{"title":"打破校规:在不公正的教育体系中学生不遵守规定的可容许性","authors":"A. Nikolaidis, Winston C. Thompson","doi":"10.17763/1943-5045-91.2.204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rule violations are expected in schools, and assessments of the severity of those violations and the appropriate disciplinary responses are a significant aspect of educators’ responsibilities. While most educators and policy makers reject rule violation as a permissible behavior in schools, is such a categorical rejection always a suitable response, and are there circumstances that might merit an alternative response? In this article, A. C. Nikolaidis and Winston C. Thompson argue that under unjust circumstances, noncompliance with school rules may be permissible and even desirable. Building on a contractual framework placing systemic injustice at the center of inquiry, they show that under unjust conditions schools forfeit their ability to hold students accountable for role-dependent violations.","PeriodicalId":48207,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Educational Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Breaking School Rules: The Permissibility of Student Noncompliance in an Unjust Educational System\",\"authors\":\"A. Nikolaidis, Winston C. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.17763/1943-5045-91.2.204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rule violations are expected in schools, and assessments of the severity of those violations and the appropriate disciplinary responses are a significant aspect of educators’ responsibilities. While most educators and policy makers reject rule violation as a permissible behavior in schools, is such a categorical rejection always a suitable response, and are there circumstances that might merit an alternative response? In this article, A. C. Nikolaidis and Winston C. Thompson argue that under unjust circumstances, noncompliance with school rules may be permissible and even desirable. Building on a contractual framework placing systemic injustice at the center of inquiry, they show that under unjust conditions schools forfeit their ability to hold students accountable for role-dependent violations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Educational Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Educational Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-91.2.204\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Educational Review","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17763/1943-5045-91.2.204","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
学校违纪是预料之中的事,对违纪行为的严重程度进行评估和适当的纪律处分是教育工作者责任的一个重要方面。虽然大多数教育工作者和政策制定者拒绝将违反规则作为学校允许的行为,但这种断然拒绝总是合适的反应吗?是否存在值得采取替代反应的情况?在这篇文章中,A. C. Nikolaidis和Winston C. Thompson认为,在不公正的情况下,不遵守校规可能是允许的,甚至是可取的。在将系统性不公正置于调查中心的契约框架的基础上,他们表明,在不公正的条件下,学校丧失了让学生对角色依赖的违规行为负责的能力。
Breaking School Rules: The Permissibility of Student Noncompliance in an Unjust Educational System
Rule violations are expected in schools, and assessments of the severity of those violations and the appropriate disciplinary responses are a significant aspect of educators’ responsibilities. While most educators and policy makers reject rule violation as a permissible behavior in schools, is such a categorical rejection always a suitable response, and are there circumstances that might merit an alternative response? In this article, A. C. Nikolaidis and Winston C. Thompson argue that under unjust circumstances, noncompliance with school rules may be permissible and even desirable. Building on a contractual framework placing systemic injustice at the center of inquiry, they show that under unjust conditions schools forfeit their ability to hold students accountable for role-dependent violations.
期刊介绍:
The Harvard Educational Review (HER) accepts contributions from researchers, scholars, policy makers, practitioners, teachers, students, and informed observers in education and related fields. In addition to original reports of research and theory, HER welcomes articles that reflect on teaching and practice in educational settings in the United States and abroad.