音乐文案与音乐教育问题:解禁与音乐教学

IF 1.8 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Fangna Peng
{"title":"音乐文案与音乐教育问题:解禁与音乐教学","authors":"Fangna Peng","doi":"10.1080/14613808.2022.2128319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study aims to discuss the fundamentals of music copywriting in music education and identify pathways for integrating musical compositions into the learning process without infringing copyright and prohibiting the use of specific music pieces. To achieve this goal, the authors used methods of analysis to identify the available resources in the field of music copywriting and education. The study reports that 35% of students give their preference to classical music, 32% want to use traditional Chinese music, and only 22% consider it possible to play modern melodies. To avoid copyright infringement in the presentation of theory that is available on the Internet, authors should document their original approach to learning and publish the data in books and monographs. The authors found that the use of classical music in the classroom was not an infringement of copyright because the statute of limitations had expired. The findings suggested that the students whose similarity scores ranged from 0 to 24% in the music compositions got better knowledge, with the coefficient of effectiveness of 2.5.","PeriodicalId":46798,"journal":{"name":"Music Education Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"1 - 12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Music copywriting and the problems of music education: overcoming prohibitions and the use of music in teaching\",\"authors\":\"Fangna Peng\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14613808.2022.2128319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study aims to discuss the fundamentals of music copywriting in music education and identify pathways for integrating musical compositions into the learning process without infringing copyright and prohibiting the use of specific music pieces. To achieve this goal, the authors used methods of analysis to identify the available resources in the field of music copywriting and education. The study reports that 35% of students give their preference to classical music, 32% want to use traditional Chinese music, and only 22% consider it possible to play modern melodies. To avoid copyright infringement in the presentation of theory that is available on the Internet, authors should document their original approach to learning and publish the data in books and monographs. The authors found that the use of classical music in the classroom was not an infringement of copyright because the statute of limitations had expired. The findings suggested that the students whose similarity scores ranged from 0 to 24% in the music compositions got better knowledge, with the coefficient of effectiveness of 2.5.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Music Education Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 12\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Music Education Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2022.2128319\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Music Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14613808.2022.2128319","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究旨在探讨音乐教育中音乐文案的基本原理,并确定在不侵犯版权和禁止使用特定音乐作品的情况下将音乐作品融入学习过程的途径。为了实现这一目标,作者使用分析方法来确定音乐文案和教育领域的可用资源。研究报告显示,35%的学生更喜欢古典音乐,32%的学生希望使用中国传统音乐,只有22%的学生认为可以演奏现代旋律。为了避免在互联网上展示理论时侵犯版权,作者应该记录他们的原始学习方法,并将数据发表在书籍和专著中。提交人发现,在课堂上使用古典音乐并不侵犯版权,因为诉讼时效已经到期。研究结果表明,音乐作品中相似性得分在0至24%之间的学生知识掌握得更好,有效性系数为2.5。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Music copywriting and the problems of music education: overcoming prohibitions and the use of music in teaching
ABSTRACT This study aims to discuss the fundamentals of music copywriting in music education and identify pathways for integrating musical compositions into the learning process without infringing copyright and prohibiting the use of specific music pieces. To achieve this goal, the authors used methods of analysis to identify the available resources in the field of music copywriting and education. The study reports that 35% of students give their preference to classical music, 32% want to use traditional Chinese music, and only 22% consider it possible to play modern melodies. To avoid copyright infringement in the presentation of theory that is available on the Internet, authors should document their original approach to learning and publish the data in books and monographs. The authors found that the use of classical music in the classroom was not an infringement of copyright because the statute of limitations had expired. The findings suggested that the students whose similarity scores ranged from 0 to 24% in the music compositions got better knowledge, with the coefficient of effectiveness of 2.5.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
50
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信