{"title":"华盛顿东部葡萄园三种商业喷雾技术的评估","authors":"Mary L. McCoy, G. Hoheisel, L. Khot, M. Moyer","doi":"10.5344/ajev.2021.20058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Washington winegrape growers are rapidly adopting vineyard management technologies such as mechanical pruners and harvesters, but they have been slower to adopt new chemical application technologies. This study generated technical information about commercial over-the-row sprayers and their deposition and drift to allow growers to select and optimize sprayers for different vineyard systems and winegrape canopies. Three commercial sprayer technologies (multi-fan heads, pneumatic, and electrostatic) were evaluated for canopy deposition and drift in the 2016 and 2017 production seasons. Data were collected in Vitis vinifera Chardonnay and Riesling vineyards at two application timings, early season and midseason, to determine sprayer deposition patterns in opposed and unopposed applications and in-field aerial and ground drifts. All sprayer technologies showed consistent in-canopy deposition and drift patterns at both application timings. Regardless of sprayer technology, the most deposition was in the upper canopy rather than in the fruiting zone. Similarly, the most aerial and ground drift occurred in the row closest to the sprayed row, indicating that drift is relatively low with all three evaluated sprayer technologies.","PeriodicalId":7461,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Enology and Viticulture","volume":"72 1","pages":"217 - 229"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Three Commercial Over-the-Row Sprayer Technologies in Eastern Washington Vineyards\",\"authors\":\"Mary L. McCoy, G. Hoheisel, L. Khot, M. Moyer\",\"doi\":\"10.5344/ajev.2021.20058\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Washington winegrape growers are rapidly adopting vineyard management technologies such as mechanical pruners and harvesters, but they have been slower to adopt new chemical application technologies. This study generated technical information about commercial over-the-row sprayers and their deposition and drift to allow growers to select and optimize sprayers for different vineyard systems and winegrape canopies. Three commercial sprayer technologies (multi-fan heads, pneumatic, and electrostatic) were evaluated for canopy deposition and drift in the 2016 and 2017 production seasons. Data were collected in Vitis vinifera Chardonnay and Riesling vineyards at two application timings, early season and midseason, to determine sprayer deposition patterns in opposed and unopposed applications and in-field aerial and ground drifts. All sprayer technologies showed consistent in-canopy deposition and drift patterns at both application timings. Regardless of sprayer technology, the most deposition was in the upper canopy rather than in the fruiting zone. Similarly, the most aerial and ground drift occurred in the row closest to the sprayed row, indicating that drift is relatively low with all three evaluated sprayer technologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7461,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Enology and Viticulture\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"217 - 229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Enology and Viticulture\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2021.20058\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Enology and Viticulture","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5344/ajev.2021.20058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessment of Three Commercial Over-the-Row Sprayer Technologies in Eastern Washington Vineyards
Washington winegrape growers are rapidly adopting vineyard management technologies such as mechanical pruners and harvesters, but they have been slower to adopt new chemical application technologies. This study generated technical information about commercial over-the-row sprayers and their deposition and drift to allow growers to select and optimize sprayers for different vineyard systems and winegrape canopies. Three commercial sprayer technologies (multi-fan heads, pneumatic, and electrostatic) were evaluated for canopy deposition and drift in the 2016 and 2017 production seasons. Data were collected in Vitis vinifera Chardonnay and Riesling vineyards at two application timings, early season and midseason, to determine sprayer deposition patterns in opposed and unopposed applications and in-field aerial and ground drifts. All sprayer technologies showed consistent in-canopy deposition and drift patterns at both application timings. Regardless of sprayer technology, the most deposition was in the upper canopy rather than in the fruiting zone. Similarly, the most aerial and ground drift occurred in the row closest to the sprayed row, indicating that drift is relatively low with all three evaluated sprayer technologies.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Enology and Viticulture (AJEV), published quarterly, is an official journal of the American Society for Enology and Viticulture (ASEV) and is the premier journal in the English language dedicated to scientific research on winemaking and grapegrowing. AJEV publishes full-length research papers, literature reviews, research notes, and technical briefs on various aspects of enology and viticulture, including wine chemistry, sensory science, process engineering, wine quality assessments, microbiology, methods development, plant pathogenesis, diseases and pests of grape, rootstock and clonal evaluation, effect of field practices, and grape genetics and breeding. All papers are peer reviewed, and authorship of papers is not limited to members of ASEV. The science editor, along with the viticulture, enology, and associate editors, are drawn from academic and research institutions worldwide and guide the content of the Journal.