机构代理人与学生活动家的关系

Q2 Social Sciences
Alex C. Lange, S. Quaye, Chris Linder, Meg E. Evans
{"title":"机构代理人与学生活动家的关系","authors":"Alex C. Lange, S. Quaye, Chris Linder, Meg E. Evans","doi":"10.1080/0161956X.2022.2125761","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Researchers studying college student activism have learned much about those students’ motivations, tactics, and educational outcomes. Less is known about the relationships between activists and key institutional agents. For student activists with minoritized identities, institutional agents sometimes establish and maintain barriers between their institutions’ espoused and enacted values of equity and justice. In this article, we used data from a national narrative inquiry study of minoritized student activists to understand how activists and agents worked in supportive and adversarial relationships with each other. Specifically, we focus on participants’ perspectives to name the ways institutional agents created barriers against and provided support for students’ activism. We share implications for practice for those seeking to forge stronger relationships with student activists grounded in support and a commitment to equity. This article offers researchers who seek to understand the more significant institutional dynamics of student activism a window into some of the critical interpersonal relationships that drive and foreclose change on college campuses.","PeriodicalId":39777,"journal":{"name":"Peabody Journal of Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationships Between Institutional Agents and Student Activists\",\"authors\":\"Alex C. Lange, S. Quaye, Chris Linder, Meg E. Evans\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0161956X.2022.2125761\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Researchers studying college student activism have learned much about those students’ motivations, tactics, and educational outcomes. Less is known about the relationships between activists and key institutional agents. For student activists with minoritized identities, institutional agents sometimes establish and maintain barriers between their institutions’ espoused and enacted values of equity and justice. In this article, we used data from a national narrative inquiry study of minoritized student activists to understand how activists and agents worked in supportive and adversarial relationships with each other. Specifically, we focus on participants’ perspectives to name the ways institutional agents created barriers against and provided support for students’ activism. We share implications for practice for those seeking to forge stronger relationships with student activists grounded in support and a commitment to equity. This article offers researchers who seek to understand the more significant institutional dynamics of student activism a window into some of the critical interpersonal relationships that drive and foreclose change on college campuses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Peabody Journal of Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Peabody Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2022.2125761\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Peabody Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0161956X.2022.2125761","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要研究大学生激进主义的研究人员已经对这些学生的动机、策略和教育成果有了很多了解。关于活动家和主要机构代理人之间的关系,人们知之甚少。对于具有少数族裔身份的学生活动家来说,机构代理人有时会在其机构所支持和实施的公平正义价值观之间建立和维护障碍。在这篇文章中,我们使用了一项针对少数族裔学生活动家的全国性叙事调查研究的数据,来了解活动家和代理人是如何在相互支持和对抗的关系中工作的。具体而言,我们关注参与者的观点,以命名机构代理人如何为学生的行动主义制造障碍并提供支持。我们分享了对那些寻求与以支持和公平承诺为基础的学生活动家建立更牢固关系的人的实践启示。这篇文章为那些试图了解学生激进主义更重要的制度动态的研究人员提供了一扇窗户,让他们了解一些推动和阻止大学校园变革的关键人际关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationships Between Institutional Agents and Student Activists
ABSTRACT Researchers studying college student activism have learned much about those students’ motivations, tactics, and educational outcomes. Less is known about the relationships between activists and key institutional agents. For student activists with minoritized identities, institutional agents sometimes establish and maintain barriers between their institutions’ espoused and enacted values of equity and justice. In this article, we used data from a national narrative inquiry study of minoritized student activists to understand how activists and agents worked in supportive and adversarial relationships with each other. Specifically, we focus on participants’ perspectives to name the ways institutional agents created barriers against and provided support for students’ activism. We share implications for practice for those seeking to forge stronger relationships with student activists grounded in support and a commitment to equity. This article offers researchers who seek to understand the more significant institutional dynamics of student activism a window into some of the critical interpersonal relationships that drive and foreclose change on college campuses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Peabody Journal of Education
Peabody Journal of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Peabody Journal of Education (PJE) publishes quarterly symposia in the broad area of education, including but not limited to topics related to formal institutions serving students in early childhood, pre-school, primary, elementary, intermediate, secondary, post-secondary, and tertiary education. The scope of the journal includes special kinds of educational institutions, such as those providing vocational training or the schooling for students with disabilities. PJE also welcomes manuscript submissions that concentrate on informal education dynamics, those outside the immediate framework of institutions, and education matters that are important to nations outside the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信