医院供应链中的替代信息处理机制:对成本、质量和患者满意度的影响

IF 2.8 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Xiaosong (David) Peng, Barbara Flynn, Arunachalam Narayanan, Raymond Fan
{"title":"医院供应链中的替代信息处理机制:对成本、质量和患者满意度的影响","authors":"Xiaosong (David) Peng,&nbsp;Barbara Flynn,&nbsp;Arunachalam Narayanan,&nbsp;Raymond Fan","doi":"10.1111/deci.12556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Hospitals are under tremendous pressure to improve multiple performance dimensions that may be at odds, including cost containment, clinical quality, and patient satisfaction. The need to improve performance on multiple fronts is compounded by sources of uncertainty that include upstream diversity of supply chain (SC) partners, internal diversity of clinical specialties provided, and downstream diversity of patient conditions. Information processing theory (IPT) suggests two strategies for dealing with uncertainty: reduce the amount of information elevated to higher levels for processing and accommodate the amount of information by increasing information processing at other levels. We apply IPT to investigate (i) the relationship between the two information processing strategies in a hospital's SC and its cost containment, clinical quality, and patient satisfaction performance, and (ii) how these relationships may be moderated by diversity in the hospital's SC partners, clinical specialties, and patients, the common sources of uncertainty in hospital SCs. These questions were examined using regression analysis of primary data from acute care hospitals matched with secondary data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, American Hospital Association and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality measuring hospital operating characteristics and performance. The analysis yielded several important findings: (i) while a slack resources strategy (uncertainty reduction) is effective for improving patient satisfaction performance, it is ineffective for reducing cost, (ii) a lateral relations strategy (uncertainty accommodation) is effective in improving all three performance dimensions, and (iii) these relationships are moderated differentially by the three diversity dimensions only for lateral relations. These findings offer important managerial insights about hospitals’ efforts to improve potentially conflicting performance outcomes and suggest interesting opportunities for future research applying IPT to this important topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":48256,"journal":{"name":"DECISION SCIENCES","volume":"54 5","pages":"494-513"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative information processing mechanisms in hospital supply chains: Impact on cost, quality, and patient satisfaction\",\"authors\":\"Xiaosong (David) Peng,&nbsp;Barbara Flynn,&nbsp;Arunachalam Narayanan,&nbsp;Raymond Fan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/deci.12556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Hospitals are under tremendous pressure to improve multiple performance dimensions that may be at odds, including cost containment, clinical quality, and patient satisfaction. The need to improve performance on multiple fronts is compounded by sources of uncertainty that include upstream diversity of supply chain (SC) partners, internal diversity of clinical specialties provided, and downstream diversity of patient conditions. Information processing theory (IPT) suggests two strategies for dealing with uncertainty: reduce the amount of information elevated to higher levels for processing and accommodate the amount of information by increasing information processing at other levels. We apply IPT to investigate (i) the relationship between the two information processing strategies in a hospital's SC and its cost containment, clinical quality, and patient satisfaction performance, and (ii) how these relationships may be moderated by diversity in the hospital's SC partners, clinical specialties, and patients, the common sources of uncertainty in hospital SCs. These questions were examined using regression analysis of primary data from acute care hospitals matched with secondary data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, American Hospital Association and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality measuring hospital operating characteristics and performance. The analysis yielded several important findings: (i) while a slack resources strategy (uncertainty reduction) is effective for improving patient satisfaction performance, it is ineffective for reducing cost, (ii) a lateral relations strategy (uncertainty accommodation) is effective in improving all three performance dimensions, and (iii) these relationships are moderated differentially by the three diversity dimensions only for lateral relations. These findings offer important managerial insights about hospitals’ efforts to improve potentially conflicting performance outcomes and suggest interesting opportunities for future research applying IPT to this important topic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DECISION SCIENCES\",\"volume\":\"54 5\",\"pages\":\"494-513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DECISION SCIENCES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12556\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DECISION SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/deci.12556","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

医院面临着巨大的压力,需要改善多个可能不一致的性能维度,包括成本控制、临床质量和患者满意度。由于供应链上游合作伙伴的多样性、所提供临床专科的内部多样性以及下游患者状况的多样性等不确定性来源,提高多个方面绩效的需求变得更加复杂。信息处理理论(Information processing theory, IPT)提出了两种处理不确定性的策略:减少被提升到更高层次进行处理的信息量,以及通过增加其他层次的信息处理来适应信息量。我们应用IPT来研究(i)医院SC的两种信息处理策略与成本控制、临床质量和患者满意度绩效之间的关系,以及(ii)医院SC合作伙伴、临床专业和患者的多样性如何调节这些关系,医院SC中常见的不确定性来源。这些问题是通过回归分析急症护理医院的主要数据与医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心、美国医院协会和医疗保健研究与质量机构测量医院运营特征和绩效的次要数据相匹配来检验的。分析得出了几个重要的发现:(i)虽然松弛资源策略(减少不确定性)对提高患者满意度绩效有效,但对降低成本无效,(ii)横向关系策略(不确定性调节)对改善所有三个绩效维度都有效,以及(iii)这些关系仅在横向关系中受到三个多样性维度的差异调节。这些发现为医院努力改善潜在冲突的绩效结果提供了重要的管理见解,并为将IPT应用于这一重要主题的未来研究提供了有趣的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alternative information processing mechanisms in hospital supply chains: Impact on cost, quality, and patient satisfaction

Hospitals are under tremendous pressure to improve multiple performance dimensions that may be at odds, including cost containment, clinical quality, and patient satisfaction. The need to improve performance on multiple fronts is compounded by sources of uncertainty that include upstream diversity of supply chain (SC) partners, internal diversity of clinical specialties provided, and downstream diversity of patient conditions. Information processing theory (IPT) suggests two strategies for dealing with uncertainty: reduce the amount of information elevated to higher levels for processing and accommodate the amount of information by increasing information processing at other levels. We apply IPT to investigate (i) the relationship between the two information processing strategies in a hospital's SC and its cost containment, clinical quality, and patient satisfaction performance, and (ii) how these relationships may be moderated by diversity in the hospital's SC partners, clinical specialties, and patients, the common sources of uncertainty in hospital SCs. These questions were examined using regression analysis of primary data from acute care hospitals matched with secondary data from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, American Hospital Association and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality measuring hospital operating characteristics and performance. The analysis yielded several important findings: (i) while a slack resources strategy (uncertainty reduction) is effective for improving patient satisfaction performance, it is ineffective for reducing cost, (ii) a lateral relations strategy (uncertainty accommodation) is effective in improving all three performance dimensions, and (iii) these relationships are moderated differentially by the three diversity dimensions only for lateral relations. These findings offer important managerial insights about hospitals’ efforts to improve potentially conflicting performance outcomes and suggest interesting opportunities for future research applying IPT to this important topic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
DECISION SCIENCES
DECISION SCIENCES MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: Decision Sciences, a premier journal of the Decision Sciences Institute, publishes scholarly research about decision making within the boundaries of an organization, as well as decisions involving inter-firm coordination. The journal promotes research advancing decision making at the interfaces of business functions and organizational boundaries. The journal also seeks articles extending established lines of work assuming the results of the research have the potential to substantially impact either decision making theory or industry practice. Ground-breaking research articles that enhance managerial understanding of decision making processes and stimulate further research in multi-disciplinary domains are particularly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信