穿越工作的世界:教育是伟大的均衡器的神话

IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
S. Masyada
{"title":"穿越工作的世界:教育是伟大的均衡器的神话","authors":"S. Masyada","doi":"10.1080/00933104.2022.2085025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 1647, the Massachusetts Bay colony implemented the Old Deluder Satan Law. This law was the first conceptualizing public education for civic (and religious) purposes, requiring that every town with at least 50 households appoint a publicly funded teacher to help children learn to read and write, and communities double that size had to ensure that a grammar school existed. More than a century later, Benjamin Rush and Thomas Jefferson would be among the Founding Fathers to describe some form of public education as a necessary component of democratic citizenship education (though for a very narrow slice of the population, admittedly). Eventually, Horace Mann (1849), the first secretary of education in Massachusetts, established a series of public schools throughout the state, led by the belief that public schools would serve as the “great equalizer of the conditions of men, the balance wheel of the social machinery” (p. 59). It is this conception of the purpose and benefit of public schools that has carried over into the conventional wisdom of the present day, at least among the general public. But should it? In The Education Trap: Schooling and the Remaking of Equality in Boston, Cristina Viviana Groeger suggests that the answer is far more complex than we think.","PeriodicalId":46808,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Research in Social Education","volume":"51 1","pages":"497 - 502"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Moving through the worlds of work: The myth of education as the great equalizer\",\"authors\":\"S. Masyada\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00933104.2022.2085025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 1647, the Massachusetts Bay colony implemented the Old Deluder Satan Law. This law was the first conceptualizing public education for civic (and religious) purposes, requiring that every town with at least 50 households appoint a publicly funded teacher to help children learn to read and write, and communities double that size had to ensure that a grammar school existed. More than a century later, Benjamin Rush and Thomas Jefferson would be among the Founding Fathers to describe some form of public education as a necessary component of democratic citizenship education (though for a very narrow slice of the population, admittedly). Eventually, Horace Mann (1849), the first secretary of education in Massachusetts, established a series of public schools throughout the state, led by the belief that public schools would serve as the “great equalizer of the conditions of men, the balance wheel of the social machinery” (p. 59). It is this conception of the purpose and benefit of public schools that has carried over into the conventional wisdom of the present day, at least among the general public. But should it? In The Education Trap: Schooling and the Remaking of Equality in Boston, Cristina Viviana Groeger suggests that the answer is far more complex than we think.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Research in Social Education\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"497 - 502\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Research in Social Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2022.2085025\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Research in Social Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2022.2085025","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1647年,马萨诸塞湾殖民地实施了《旧德卢德撒旦法》。这项法律是第一个将公民(和宗教)目的的公共教育概念化的法律,要求每个至少有50户家庭的城镇都任命一名公共资助的教师来帮助孩子们学习读写,而规模翻倍的社区必须确保有一所文法学校。一个多世纪后,本杰明·拉什(Benjamin Rush)和托马斯·杰斐逊(Thomas Jefferson。最终,马萨诸塞州第一任教育部长Horace Mann(1849)在全州建立了一系列公立学校,其理念是公立学校将成为“人类条件的伟大均衡器,社会机器的平衡轮”(第59页)。正是这种对公立学校的目的和利益的概念,至少在普通公众中,延续到了当今的传统智慧中。但应该这样吗?Cristina Viviana Groeger在《教育陷阱:波士顿的学校教育与平等重塑》一书中指出,答案远比我们想象的复杂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Moving through the worlds of work: The myth of education as the great equalizer
In 1647, the Massachusetts Bay colony implemented the Old Deluder Satan Law. This law was the first conceptualizing public education for civic (and religious) purposes, requiring that every town with at least 50 households appoint a publicly funded teacher to help children learn to read and write, and communities double that size had to ensure that a grammar school existed. More than a century later, Benjamin Rush and Thomas Jefferson would be among the Founding Fathers to describe some form of public education as a necessary component of democratic citizenship education (though for a very narrow slice of the population, admittedly). Eventually, Horace Mann (1849), the first secretary of education in Massachusetts, established a series of public schools throughout the state, led by the belief that public schools would serve as the “great equalizer of the conditions of men, the balance wheel of the social machinery” (p. 59). It is this conception of the purpose and benefit of public schools that has carried over into the conventional wisdom of the present day, at least among the general public. But should it? In The Education Trap: Schooling and the Remaking of Equality in Boston, Cristina Viviana Groeger suggests that the answer is far more complex than we think.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theory and Research in Social Education
Theory and Research in Social Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
30.80%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信