加纳公共服务中组织绩效问题的持续存在:社会文化视角

IF 2 Q3 MANAGEMENT
E. Amoako-Asiedu, F. Ohemeng, T. Obuobisa-Darko, Kenneth E. Parku
{"title":"加纳公共服务中组织绩效问题的持续存在:社会文化视角","authors":"E. Amoako-Asiedu, F. Ohemeng, T. Obuobisa-Darko, Kenneth E. Parku","doi":"10.1177/14705958231190825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Performance management (PM) has been one of the most profound initiatives of public services reforms in both developed and developing countries in the last three decades. Despite its acceptance as a tool to enhance efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability, many continue to question its efficacy to enhance organizational performance in public services. This is because organizational performance problems continue to persist in the sector. How then can this persistence of organizational performance problems be explained? For some scholars, the answer lies in examining the behaviour of employees and thus moving away from the instrumentality of PM. While this is laudable, what influences employees’ behaviours for them to engage in activities that make nonsense of the existence of PM has not been greatly articulated. In this paper, we attempt to contribute to this discussion by focusing on how societal culture influences behaviour, which in turn affects management of performance both internationaly and across cultures. We, therefore, argue that the inability of PM to effectively achieve its objectives is due to the high prevalence of informal societal culture that influences behaviours detrimental to rational performance PM in the public sector. We examine these behaviours from Hofstede’s four cultural dimensions with a focus on Ghana.","PeriodicalId":46626,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cross Cultural Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The persistence of organizational performance problems the public services in Ghana: The perspective of societal culture\",\"authors\":\"E. Amoako-Asiedu, F. Ohemeng, T. Obuobisa-Darko, Kenneth E. Parku\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14705958231190825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Performance management (PM) has been one of the most profound initiatives of public services reforms in both developed and developing countries in the last three decades. Despite its acceptance as a tool to enhance efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability, many continue to question its efficacy to enhance organizational performance in public services. This is because organizational performance problems continue to persist in the sector. How then can this persistence of organizational performance problems be explained? For some scholars, the answer lies in examining the behaviour of employees and thus moving away from the instrumentality of PM. While this is laudable, what influences employees’ behaviours for them to engage in activities that make nonsense of the existence of PM has not been greatly articulated. In this paper, we attempt to contribute to this discussion by focusing on how societal culture influences behaviour, which in turn affects management of performance both internationaly and across cultures. We, therefore, argue that the inability of PM to effectively achieve its objectives is due to the high prevalence of informal societal culture that influences behaviours detrimental to rational performance PM in the public sector. We examine these behaviours from Hofstede’s four cultural dimensions with a focus on Ghana.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cross Cultural Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cross Cultural Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14705958231190825\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cross Cultural Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14705958231190825","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

绩效管理(PM)是过去三十年来发达国家和发展中国家公共服务改革中最深刻的举措之一。尽管它被接受为提高效率、有效性和问责制的工具,但许多人继续质疑它在提高公共服务组织绩效方面的功效。这是因为该部门的组织绩效问题继续存在。那么,如何解释组织绩效问题的持续存在呢?对于一些学者来说,答案在于检查员工的行为,从而远离项目管理的工具作用。虽然这是值得称赞的,但是什么影响了员工的行为,使他们参与到使项目管理的存在变得毫无意义的活动中,这一点还没有得到很好的阐述。在本文中,我们试图通过关注社会文化如何影响行为来促进这一讨论,这反过来又影响了国际和跨文化的绩效管理。因此,我们认为项目管理无法有效实现其目标是由于公共部门非正式社会文化的高度流行,这些文化影响了不利于合理绩效项目管理的行为。我们从霍夫斯泰德的四个文化维度来研究这些行为,并以加纳为重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The persistence of organizational performance problems the public services in Ghana: The perspective of societal culture
Performance management (PM) has been one of the most profound initiatives of public services reforms in both developed and developing countries in the last three decades. Despite its acceptance as a tool to enhance efficiency, effectiveness, and accountability, many continue to question its efficacy to enhance organizational performance in public services. This is because organizational performance problems continue to persist in the sector. How then can this persistence of organizational performance problems be explained? For some scholars, the answer lies in examining the behaviour of employees and thus moving away from the instrumentality of PM. While this is laudable, what influences employees’ behaviours for them to engage in activities that make nonsense of the existence of PM has not been greatly articulated. In this paper, we attempt to contribute to this discussion by focusing on how societal culture influences behaviour, which in turn affects management of performance both internationaly and across cultures. We, therefore, argue that the inability of PM to effectively achieve its objectives is due to the high prevalence of informal societal culture that influences behaviours detrimental to rational performance PM in the public sector. We examine these behaviours from Hofstede’s four cultural dimensions with a focus on Ghana.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cross Cultural Management is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research in cross cultural aspects of management, work and organization. The International Journal of Cross Cultural Management (IJCCM) aims to provide a specialized academic medium and main reference for the encouragement and dissemination of research on cross cultural aspects of management, work and organization. This includes both original qualitative and quantitative empirical work as well as theoretical and conceptual work which adds to the understanding of management across cultures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信