幼儿在长度测量任务中的行为:策略和认知属性

IF 2 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
D. Clements, Holland W. Banse, J. Sarama, C. Tatsuoka, Candace Joswick, A. Hudyma, Douglas W. Van Dine, K. Tatsuoka
{"title":"幼儿在长度测量任务中的行为:策略和认知属性","authors":"D. Clements, Holland W. Banse, J. Sarama, C. Tatsuoka, Candace Joswick, A. Hudyma, Douglas W. Van Dine, K. Tatsuoka","doi":"10.1080/10986065.2020.1843231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Researchers often develop instruments using correctness scores (and a variety of theories and techniques, such as Item Response Theory) for validation and scoring. Less frequently, observations of children’s strategies are incorporated into the design, development, and application of assessments. We conducted individual interviews of 833 prekindergartens to Grade 3 children using 70 length measurement assessment items, recording both correctness and strategy use. We performed qualitative analyses of children’s strategies to validate or refine our hypotheses of how items align with strategies, and the concepts and procedures underlying them. We then used these analyses to refine: (a) our definitions of those strategies, concepts, and procedures; (b) the items in the assessment instrument; and (c) the alignment of both. The results will form the foundation of a Computer-Adaptive Test for length measurement, which we intend to validate in future research.","PeriodicalId":46800,"journal":{"name":"Mathematical Thinking and Learning","volume":"24 1","pages":"181 - 202"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10986065.2020.1843231","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Young children’s actions on length measurement tasks: strategies and cognitive attributes\",\"authors\":\"D. Clements, Holland W. Banse, J. Sarama, C. Tatsuoka, Candace Joswick, A. Hudyma, Douglas W. Van Dine, K. Tatsuoka\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10986065.2020.1843231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Researchers often develop instruments using correctness scores (and a variety of theories and techniques, such as Item Response Theory) for validation and scoring. Less frequently, observations of children’s strategies are incorporated into the design, development, and application of assessments. We conducted individual interviews of 833 prekindergartens to Grade 3 children using 70 length measurement assessment items, recording both correctness and strategy use. We performed qualitative analyses of children’s strategies to validate or refine our hypotheses of how items align with strategies, and the concepts and procedures underlying them. We then used these analyses to refine: (a) our definitions of those strategies, concepts, and procedures; (b) the items in the assessment instrument; and (c) the alignment of both. The results will form the foundation of a Computer-Adaptive Test for length measurement, which we intend to validate in future research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mathematical Thinking and Learning\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"181 - 202\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10986065.2020.1843231\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mathematical Thinking and Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1843231\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mathematical Thinking and Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2020.1843231","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要研究人员经常使用正确性评分(以及各种理论和技术,如项目反应理论)来开发工具进行验证和评分。较少将对儿童策略的观察纳入评估的设计、发展和应用中。我们对833名幼儿园前至三年级的儿童进行了个人访谈,使用了70个长度测量评估项目,记录了正确性和策略使用情况。我们对儿童的策略进行了定性分析,以验证或完善我们关于项目如何与策略相一致的假设,以及这些假设背后的概念和程序。然后,我们利用这些分析来完善:(a)我们对这些战略、概念和程序的定义;(b) 评估工具中的项目;以及(c)两者的对准。研究结果将为长度测量的计算机自适应测试奠定基础,我们打算在未来的研究中对其进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Young children’s actions on length measurement tasks: strategies and cognitive attributes
ABSTRACT Researchers often develop instruments using correctness scores (and a variety of theories and techniques, such as Item Response Theory) for validation and scoring. Less frequently, observations of children’s strategies are incorporated into the design, development, and application of assessments. We conducted individual interviews of 833 prekindergartens to Grade 3 children using 70 length measurement assessment items, recording both correctness and strategy use. We performed qualitative analyses of children’s strategies to validate or refine our hypotheses of how items align with strategies, and the concepts and procedures underlying them. We then used these analyses to refine: (a) our definitions of those strategies, concepts, and procedures; (b) the items in the assessment instrument; and (c) the alignment of both. The results will form the foundation of a Computer-Adaptive Test for length measurement, which we intend to validate in future research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mathematical Thinking and Learning
Mathematical Thinking and Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信