一项回顾性研究显示,吸烟者和非吸烟者的周期阈值和2019年冠状病毒病临床类型没有显著关联,尽管临床类型显示吸烟者处于高风险中

IF 1 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
A. Azad, Suboor Naik, A. Malik, Varshiesh Raina
{"title":"一项回顾性研究显示,吸烟者和非吸烟者的周期阈值和2019年冠状病毒病临床类型没有显著关联,尽管临床类型显示吸烟者处于高风险中","authors":"A. Azad, Suboor Naik, A. Malik, Varshiesh Raina","doi":"10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_86_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Emerging epidemiological studies indicate a paradoxical association between smoking and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This retrospective study aimed to investigate the association between cycle threshold (Ct) values and clinical type among COVID-19-positive smokers and nonsmokers. Methods: The study was conducted from October 3, 2020, to October 3, 2022. Five hundred and sixty COVID-19 patients were enrolled, which included 320 smoking group (SG) and 240 non-SG (NSG). Demographic and clinical features were acquired, and comparison was based drawn on gender, age, Ct range, and clinical type (mild/mild-moderate/severe COVID-19). COVID-19 was confirmed by real time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test based on Ct value below 35. Results: Initial evaluation revealed no significant association between Ct range and clinical type either within or between SG and NSG. Follow-up at 7/14 days revealed no significant difference between the groups for Ct range/clinical type; however, within groups Ct range showed a clear change towards higher values. The recovery rate was also evaluated which displayed no difference at 7 days while at 14 days' recover rate was 47.5% for SG and 80.0% for NSG. Moreover, in both groups un-recovered patients were mostly observed either in mild-moderate and severe COVID state; however, SG showed more patients in mild-moderate group and longer discharge time. Conclusions: We found that Ct value and clinical type have no significant association in COVID-19 smokers versus nonsmokers and smokers are at high risk and take a longer time to recover from COVID.","PeriodicalId":36500,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cycle threshold value and coronavirus disease 2019 clinical type among smokers and nonsmokers reveal no significant association despite clinical type shows smokers are at high risk: A retrospective study\",\"authors\":\"A. Azad, Suboor Naik, A. Malik, Varshiesh Raina\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_86_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Emerging epidemiological studies indicate a paradoxical association between smoking and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This retrospective study aimed to investigate the association between cycle threshold (Ct) values and clinical type among COVID-19-positive smokers and nonsmokers. Methods: The study was conducted from October 3, 2020, to October 3, 2022. Five hundred and sixty COVID-19 patients were enrolled, which included 320 smoking group (SG) and 240 non-SG (NSG). Demographic and clinical features were acquired, and comparison was based drawn on gender, age, Ct range, and clinical type (mild/mild-moderate/severe COVID-19). COVID-19 was confirmed by real time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test based on Ct value below 35. Results: Initial evaluation revealed no significant association between Ct range and clinical type either within or between SG and NSG. Follow-up at 7/14 days revealed no significant difference between the groups for Ct range/clinical type; however, within groups Ct range showed a clear change towards higher values. The recovery rate was also evaluated which displayed no difference at 7 days while at 14 days' recover rate was 47.5% for SG and 80.0% for NSG. Moreover, in both groups un-recovered patients were mostly observed either in mild-moderate and severe COVID state; however, SG showed more patients in mild-moderate group and longer discharge time. Conclusions: We found that Ct value and clinical type have no significant association in COVID-19 smokers versus nonsmokers and smokers are at high risk and take a longer time to recover from COVID.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_86_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_86_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新出现的流行病学研究表明,吸烟与2019年冠状病毒病(新冠肺炎)之间存在矛盾的关联。这项回顾性研究旨在调查COVID-19阳性吸烟者和非吸烟者的周期阈值(Ct)值与临床类型之间的关系。方法:本研究于2020年10月3日至2022年10月30日进行。560名新冠肺炎患者入选,其中包括320名吸烟组(SG)和240名非吸烟组(NSG)。获取人口统计学和临床特征,并根据性别、年龄、Ct范围和临床类型(轻度/轻度-中度/重度新冠肺炎)进行比较。基于Ct值低于35,通过实时逆转录聚合酶链反应检测确诊新冠肺炎。结果:初步评估显示,无论是SG还是NSG,Ct范围与临床类型之间都没有显著关联。在7/14天的随访显示,两组之间的Ct范围/临床类型没有显著差异;然而,在组内Ct范围显示出向更高值的明显变化。还评估了恢复率,在7天时没有显示出差异,而在14天时,SG和NSG的恢复率分别为47.5%和80.0%。此外,在两组中,未康复的患者大多处于轻度、中度和重度新冠肺炎状态;轻度-中度组SG患者较多,出院时间较长。结论:我们发现,在新冠肺炎吸烟者与非吸烟者中,Ct值和临床类型没有显著关联,吸烟者处于高风险状态,需要更长的时间才能从COVID中恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cycle threshold value and coronavirus disease 2019 clinical type among smokers and nonsmokers reveal no significant association despite clinical type shows smokers are at high risk: A retrospective study
Background: Emerging epidemiological studies indicate a paradoxical association between smoking and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This retrospective study aimed to investigate the association between cycle threshold (Ct) values and clinical type among COVID-19-positive smokers and nonsmokers. Methods: The study was conducted from October 3, 2020, to October 3, 2022. Five hundred and sixty COVID-19 patients were enrolled, which included 320 smoking group (SG) and 240 non-SG (NSG). Demographic and clinical features were acquired, and comparison was based drawn on gender, age, Ct range, and clinical type (mild/mild-moderate/severe COVID-19). COVID-19 was confirmed by real time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction test based on Ct value below 35. Results: Initial evaluation revealed no significant association between Ct range and clinical type either within or between SG and NSG. Follow-up at 7/14 days revealed no significant difference between the groups for Ct range/clinical type; however, within groups Ct range showed a clear change towards higher values. The recovery rate was also evaluated which displayed no difference at 7 days while at 14 days' recover rate was 47.5% for SG and 80.0% for NSG. Moreover, in both groups un-recovered patients were mostly observed either in mild-moderate and severe COVID state; however, SG showed more patients in mild-moderate group and longer discharge time. Conclusions: We found that Ct value and clinical type have no significant association in COVID-19 smokers versus nonsmokers and smokers are at high risk and take a longer time to recover from COVID.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal
Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
42.90%
发文量
24
审稿时长
11 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信