从仇恨言论中挣扎和治愈:有色人种学生事务专业人员为社区大学分享疫情后的想象

IF 1.3 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Michiko Kealoha
{"title":"从仇恨言论中挣扎和治愈:有色人种学生事务专业人员为社区大学分享疫情后的想象","authors":"Michiko Kealoha","doi":"10.1080/00131946.2023.2169691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Throughout history, people have united to demand change and accountability in the face of injustice. Although freedom of speech and assembly rights have been essential in uplifting and empowering marginalized communities throughout history, it is important to name the existence of speech that seeks to expand rights and speech which aims to restrict rights. Hate speech occurrences have increased dramatically since 2016 and many scholars cite college campuses as a specialized place for hate and social movements. Despite this increase in incidents and scholarly attention focused on on-campus hate speech, there is a gap in knowledge regarding those staff members who oversee hate speech incidents as people of color, especially those who work in community colleges. Utilizing a Critical Race Study lens, this study explored how student affairs professionals of color in California community college settings experience and navigate hate speech and White supremacy. Through eight collective counter-narratives, educators provided insight into White supremacy incidents on campus and the biased federal policy that affects their day-to-day work with students. Their collective stories re-imagine the post-pandemic community college what it means to be safe in community colleges through the twin pandemics and how the community college campus as a whole can come together to challenge White supremacy and support highly vulnerable and marginalized community college students. Their exploration of experiences also paints a picture of coalitions that must be built and sustained within the community. And finally, this study provides insight into the navigation and radical re-imagining of hate speech education and healing together as community colleges reopen during the COVID-19 pandemic and escalation of racial injustice.","PeriodicalId":46285,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies-AESA","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reeling and Healing from Hate Speech: Student Affairs Professionals of Color Share Post-pandemic Imaginations for Community Colleges\",\"authors\":\"Michiko Kealoha\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00131946.2023.2169691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Throughout history, people have united to demand change and accountability in the face of injustice. Although freedom of speech and assembly rights have been essential in uplifting and empowering marginalized communities throughout history, it is important to name the existence of speech that seeks to expand rights and speech which aims to restrict rights. Hate speech occurrences have increased dramatically since 2016 and many scholars cite college campuses as a specialized place for hate and social movements. Despite this increase in incidents and scholarly attention focused on on-campus hate speech, there is a gap in knowledge regarding those staff members who oversee hate speech incidents as people of color, especially those who work in community colleges. Utilizing a Critical Race Study lens, this study explored how student affairs professionals of color in California community college settings experience and navigate hate speech and White supremacy. Through eight collective counter-narratives, educators provided insight into White supremacy incidents on campus and the biased federal policy that affects their day-to-day work with students. Their collective stories re-imagine the post-pandemic community college what it means to be safe in community colleges through the twin pandemics and how the community college campus as a whole can come together to challenge White supremacy and support highly vulnerable and marginalized community college students. Their exploration of experiences also paints a picture of coalitions that must be built and sustained within the community. And finally, this study provides insight into the navigation and radical re-imagining of hate speech education and healing together as community colleges reopen during the COVID-19 pandemic and escalation of racial injustice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Studies-AESA\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Studies-AESA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2023.2169691\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Studies-AESA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2023.2169691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

纵观历史,面对不公,人们团结起来要求变革和问责。虽然在历史上,言论自由和集会权对边缘化群体的提升和赋权至关重要,但重要的是要指出寻求扩大权利的言论和旨在限制权利的言论的存在。自2016年以来,仇恨言论急剧增加,许多学者认为大学校园是仇恨和社会运动的专门场所。尽管校园仇恨言论事件有所增加,学术界的注意力也集中在校园仇恨言论上,但对于那些负责监督仇恨言论事件的有色人种工作人员,尤其是那些在社区大学工作的工作人员,人们的认识还存在差距。利用批判性种族研究的视角,本研究探讨了加州社区大学环境中的有色人种学生事务专业人员如何经历和应对仇恨言论和白人至上主义。通过八种集体反叙事,教育工作者提供了对校园白人至上事件的见解,以及影响他们与学生日常工作的有偏见的联邦政策。他们的集体故事重新想象了大流行后的社区大学,在两次大流行中,社区大学的安全意味着什么,以及整个社区大学校园如何团结起来挑战白人至上主义,支持高度脆弱和边缘化的社区大学生。他们对经验的探索也描绘了一幅必须在社区内建立和维持联盟的图景。最后,随着社区大学在2019冠状病毒病大流行和种族不公正升级期间重新开放,本研究提供了对仇恨言论教育和共同治愈的导航和彻底重新构想的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reeling and Healing from Hate Speech: Student Affairs Professionals of Color Share Post-pandemic Imaginations for Community Colleges
Abstract Throughout history, people have united to demand change and accountability in the face of injustice. Although freedom of speech and assembly rights have been essential in uplifting and empowering marginalized communities throughout history, it is important to name the existence of speech that seeks to expand rights and speech which aims to restrict rights. Hate speech occurrences have increased dramatically since 2016 and many scholars cite college campuses as a specialized place for hate and social movements. Despite this increase in incidents and scholarly attention focused on on-campus hate speech, there is a gap in knowledge regarding those staff members who oversee hate speech incidents as people of color, especially those who work in community colleges. Utilizing a Critical Race Study lens, this study explored how student affairs professionals of color in California community college settings experience and navigate hate speech and White supremacy. Through eight collective counter-narratives, educators provided insight into White supremacy incidents on campus and the biased federal policy that affects their day-to-day work with students. Their collective stories re-imagine the post-pandemic community college what it means to be safe in community colleges through the twin pandemics and how the community college campus as a whole can come together to challenge White supremacy and support highly vulnerable and marginalized community college students. Their exploration of experiences also paints a picture of coalitions that must be built and sustained within the community. And finally, this study provides insight into the navigation and radical re-imagining of hate speech education and healing together as community colleges reopen during the COVID-19 pandemic and escalation of racial injustice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Studies-AESA
Educational Studies-AESA EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信