主观职业成功量表的心理测量特性、测量不变性和结构有效性

IF 3.6 4区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Chantal Olckers, E. Koekemoer
{"title":"主观职业成功量表的心理测量特性、测量不变性和结构有效性","authors":"Chantal Olckers, E. Koekemoer","doi":"10.1080/00049530.2022.2121177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT With the increased scholarly interest in career success measurements, this study investigated the construct validity and measurement invariance of the Subjective Career Success Inventory. A sample of 736 South African employees participated in the study. Latent variable modelling was performed to estimate and sequentially compare several independent cluster models of confirmatory factor analysis (ICM-CFA) (i.e., unidimensional, first-factor, second-factor, and bifactor models). The results supported the construct validity for an eight-dimensional construct with acceptable convergent and discriminant validity. We found measurement invariance across gender. Task performance was related to the eight subjective career success dimensions, providing evidence of nomological validity. Key points What is already known about this topic: (1) The Subjective Career Success Inventory (SCSI) is increasingly being used to measure subjective career success, but studies reporting comprehensive psychometric properties for the SCSI are scarce. (2) Literature indicates various factorial permutations for the instrument, and limited validation studies have been conducted on the SCSI. (3) Although scholars have argued gender gaps in the experiences of career success, a thorough investigation of the SCSI has not been done to corroborate such differences. What this topic adds: (1) The eight-factor structure of the SCSI was confirmed within the South African context. (2) The SCSI demonstrated invariance between males and females. (3) Task performance was related to the eight SCSI dimensions, providing evidence of nomological validity.","PeriodicalId":8871,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychometric properties, measurement invariance, and construct validity of the subjective career success inventory\",\"authors\":\"Chantal Olckers, E. Koekemoer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00049530.2022.2121177\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT With the increased scholarly interest in career success measurements, this study investigated the construct validity and measurement invariance of the Subjective Career Success Inventory. A sample of 736 South African employees participated in the study. Latent variable modelling was performed to estimate and sequentially compare several independent cluster models of confirmatory factor analysis (ICM-CFA) (i.e., unidimensional, first-factor, second-factor, and bifactor models). The results supported the construct validity for an eight-dimensional construct with acceptable convergent and discriminant validity. We found measurement invariance across gender. Task performance was related to the eight subjective career success dimensions, providing evidence of nomological validity. Key points What is already known about this topic: (1) The Subjective Career Success Inventory (SCSI) is increasingly being used to measure subjective career success, but studies reporting comprehensive psychometric properties for the SCSI are scarce. (2) Literature indicates various factorial permutations for the instrument, and limited validation studies have been conducted on the SCSI. (3) Although scholars have argued gender gaps in the experiences of career success, a thorough investigation of the SCSI has not been done to corroborate such differences. What this topic adds: (1) The eight-factor structure of the SCSI was confirmed within the South African context. (2) The SCSI demonstrated invariance between males and females. (3) Task performance was related to the eight SCSI dimensions, providing evidence of nomological validity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2022.2121177\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2022.2121177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要随着学术界对职业成功测量兴趣的增加,本研究考察了主观职业成功量表的结构有效性和测量不变性。736名南非员工参与了这项研究。进行潜在变量建模,以估计和顺序比较验证性因素分析(ICM-CFA)的几个独立聚类模型(即一维、第一因素、第二因素和双因素模型)。结果支持了具有可接受的收敛和判别有效性的八维结构的结构有效性。我们发现了跨性别的测量不变性。任务表现与八个主观职业成功维度相关,提供了法理有效性的证据。关键点关于这个主题已经知道的内容:(1)主观职业成功量表(SCSI)越来越多地被用来衡量主观职业成功,但报告SCSI综合心理测量特性的研究很少。(2) 文献指出了仪器的各种因子排列,并且对SCSI进行了有限的验证研究。(3) 尽管学者们认为职业成功经历中存在性别差异,但尚未对SCSI进行彻底调查来证实这种差异。本主题补充:(1)SCSI的八因素结构在南非背景下得到了证实。(2) SCSI显示了男性和女性之间的不变性。(3) 任务性能与八个SCSI维度有关,提供了法理有效性的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Psychometric properties, measurement invariance, and construct validity of the subjective career success inventory
ABSTRACT With the increased scholarly interest in career success measurements, this study investigated the construct validity and measurement invariance of the Subjective Career Success Inventory. A sample of 736 South African employees participated in the study. Latent variable modelling was performed to estimate and sequentially compare several independent cluster models of confirmatory factor analysis (ICM-CFA) (i.e., unidimensional, first-factor, second-factor, and bifactor models). The results supported the construct validity for an eight-dimensional construct with acceptable convergent and discriminant validity. We found measurement invariance across gender. Task performance was related to the eight subjective career success dimensions, providing evidence of nomological validity. Key points What is already known about this topic: (1) The Subjective Career Success Inventory (SCSI) is increasingly being used to measure subjective career success, but studies reporting comprehensive psychometric properties for the SCSI are scarce. (2) Literature indicates various factorial permutations for the instrument, and limited validation studies have been conducted on the SCSI. (3) Although scholars have argued gender gaps in the experiences of career success, a thorough investigation of the SCSI has not been done to corroborate such differences. What this topic adds: (1) The eight-factor structure of the SCSI was confirmed within the South African context. (2) The SCSI demonstrated invariance between males and females. (3) Task performance was related to the eight SCSI dimensions, providing evidence of nomological validity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Psychology
Australian Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Australian Journal of Psychology is the premier scientific journal of the Australian Psychological Society. It covers the entire spectrum of psychological research and receives articles on all topics within the broad scope of the discipline. The journal publishes high quality peer-reviewed articles with reviewers and associate editors providing detailed assistance to authors to reach publication. The journal publishes reports of experimental and survey studies, including reports of qualitative investigations, on pure and applied topics in the field of psychology. Articles on clinical psychology or on the professional concerns of applied psychology should be submitted to our sister journals, Australian Psychologist or Clinical Psychologist. The journal publishes occasional reviews of specific topics, theoretical pieces and commentaries on methodological issues. There are also solicited book reviews and comments Annual special issues devoted to a single topic, and guest edited by a specialist editor, are published. The journal regards itself as international in vision and will accept submissions from psychologists in all countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信