinguals who took the 2017 NAEP assessment, 68% of both 4 and 8 graders scored below the basic reading proficiency level, compared to 29% of their 4 and 22% of their 8 grade native English speaking peers (U. S Department of Education, 2018). NAEP results are conducted in English, a language ELs have not yet mastered, so results are likely an underestimate of their actual reading abilities. Nonetheless, the data are concerning because they are essentially the same as the results reported for the 2007 NAEP assessment when 70% of emergent bilinguals performed at or below basic proficiency. Limited progress has been made in closing achievement gaps between ELs taught to read in English and their native English speaking peers. Every few years, concerns about the low reading performance of students in the U.S. give rise to what are popularly referred to as “reading wars.” A battle is currently underway in response to the growing number of states that have passed legislation requiring that teachers demonstrate proficiency in implementing the Science of Teaching Reading (SOTR). Most SOTR laws mandate teaching the “big five” elements of reading–phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. However, at the center of the debate is that policy and law emphasize phonics as the most important element of early reading instruction, raising concern that other essential elements of reading instruction will be minimized. State education agencies (SEAs) are developing compliance documents to guide implementation of SOTR principles as delineated in their respective legislation. Some guidance documents require that SOTR principles be used with all students, based on the assumption that the principles can be applied the same way whether students are native English speakers or emergent bilinguals who are learning to read in a language other than English or in English as a second language. Other documents focus on instruction for native English speakers, but “infuse” content related to emergent bilinguals. Few specifically address how to teach reading to emergent bilinguals in the native language, when and how to introduce English reading, or how to teach reading using English as a Second Language/ English Language Development (ESL/ ELD) approaches.","PeriodicalId":46530,"journal":{"name":"Bilingual Research Journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"153 - 157"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The science of teaching reading and English learners: Understanding the issues and advocating for equity\",\"authors\":\"Alba A. Ortiz, María E. Fránquiz, G. Lara\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15235882.2021.1976584\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Schools in the U.S. have yet to achieve the goal that every student read at grade level or above by the end of grade 3, a goal first articulated twenty years ago in the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. In 2019, a third of fourth graders who took the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) scored below the basic proficiency level in reading; only 35% read at the proficient level (U.S. Department of Education, 2020). Of emergent bilinguals who took the 2017 NAEP assessment, 68% of both 4 and 8 graders scored below the basic reading proficiency level, compared to 29% of their 4 and 22% of their 8 grade native English speaking peers (U. S Department of Education, 2018). NAEP results are conducted in English, a language ELs have not yet mastered, so results are likely an underestimate of their actual reading abilities. Nonetheless, the data are concerning because they are essentially the same as the results reported for the 2007 NAEP assessment when 70% of emergent bilinguals performed at or below basic proficiency. Limited progress has been made in closing achievement gaps between ELs taught to read in English and their native English speaking peers. Every few years, concerns about the low reading performance of students in the U.S. give rise to what are popularly referred to as “reading wars.” A battle is currently underway in response to the growing number of states that have passed legislation requiring that teachers demonstrate proficiency in implementing the Science of Teaching Reading (SOTR). Most SOTR laws mandate teaching the “big five” elements of reading–phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. However, at the center of the debate is that policy and law emphasize phonics as the most important element of early reading instruction, raising concern that other essential elements of reading instruction will be minimized. State education agencies (SEAs) are developing compliance documents to guide implementation of SOTR principles as delineated in their respective legislation. Some guidance documents require that SOTR principles be used with all students, based on the assumption that the principles can be applied the same way whether students are native English speakers or emergent bilinguals who are learning to read in a language other than English or in English as a second language. Other documents focus on instruction for native English speakers, but “infuse” content related to emergent bilinguals. Few specifically address how to teach reading to emergent bilinguals in the native language, when and how to introduce English reading, or how to teach reading using English as a Second Language/ English Language Development (ESL/ ELD) approaches.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46530,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bilingual Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"153 - 157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bilingual Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2021.1976584\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bilingual Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2021.1976584","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

美国的学校尚未实现让每个学生在三年级结束时都能达到年级或以上水平的目标,这一目标在20年前的2001年《不让一个孩子掉队法案》中首次提出。2019年,三分之一参加国家教育进步评估(NAEP)的四年级学生的阅读成绩低于基本水平;只有35%的人达到了熟练水平(美国教育部,2020年)。在参加2017年NAEP评估的初出茅庐的双语者中,68%的4年级和8年级学生的成绩低于基本阅读能力水平,而4年级学生的这一比例为29%,8年级母语为英语的同龄人的这一比率为22%(美国教育部,2018)。NAEP的结果是用英语进行的,这是一种ELs尚未掌握的语言,因此结果可能低估了他们的实际阅读能力。尽管如此,这些数据还是令人担忧,因为它们与2007年NAEP评估报告的结果基本相同,当时70%的紧急双语者的表现达到或低于基本水平。在缩小用英语阅读的ELs与以英语为母语的同龄人之间的成绩差距方面进展有限。每隔几年,人们对美国学生阅读成绩低下的担忧就会引发所谓的“阅读战争”。目前,越来越多的州通过了立法,要求教师熟练实施阅读教学科学(SOTR),这场战争正在进行中。大多数SOTR法律要求教授阅读的“五大”要素——音位意识、语音、流利性、词汇和理解。然而,争论的中心是,政策和法律强调语音是早期阅读教学的最重要元素,这引发了人们对阅读教学的其他基本元素将被最小化的担忧。国家教育机构(SEA)正在制定合规文件,以指导各自立法中规定的SOTR原则的实施。一些指导文件要求对所有学生使用SOTR原则,前提是无论学生是以英语为母语的人,还是正在学习用英语以外的语言阅读或将英语作为第二语言的新兴双语者,这些原则都可以以同样的方式应用。其他文件侧重于对以英语为母语的人的教学,但“注入”了与新兴双语者相关的内容。很少有人专门讨论如何用母语教授新兴双语者阅读,何时以及如何引入英语阅读,或者如何将英语作为第二语言/英语语言发展(ESL/ELD)方法教授阅读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The science of teaching reading and English learners: Understanding the issues and advocating for equity
Schools in the U.S. have yet to achieve the goal that every student read at grade level or above by the end of grade 3, a goal first articulated twenty years ago in the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. In 2019, a third of fourth graders who took the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) scored below the basic proficiency level in reading; only 35% read at the proficient level (U.S. Department of Education, 2020). Of emergent bilinguals who took the 2017 NAEP assessment, 68% of both 4 and 8 graders scored below the basic reading proficiency level, compared to 29% of their 4 and 22% of their 8 grade native English speaking peers (U. S Department of Education, 2018). NAEP results are conducted in English, a language ELs have not yet mastered, so results are likely an underestimate of their actual reading abilities. Nonetheless, the data are concerning because they are essentially the same as the results reported for the 2007 NAEP assessment when 70% of emergent bilinguals performed at or below basic proficiency. Limited progress has been made in closing achievement gaps between ELs taught to read in English and their native English speaking peers. Every few years, concerns about the low reading performance of students in the U.S. give rise to what are popularly referred to as “reading wars.” A battle is currently underway in response to the growing number of states that have passed legislation requiring that teachers demonstrate proficiency in implementing the Science of Teaching Reading (SOTR). Most SOTR laws mandate teaching the “big five” elements of reading–phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. However, at the center of the debate is that policy and law emphasize phonics as the most important element of early reading instruction, raising concern that other essential elements of reading instruction will be minimized. State education agencies (SEAs) are developing compliance documents to guide implementation of SOTR principles as delineated in their respective legislation. Some guidance documents require that SOTR principles be used with all students, based on the assumption that the principles can be applied the same way whether students are native English speakers or emergent bilinguals who are learning to read in a language other than English or in English as a second language. Other documents focus on instruction for native English speakers, but “infuse” content related to emergent bilinguals. Few specifically address how to teach reading to emergent bilinguals in the native language, when and how to introduce English reading, or how to teach reading using English as a Second Language/ English Language Development (ESL/ ELD) approaches.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Bilingual Research Journal is the National Association for Bilingual Education’s premier scholarly, peer-reviewed research publication. Bilingual Research Journal delivers in-depth coverage of education theory and practice, dealing with bilingual education, bilingualism, and language policies in education. Topics include: -Assessment- Biliteracy- Indigenous languages- Language planning- Language politics- Multilingualism- Pedagogical approaches- Policy analysis- Instructional research- Language planning- Second language acquisition. The journal has a strong interest in matters related to the education of language minority children and youth in the United States, grades PreK-12, but articles focusing on other countries are often included if they have implications for bilingual education in the U.S.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信