教师在面对极端言论时加强游戏:敏感话题教学中教育摩擦的定性分析

IF 2.5 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
S. L. Parra, B. Wansink, C. Bakker, L. M. van Liere
{"title":"教师在面对极端言论时加强游戏:敏感话题教学中教育摩擦的定性分析","authors":"S. L. Parra, B. Wansink, C. Bakker, L. M. van Liere","doi":"10.1080/00933104.2022.2145923","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Friction in the classroom may create useful tension for teachers when they attempt to discuss sensitive topics as part of democratic learning. Due to the openness and indeterminacy of these topics, students can experience what it is like to be (political) subjects in a diverse society and become aware of other people’s subjectness in a charged classroom. To better understand how to handle educational friction in the classroom, we observed and interviewed nine Dutch expert teachers and analyzed the empirical data by using our Educational Friction Modelling Framework as a heuristic lens. This study shows how teachers allowed extreme statements and used the subsequent friction during their lessons, challenged and provoked their students, made room for their pupils in several ways to enhance their participation, and made a distinction between rationality and emotions in the classroom. We argue that our framework sheds light on what charges the classroom and contributes to the further development of contained risk-taking as part of democratic education.","PeriodicalId":46808,"journal":{"name":"Theory and Research in Social Education","volume":"51 1","pages":"201 - 232"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teachers stepping up their game in the face of extreme statements: A qualitative analysis of educational friction when teaching sensitive topics\",\"authors\":\"S. L. Parra, B. Wansink, C. Bakker, L. M. van Liere\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00933104.2022.2145923\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Friction in the classroom may create useful tension for teachers when they attempt to discuss sensitive topics as part of democratic learning. Due to the openness and indeterminacy of these topics, students can experience what it is like to be (political) subjects in a diverse society and become aware of other people’s subjectness in a charged classroom. To better understand how to handle educational friction in the classroom, we observed and interviewed nine Dutch expert teachers and analyzed the empirical data by using our Educational Friction Modelling Framework as a heuristic lens. This study shows how teachers allowed extreme statements and used the subsequent friction during their lessons, challenged and provoked their students, made room for their pupils in several ways to enhance their participation, and made a distinction between rationality and emotions in the classroom. We argue that our framework sheds light on what charges the classroom and contributes to the further development of contained risk-taking as part of democratic education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46808,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theory and Research in Social Education\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"201 - 232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theory and Research in Social Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2022.2145923\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theory and Research in Social Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00933104.2022.2145923","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要:当教师试图将敏感话题作为民主学习的一部分进行讨论时,课堂上的摩擦可能会给他们带来有益的紧张气氛。由于这些主题的开放性和不确定性,学生可以体验在多元化社会中成为(政治)主体的感觉,并在充满活力的课堂中意识到他人的主体性。为了更好地理解如何处理课堂上的教育摩擦,我们观察并采访了九位荷兰专家教师,并使用我们的教育摩擦建模框架作为启发式视角分析了经验数据。这项研究表明,教师如何在课堂上允许极端言论并利用随后的摩擦,挑战和挑衅学生,以多种方式为学生腾出空间来提高他们的参与度,并在课堂上区分理性和情绪。我们认为,我们的框架揭示了课堂的收费,并有助于进一步发展作为民主教育一部分的克制冒险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Teachers stepping up their game in the face of extreme statements: A qualitative analysis of educational friction when teaching sensitive topics
ABSTRACT Friction in the classroom may create useful tension for teachers when they attempt to discuss sensitive topics as part of democratic learning. Due to the openness and indeterminacy of these topics, students can experience what it is like to be (political) subjects in a diverse society and become aware of other people’s subjectness in a charged classroom. To better understand how to handle educational friction in the classroom, we observed and interviewed nine Dutch expert teachers and analyzed the empirical data by using our Educational Friction Modelling Framework as a heuristic lens. This study shows how teachers allowed extreme statements and used the subsequent friction during their lessons, challenged and provoked their students, made room for their pupils in several ways to enhance their participation, and made a distinction between rationality and emotions in the classroom. We argue that our framework sheds light on what charges the classroom and contributes to the further development of contained risk-taking as part of democratic education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Theory and Research in Social Education
Theory and Research in Social Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
30.80%
发文量
36
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信