教育陷阱:波士顿的学校和不平等的重塑

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
L. Kenny
{"title":"教育陷阱:波士顿的学校和不平等的重塑","authors":"L. Kenny","doi":"10.1080/00131725.2021.1894068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"preferred sports and fraternities rather than wearing bell-bottom jeans or trying LSD. And in addition to more social history, The Lost Promise could have explored what happened in professional schools. Protests in colleges of education? MBA programs? Medical schools? Law schools beyond Yale? (Laura Kalman’s excellent 2006 Yale Law School and the Sixties described substantial dissent over race, governance, teaching methods, and courses.) A full defense of Schrecker’s title would also take more space. The post-World War II “promise”—higher education deserves to expand rapidly because it offers upward mobility at a reasonable cost—faded quickly after the 1960s, she claims. To make the case that higher education faltered—and to connect that decline with the late 1960s— would take several chapters. As she acknowledged during a Roosevelt House panel discussion on December 17, 2021, “the real title of the book is A Political History of American Higher Education during the Long 1960s.” Her epilogue is too brief to clinch the case that public confidence and policy support plunged, permanently, as a result of a few stormy years. Whatever the need to say more, Schrecker packs a great deal of important information in this well-written book. Instructors of survey courses will find it essential preparation for their week on the 1960s—this book will jog the memory and fill gaps. For graduate seminars, faculty could assign The Lost Promise along with John Thelin’s shorter but broader Going to College in the Sixties (2018) and, for a case study, Donald Alexander Downs’s Cornell ’69 (2014). Rather than quarrel about which one is best, the instructor can remind the seminar that one legacy of the 1960s is greater tolerance.","PeriodicalId":46482,"journal":{"name":"EDUCATIONAL FORUM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00131725.2021.1894068","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Education Trap: Schools and the Remaking of Inequality in Boston\",\"authors\":\"L. Kenny\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00131725.2021.1894068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"preferred sports and fraternities rather than wearing bell-bottom jeans or trying LSD. And in addition to more social history, The Lost Promise could have explored what happened in professional schools. Protests in colleges of education? MBA programs? Medical schools? Law schools beyond Yale? (Laura Kalman’s excellent 2006 Yale Law School and the Sixties described substantial dissent over race, governance, teaching methods, and courses.) A full defense of Schrecker’s title would also take more space. The post-World War II “promise”—higher education deserves to expand rapidly because it offers upward mobility at a reasonable cost—faded quickly after the 1960s, she claims. To make the case that higher education faltered—and to connect that decline with the late 1960s— would take several chapters. As she acknowledged during a Roosevelt House panel discussion on December 17, 2021, “the real title of the book is A Political History of American Higher Education during the Long 1960s.” Her epilogue is too brief to clinch the case that public confidence and policy support plunged, permanently, as a result of a few stormy years. Whatever the need to say more, Schrecker packs a great deal of important information in this well-written book. Instructors of survey courses will find it essential preparation for their week on the 1960s—this book will jog the memory and fill gaps. For graduate seminars, faculty could assign The Lost Promise along with John Thelin’s shorter but broader Going to College in the Sixties (2018) and, for a case study, Donald Alexander Downs’s Cornell ’69 (2014). Rather than quarrel about which one is best, the instructor can remind the seminar that one legacy of the 1960s is greater tolerance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EDUCATIONAL FORUM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00131725.2021.1894068\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EDUCATIONAL FORUM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2021.1894068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDUCATIONAL FORUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2021.1894068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

更喜欢运动和兄弟会,而不是穿喇叭裤或尝试迷幻药。除了更多的社会历史,《失落的诺言》还可以探讨职业学校发生的事情。教育学院的抗议?MBA项目吗?医学院吗?耶鲁大学以外的法学院?(劳拉·卡尔曼(Laura Kalman)在2006年的《耶鲁法学院与60年代》一书中出色地描述了种族、治理、教学方法和课程等方面的重大分歧。)全面捍卫施雷克的头衔也需要更多的篇幅。她声称,二战后的“承诺”——高等教育应该迅速扩张,因为它以合理的成本提供向上流动——在20世纪60年代后迅速消退。要证明高等教育的衰落——并将这种衰落与20世纪60年代末联系起来——需要好几章的篇幅。正如她在2021年12月17日的罗斯福府小组讨论中所承认的那样,“这本书的真正标题是《漫长的20世纪60年代美国高等教育的政治史》。”她的结束语过于简短,无法证明公众信心和政策支持由于几年的风雨而永久地下降。不管需要说什么,Schrecker在这本写得很好的书中包含了大量重要的信息。调查课程的讲师会发现这本书是他们上世纪60年代的必备品——这本书将唤起人们的记忆,填补空白。在研究生研讨会上,教师可以将《失去的希望》与约翰·特林的《60年代上大学》(2018年)和唐纳德·亚历山大·唐斯的《69年的康奈尔》(2014年)结合起来进行案例研究。与其争论哪一个是最好的,讲师可以提醒研讨会上的人,20世纪60年代的遗产之一是更大的宽容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Education Trap: Schools and the Remaking of Inequality in Boston
preferred sports and fraternities rather than wearing bell-bottom jeans or trying LSD. And in addition to more social history, The Lost Promise could have explored what happened in professional schools. Protests in colleges of education? MBA programs? Medical schools? Law schools beyond Yale? (Laura Kalman’s excellent 2006 Yale Law School and the Sixties described substantial dissent over race, governance, teaching methods, and courses.) A full defense of Schrecker’s title would also take more space. The post-World War II “promise”—higher education deserves to expand rapidly because it offers upward mobility at a reasonable cost—faded quickly after the 1960s, she claims. To make the case that higher education faltered—and to connect that decline with the late 1960s— would take several chapters. As she acknowledged during a Roosevelt House panel discussion on December 17, 2021, “the real title of the book is A Political History of American Higher Education during the Long 1960s.” Her epilogue is too brief to clinch the case that public confidence and policy support plunged, permanently, as a result of a few stormy years. Whatever the need to say more, Schrecker packs a great deal of important information in this well-written book. Instructors of survey courses will find it essential preparation for their week on the 1960s—this book will jog the memory and fill gaps. For graduate seminars, faculty could assign The Lost Promise along with John Thelin’s shorter but broader Going to College in the Sixties (2018) and, for a case study, Donald Alexander Downs’s Cornell ’69 (2014). Rather than quarrel about which one is best, the instructor can remind the seminar that one legacy of the 1960s is greater tolerance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EDUCATIONAL FORUM
EDUCATIONAL FORUM EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
29
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信