SLP对DHH儿童语言学习神话的看法。

IF 1.7 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Jena McDaniel, Hannah Krimm, C Melanie Schuele
{"title":"SLP对DHH儿童语言学习神话的看法。","authors":"Jena McDaniel, Hannah Krimm, C Melanie Schuele","doi":"10.1093/deafed/enad043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article reports on speech-language pathologists' (SLPs') knowledge related to myths about spoken language learning of children who are deaf and hard of hearing (DHH). The broader study was designed as a step toward narrowing the research-practice gap and providing effective, evidence-based language services to children. In the broader study, SLPs (n = 106) reported their agreement/disagreement with myth statements and true statements (n = 52) about 7 clinical topics related to speech and language development. For the current report, participant responses to 7 statements within the DHH topic were analyzed. Participants exhibited a relative strength in bilingualism knowledge for spoken languages and a relative weakness in audiovisual integration knowledge. Much individual variation was observed. Participants' responses were more likely to align with current evidence about bilingualism if the participants had less experience as an SLP. The findings provide guidance on prioritizing topics for speech-language pathology preservice and professional development.</p>","PeriodicalId":47768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education","volume":" ","pages":"245-257"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10950421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SLPs' perceptions of language learning myths about children who are DHH.\",\"authors\":\"Jena McDaniel, Hannah Krimm, C Melanie Schuele\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/deafed/enad043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This article reports on speech-language pathologists' (SLPs') knowledge related to myths about spoken language learning of children who are deaf and hard of hearing (DHH). The broader study was designed as a step toward narrowing the research-practice gap and providing effective, evidence-based language services to children. In the broader study, SLPs (n = 106) reported their agreement/disagreement with myth statements and true statements (n = 52) about 7 clinical topics related to speech and language development. For the current report, participant responses to 7 statements within the DHH topic were analyzed. Participants exhibited a relative strength in bilingualism knowledge for spoken languages and a relative weakness in audiovisual integration knowledge. Much individual variation was observed. Participants' responses were more likely to align with current evidence about bilingualism if the participants had less experience as an SLP. The findings provide guidance on prioritizing topics for speech-language pathology preservice and professional development.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47768,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"245-257\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10950421/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enad043\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enad043","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文报道了言语病理学家(SLP)对失聪和重听儿童(DHH)口语学习神话的了解。这项更广泛的研究旨在缩小研究实践差距,为儿童提供有效、循证的语言服务。在更广泛的研究中,SLP(n = 106)报告他们同意/不同意虚假陈述和真实陈述(n = 52)关于与言语和语言发展有关的7个临床主题。在本报告中,分析了参与者对DHH主题中7项陈述的回应。参与者在口语的双语知识方面表现出相对优势,而在视听整合知识方面则表现出相对劣势。观察到许多个体差异。如果参与者作为SLP的经验较少,那么参与者的回答更有可能与当前关于双语的证据一致。该研究结果为语音病理学研究和专业发展的优先主题提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
SLPs' perceptions of language learning myths about children who are DHH.

This article reports on speech-language pathologists' (SLPs') knowledge related to myths about spoken language learning of children who are deaf and hard of hearing (DHH). The broader study was designed as a step toward narrowing the research-practice gap and providing effective, evidence-based language services to children. In the broader study, SLPs (n = 106) reported their agreement/disagreement with myth statements and true statements (n = 52) about 7 clinical topics related to speech and language development. For the current report, participant responses to 7 statements within the DHH topic were analyzed. Participants exhibited a relative strength in bilingualism knowledge for spoken languages and a relative weakness in audiovisual integration knowledge. Much individual variation was observed. Participants' responses were more likely to align with current evidence about bilingualism if the participants had less experience as an SLP. The findings provide guidance on prioritizing topics for speech-language pathology preservice and professional development.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal integrating and coordinating basic and applied research relating to individuals who are deaf, including cultural, developmental, linguistic, and educational topics. JDSDE addresses issues of current and future concern to allied fields, encouraging interdisciplinary discussion. The journal promises a forum that is timely, of high quality, and accessible to researchers, educators, and lay audiences. Instructions for contributors appear at the back of each issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信