前言

IF 1.6 3区教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Curriculum Inquiry Pub Date : 2020-11-18 DOI:10.1080/03626784.2021.1847533

G. Dei

{"title":"前言","authors":"G. Dei","doi":"10.1080/03626784.2021.1847533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This is a very exciting special issue of Curriculum Inquiry and I am honoured to write this foreword. The theme “Anti-Blackness in Curriculum Studies” is one I approach with both urgency and pause. I, the coeditors, the contributors, and many readers have very intimate and scholarly relationships to anti-Blackness and more specifically to anti-Blackness in Curriculum Studies. Many people, however, do not. School leaders and their curriculum developers, policy designers, evaluation and implementation experts, knowledge translators, health and resource specialists, and frontline school professionals are among the many who are often – purposefully or not – removed from anti-Blackness. Hence the coeditors’ resounding call for papers “to give readers and curriculum workers entry points into an expansive, interdisciplinary dialogue on anti-Blackness in curriculum studies” (Ohito et al., n.d., para. 1). They extend and deepen this call by inviting the contributors to theorize","PeriodicalId":47299,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Inquiry","volume":"51 1","pages":"1 - 14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03626784.2021.1847533","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Foreword\",\"authors\":\"G. Dei\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03626784.2021.1847533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This is a very exciting special issue of Curriculum Inquiry and I am honoured to write this foreword. The theme “Anti-Blackness in Curriculum Studies” is one I approach with both urgency and pause. I, the coeditors, the contributors, and many readers have very intimate and scholarly relationships to anti-Blackness and more specifically to anti-Blackness in Curriculum Studies. Many people, however, do not. School leaders and their curriculum developers, policy designers, evaluation and implementation experts, knowledge translators, health and resource specialists, and frontline school professionals are among the many who are often – purposefully or not – removed from anti-Blackness. Hence the coeditors’ resounding call for papers “to give readers and curriculum workers entry points into an expansive, interdisciplinary dialogue on anti-Blackness in curriculum studies” (Ohito et al., n.d., para. 1). They extend and deepen this call by inviting the contributors to theorize\",\"PeriodicalId\":47299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curriculum Inquiry\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03626784.2021.1847533\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curriculum Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2021.1847533\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2021.1847533","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

这是《课程探究》的一期非常激动人心的特刊，我很荣幸为它写前言。“课程研究中的反黑人”这一主题是我既紧迫又踌躇的话题。我，合著者，贡献者，以及许多读者都与反黑人有着非常密切的学术关系，更具体地说，与课程研究中的反黑人有着密切的学术关系。然而，许多人却没有。学校领导及其课程开发人员、政策设计者、评估和实施专家、知识翻译人员、健康和资源专家以及一线学校专业人员都是经常(有意或无意地)从反黑人中移除的人。因此，共同编辑强烈呼吁论文“为读者和课程工作者提供进入课程研究中反黑人的广泛跨学科对话的切入点”(Ohito et al.， n.d，第6段)。他们通过邀请贡献者理论化来扩展和深化这一呼吁

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Foreword

This is a very exciting special issue of Curriculum Inquiry and I am honoured to write this foreword. The theme “Anti-Blackness in Curriculum Studies” is one I approach with both urgency and pause. I, the coeditors, the contributors, and many readers have very intimate and scholarly relationships to anti-Blackness and more specifically to anti-Blackness in Curriculum Studies. Many people, however, do not. School leaders and their curriculum developers, policy designers, evaluation and implementation experts, knowledge translators, health and resource specialists, and frontline school professionals are among the many who are often – purposefully or not – removed from anti-Blackness. Hence the coeditors’ resounding call for papers “to give readers and curriculum workers entry points into an expansive, interdisciplinary dialogue on anti-Blackness in curriculum studies” (Ohito et al., n.d., para. 1). They extend and deepen this call by inviting the contributors to theorize

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Curriculum Inquiry EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

3.10

自引率

17.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Curriculum Inquiry is dedicated to the study of educational research, development, evaluation, and theory. This leading international journal brings together influential academics and researchers from a variety of disciplines around the world to provide expert commentary and lively debate. Articles explore important ideas, issues, trends, and problems in education, and each issue also includes provocative and critically analytical editorials covering topics such as curriculum development, educational policy, and teacher education.