ORP不应用于估计或比较水溶液中H2的浓度:计算机分析和叙述摘要

Tyler W LeBaron, Randy Sharpe
{"title":"ORP不应用于估计或比较水溶液中H2的浓度:计算机分析和叙述摘要","authors":"Tyler W LeBaron, Randy Sharpe","doi":"10.3389/frfst.2022.1007001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Oxidation reduction potential (ORP) has become a commonly used measurement to characterize functional beverages, specifically alkaline ionized water and hydrogen water. Numerous health benefits including antioxidant effects have been attributed to a negative ORP value. A greater negative ORP value is often incorrectly interpreted to mean a greater degree of health benefits and/or a high concentration of H2. Some hydrogen meters use the Nernst equation to calculate the concentration of H2 based on the measured ORP value. Unfortunately, due to the fundamental issues with the ORP meter, the calculated H2 value may be very inaccurate. Using the Nernst equation, we performed an in silico analysis of the ORP as a function of pH, temperature, and H2 concentration. Our analysis shows that a one unit increase in pH (e.g., 7–8) influences the ORP by as much as increasing the H2 concentration by 100 times (e.g., 1–100 mg/L). Similarly, at a saturated H2 concentration (1.57 mg/L) and pH 7, every ∆T of 20 °C changes the ORP by ≈ 30 mV. This is comparable to changing the H2 concentration by a factor of 10 (0.1 mg/L to 1 mg/L). Finally, to measure H2 within 0.1 mg/L, ORP meters need to have an accuracy of about 0.8 mV. However, ORP meters have an error range of at least ±10 mV, which corresponds to a potential error in measured H2 concentration of nearly 2 mg/L (≈125% error). This analysis shows that pH, temperature, and the intrinsic ORP errors can individually influence the ORP greater than the entire contribution of dissolved H2 within normally used ranges. In fact, this can easily result in a water sample with a greater negative ORP than another despite having significantly less H2. This makes it impossible to consistently determine if one water sample has more H2 than another water sample. Therefore, we can only conclude, based on a negative ORP reading, that, excluding the possibility of other reductive redox couples, some level of dissolved H2 is present in the water. Accordingly, ORP and ORP-based H2 meters are not recommended for testing or comparing the concentration of H2 in water. Experimental studies are warranted to determine if the ORP error is as great as or greater than what is predicted via this in silico analysis.","PeriodicalId":93753,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in food science and technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ORP should not be used to estimate or compare concentrations of aqueous H2: An in silico analysis and narrative synopsis\",\"authors\":\"Tyler W LeBaron, Randy Sharpe\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/frfst.2022.1007001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Oxidation reduction potential (ORP) has become a commonly used measurement to characterize functional beverages, specifically alkaline ionized water and hydrogen water. Numerous health benefits including antioxidant effects have been attributed to a negative ORP value. A greater negative ORP value is often incorrectly interpreted to mean a greater degree of health benefits and/or a high concentration of H2. Some hydrogen meters use the Nernst equation to calculate the concentration of H2 based on the measured ORP value. Unfortunately, due to the fundamental issues with the ORP meter, the calculated H2 value may be very inaccurate. Using the Nernst equation, we performed an in silico analysis of the ORP as a function of pH, temperature, and H2 concentration. Our analysis shows that a one unit increase in pH (e.g., 7–8) influences the ORP by as much as increasing the H2 concentration by 100 times (e.g., 1–100 mg/L). Similarly, at a saturated H2 concentration (1.57 mg/L) and pH 7, every ∆T of 20 °C changes the ORP by ≈ 30 mV. This is comparable to changing the H2 concentration by a factor of 10 (0.1 mg/L to 1 mg/L). Finally, to measure H2 within 0.1 mg/L, ORP meters need to have an accuracy of about 0.8 mV. However, ORP meters have an error range of at least ±10 mV, which corresponds to a potential error in measured H2 concentration of nearly 2 mg/L (≈125% error). This analysis shows that pH, temperature, and the intrinsic ORP errors can individually influence the ORP greater than the entire contribution of dissolved H2 within normally used ranges. In fact, this can easily result in a water sample with a greater negative ORP than another despite having significantly less H2. This makes it impossible to consistently determine if one water sample has more H2 than another water sample. Therefore, we can only conclude, based on a negative ORP reading, that, excluding the possibility of other reductive redox couples, some level of dissolved H2 is present in the water. Accordingly, ORP and ORP-based H2 meters are not recommended for testing or comparing the concentration of H2 in water. Experimental studies are warranted to determine if the ORP error is as great as or greater than what is predicted via this in silico analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93753,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in food science and technology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in food science and technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/frfst.2022.1007001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in food science and technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frfst.2022.1007001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

氧化还原电位(ORP)已成为表征功能饮料的常用测量方法,特别是碱性离子水和氢水。包括抗氧化作用在内的许多健康益处都归因于负ORP值。更大的负ORP值通常被错误地解释为意味着更大程度的健康益处和/或高浓度的H2。一些氢气计使用能斯特方程基于测量的ORP值来计算H2的浓度。不幸的是,由于ORP计的基本问题,计算的H2值可能非常不准确。使用能斯特方程,我们对ORP作为pH、温度和H2浓度的函数进行了计算机分析。我们的分析表明,pH值增加一个单位(例如,7-8)对ORP的影响相当于H2浓度增加100倍(例如,1-100 mg/L)。类似地,在饱和H2浓度(1.57 mg/L)和pH为7的情况下,20°C的∆T每改变一次ORP≈30 mV。这相当于将H2浓度改变10倍(0.1 mg/L至1 mg/L)。最后,要测量0.1 mg/L范围内的H2,ORP计需要具有约0.8 mV的精度。然而,ORP仪的误差范围至少为±10 mV,这对应于测量的H2浓度的潜在误差接近2 mg/L(≈125%误差)。该分析表明,在正常使用范围内,pH、温度和固有ORP误差对ORP的单独影响大于溶解H2的全部贡献。事实上,这可以容易地导致水样具有比另一个更大的负ORP,尽管其具有显著更少的H2。这使得不可能一致地确定一个水样是否比另一个水样具有更多的H2。因此,我们只能根据负ORP读数得出结论,排除其他还原性氧化还原对的可能性,水中存在一定水平的溶解H2。因此,不建议使用ORP和基于ORP的H2计来测试或比较水中H2的浓度。有必要进行实验研究,以确定ORP误差是否与通过这种计算机分析预测的误差一样大或更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ORP should not be used to estimate or compare concentrations of aqueous H2: An in silico analysis and narrative synopsis
Oxidation reduction potential (ORP) has become a commonly used measurement to characterize functional beverages, specifically alkaline ionized water and hydrogen water. Numerous health benefits including antioxidant effects have been attributed to a negative ORP value. A greater negative ORP value is often incorrectly interpreted to mean a greater degree of health benefits and/or a high concentration of H2. Some hydrogen meters use the Nernst equation to calculate the concentration of H2 based on the measured ORP value. Unfortunately, due to the fundamental issues with the ORP meter, the calculated H2 value may be very inaccurate. Using the Nernst equation, we performed an in silico analysis of the ORP as a function of pH, temperature, and H2 concentration. Our analysis shows that a one unit increase in pH (e.g., 7–8) influences the ORP by as much as increasing the H2 concentration by 100 times (e.g., 1–100 mg/L). Similarly, at a saturated H2 concentration (1.57 mg/L) and pH 7, every ∆T of 20 °C changes the ORP by ≈ 30 mV. This is comparable to changing the H2 concentration by a factor of 10 (0.1 mg/L to 1 mg/L). Finally, to measure H2 within 0.1 mg/L, ORP meters need to have an accuracy of about 0.8 mV. However, ORP meters have an error range of at least ±10 mV, which corresponds to a potential error in measured H2 concentration of nearly 2 mg/L (≈125% error). This analysis shows that pH, temperature, and the intrinsic ORP errors can individually influence the ORP greater than the entire contribution of dissolved H2 within normally used ranges. In fact, this can easily result in a water sample with a greater negative ORP than another despite having significantly less H2. This makes it impossible to consistently determine if one water sample has more H2 than another water sample. Therefore, we can only conclude, based on a negative ORP reading, that, excluding the possibility of other reductive redox couples, some level of dissolved H2 is present in the water. Accordingly, ORP and ORP-based H2 meters are not recommended for testing or comparing the concentration of H2 in water. Experimental studies are warranted to determine if the ORP error is as great as or greater than what is predicted via this in silico analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信