Brian D. Blume, Jason L. Huang, Zhonghao Wang, J. Kevin Ford
{"title":"促进混合训练的转移:任务团队的责任感和主管支持的互动","authors":"Brian D. Blume, Jason L. Huang, Zhonghao Wang, J. Kevin Ford","doi":"10.1002/hrdq.21473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research on training has accumulated knowledge of factors influencing transfer of training. However, little is known about how these factors interact to impact training activity level and training transfer. Based on recent advances in the contingency approach to personality, we examine person–situation interaction by testing how task-contingent conscientiousness influences trainees to utilize supervisor support differently during training and transfer. We situate the current investigation in hybrid management training courses where a field sample of employees (<i>N</i> = 200) first attended required in-person workshops and then received voluntary online modules. Results show that task-contingent conscientiousness moderated both the linkage between supervisor support and training activity level and the linkage between training activity level and transfer of training. Specifically, for trainees with higher task-contingent conscientiousness, supervisor support tended to have a stronger association with training activity level, and training activity level tended to translate into more transfer of training. Our findings provide unique insights into when supervisor support may be more beneficial depending on trainees' individual differences. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of this research.</p>","PeriodicalId":47803,"journal":{"name":"Human Resource Development Quarterly","volume":"34 3","pages":"265-287"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Promoting transfer of hybrid training: Interaction of task-contingent conscientiousness and supervisor support\",\"authors\":\"Brian D. Blume, Jason L. Huang, Zhonghao Wang, J. Kevin Ford\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hrdq.21473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Research on training has accumulated knowledge of factors influencing transfer of training. However, little is known about how these factors interact to impact training activity level and training transfer. Based on recent advances in the contingency approach to personality, we examine person–situation interaction by testing how task-contingent conscientiousness influences trainees to utilize supervisor support differently during training and transfer. We situate the current investigation in hybrid management training courses where a field sample of employees (<i>N</i> = 200) first attended required in-person workshops and then received voluntary online modules. Results show that task-contingent conscientiousness moderated both the linkage between supervisor support and training activity level and the linkage between training activity level and transfer of training. Specifically, for trainees with higher task-contingent conscientiousness, supervisor support tended to have a stronger association with training activity level, and training activity level tended to translate into more transfer of training. Our findings provide unique insights into when supervisor support may be more beneficial depending on trainees' individual differences. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of this research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47803,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human Resource Development Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"34 3\",\"pages\":\"265-287\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human Resource Development Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrdq.21473\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Resource Development Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrdq.21473","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
Promoting transfer of hybrid training: Interaction of task-contingent conscientiousness and supervisor support
Research on training has accumulated knowledge of factors influencing transfer of training. However, little is known about how these factors interact to impact training activity level and training transfer. Based on recent advances in the contingency approach to personality, we examine person–situation interaction by testing how task-contingent conscientiousness influences trainees to utilize supervisor support differently during training and transfer. We situate the current investigation in hybrid management training courses where a field sample of employees (N = 200) first attended required in-person workshops and then received voluntary online modules. Results show that task-contingent conscientiousness moderated both the linkage between supervisor support and training activity level and the linkage between training activity level and transfer of training. Specifically, for trainees with higher task-contingent conscientiousness, supervisor support tended to have a stronger association with training activity level, and training activity level tended to translate into more transfer of training. Our findings provide unique insights into when supervisor support may be more beneficial depending on trainees' individual differences. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of this research.
期刊介绍:
Human Resource Development Quarterly (HRDQ) is the first scholarly journal focused directly on the evolving field of human resource development (HRD). It provides a central focus for research on human resource development issues as well as the means for disseminating such research. HRDQ recognizes the interdisciplinary nature of the HRD field and brings together relevant research from the related fields, such as economics, education, management, sociology, and psychology. It provides an important link in the application of theory and research to HRD practice. HRDQ publishes scholarly work that addresses the theoretical foundations of HRD, HRD research, and evaluation of HRD interventions and contexts.