{"title":"人工智能、制度和韧性:城市的前景和挑战","authors":"Laurie A. Schintler, Connie L. McNeely","doi":"10.1016/j.jum.2022.05.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The notion of “smart city” incorporates promises of urban resilience, referring generally to capacities for cities to anticipate, absorb, react, respond, and reorganize in the face of disruptive changes and disturbances. As such, artificial intelligence (AI), coupled with big data, is being heralded as a means for enhancing and accessing key determinants of resilience. At the same time, while AI generally has been extolled for contributions to urban resilience, less attention has been paid to the other side of the equation — i.e., to the ethical, governance, and social downsides of AI and big data that can operate to hinder or compromise resilience. With particular attention to relevant institutional dynamics and features, an encompassing and systemic conception of smart and resilient cities is delineated as a critical lens for viewing and analyzing complex instrumental and intrinsic aspects of the relationship between AI and resilience. As a broader contribution to the literature, a set of structural, process, and outcome conditions are offered for engaging and assessing linkages inherent in the use of AI relative to urban resilience in terms of absorptive capacity, speed of recovery, over-optimization avoidance, and creative destruction, especially as regards impacts on relevant practices, standards, and policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45131,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Management","volume":"11 2","pages":"Pages 256-268"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2226585622000322/pdfft?md5=0ff49d8500a2d091a8dcd6f7c14bc72d&pid=1-s2.0-S2226585622000322-main.pdf","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Artificial intelligence, institutions, and resilience: Prospects and provocations for cities\",\"authors\":\"Laurie A. Schintler, Connie L. McNeely\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jum.2022.05.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The notion of “smart city” incorporates promises of urban resilience, referring generally to capacities for cities to anticipate, absorb, react, respond, and reorganize in the face of disruptive changes and disturbances. As such, artificial intelligence (AI), coupled with big data, is being heralded as a means for enhancing and accessing key determinants of resilience. At the same time, while AI generally has been extolled for contributions to urban resilience, less attention has been paid to the other side of the equation — i.e., to the ethical, governance, and social downsides of AI and big data that can operate to hinder or compromise resilience. With particular attention to relevant institutional dynamics and features, an encompassing and systemic conception of smart and resilient cities is delineated as a critical lens for viewing and analyzing complex instrumental and intrinsic aspects of the relationship between AI and resilience. As a broader contribution to the literature, a set of structural, process, and outcome conditions are offered for engaging and assessing linkages inherent in the use of AI relative to urban resilience in terms of absorptive capacity, speed of recovery, over-optimization avoidance, and creative destruction, especially as regards impacts on relevant practices, standards, and policies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45131,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Management\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 256-268\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2226585622000322/pdfft?md5=0ff49d8500a2d091a8dcd6f7c14bc72d&pid=1-s2.0-S2226585622000322-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2226585622000322\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Management","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2226585622000322","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Artificial intelligence, institutions, and resilience: Prospects and provocations for cities
The notion of “smart city” incorporates promises of urban resilience, referring generally to capacities for cities to anticipate, absorb, react, respond, and reorganize in the face of disruptive changes and disturbances. As such, artificial intelligence (AI), coupled with big data, is being heralded as a means for enhancing and accessing key determinants of resilience. At the same time, while AI generally has been extolled for contributions to urban resilience, less attention has been paid to the other side of the equation — i.e., to the ethical, governance, and social downsides of AI and big data that can operate to hinder or compromise resilience. With particular attention to relevant institutional dynamics and features, an encompassing and systemic conception of smart and resilient cities is delineated as a critical lens for viewing and analyzing complex instrumental and intrinsic aspects of the relationship between AI and resilience. As a broader contribution to the literature, a set of structural, process, and outcome conditions are offered for engaging and assessing linkages inherent in the use of AI relative to urban resilience in terms of absorptive capacity, speed of recovery, over-optimization avoidance, and creative destruction, especially as regards impacts on relevant practices, standards, and policies.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Urban Management (JUM) is the Official Journal of Zhejiang University and the Chinese Association of Urban Management, an international, peer-reviewed open access journal covering planning, administering, regulating, and governing urban complexity.
JUM has its two-fold aims set to integrate the studies across fields in urban planning and management, as well as to provide a more holistic perspective on problem solving.
1) Explore innovative management skills for taming thorny problems that arise with global urbanization
2) Provide a platform to deal with urban affairs whose solutions must be looked at from an interdisciplinary perspective.