对专家和普通人而言,"人工智能 "这个流行词背后隐藏着什么?人工智能 "在 IT 专业人士和非专业人士心目中的表征。

IF 1.8 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Europes Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2022-05-31 eCollection Date: 2022-05-01 DOI:10.5964/ejop.5473
Paweł Fortuna, Oleg Gorbaniuk
{"title":"对专家和普通人而言,\"人工智能 \"这个流行词背后隐藏着什么?人工智能 \"在 IT 专业人士和非专业人士心目中的表征。","authors":"Paweł Fortuna, Oleg Gorbaniuk","doi":"10.5964/ejop.5473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the presented research was to define the differences between information technology (IT) professionals (ITP) and non-professionals (NP) in the way of understanding artificial intelligence (AI). The research was designed in the tradition of categorization research. In an online study participants were asked to make typicality and familiarity judgments for 50 AI exemplars. Two types of analyses were carried out, which made it possible to identify and compare the hierarchy of AI designates (graded structure) and the dimensions of their groupings. We have found that \"invisible AI\" exemplars were highly rated by ITP, but \"visible AI\" by NP. Expert knowledge allows ITP to systematize AI exemplars based on both structural and functional elements. On the other hand, laymen indicate the functions that AI-driven products perform, rather than their structures. For ITP, they are primarily algorithmic systems, while for NP they are systems that emulate the functions of living organisms.</p>","PeriodicalId":47113,"journal":{"name":"Europes Journal of Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632548/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Is Behind the Buzzword for Experts and Laymen: Representation of \\\"Artificial Intelligence\\\" in the IT-Professionals' and Non-Professionals' Minds.\",\"authors\":\"Paweł Fortuna, Oleg Gorbaniuk\",\"doi\":\"10.5964/ejop.5473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of the presented research was to define the differences between information technology (IT) professionals (ITP) and non-professionals (NP) in the way of understanding artificial intelligence (AI). The research was designed in the tradition of categorization research. In an online study participants were asked to make typicality and familiarity judgments for 50 AI exemplars. Two types of analyses were carried out, which made it possible to identify and compare the hierarchy of AI designates (graded structure) and the dimensions of their groupings. We have found that \\\"invisible AI\\\" exemplars were highly rated by ITP, but \\\"visible AI\\\" by NP. Expert knowledge allows ITP to systematize AI exemplars based on both structural and functional elements. On the other hand, laymen indicate the functions that AI-driven products perform, rather than their structures. For ITP, they are primarily algorithmic systems, while for NP they are systems that emulate the functions of living organisms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Europes Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9632548/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Europes Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.5473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/5/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europes Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.5473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定信息技术(IT)专业人员(ITP)和非专业人员(NP)在理解人工智能(AI)方面的差异。这项研究是按照分类研究的传统设计的。在一项在线研究中,参与者被要求对 50 个人工智能范例进行典型性和熟悉性判断。我们进行了两类分析,从而确定并比较了人工智能候选对象的等级(分级结构)及其分组的维度。我们发现,ITP 对 "隐形人工智能 "范例的评分很高,而 NP 则对 "可见人工智能 "范例的评分很高。专家知识使 ITP 能够根据结构和功能要素将人工智能范例系统化。另一方面,外行人指出的是人工智能驱动产品的功能,而不是其结构。对 ITP 来说,它们主要是算法系统,而对 NP 来说,它们是模拟生物体功能的系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Is Behind the Buzzword for Experts and Laymen: Representation of "Artificial Intelligence" in the IT-Professionals' and Non-Professionals' Minds.

The aim of the presented research was to define the differences between information technology (IT) professionals (ITP) and non-professionals (NP) in the way of understanding artificial intelligence (AI). The research was designed in the tradition of categorization research. In an online study participants were asked to make typicality and familiarity judgments for 50 AI exemplars. Two types of analyses were carried out, which made it possible to identify and compare the hierarchy of AI designates (graded structure) and the dimensions of their groupings. We have found that "invisible AI" exemplars were highly rated by ITP, but "visible AI" by NP. Expert knowledge allows ITP to systematize AI exemplars based on both structural and functional elements. On the other hand, laymen indicate the functions that AI-driven products perform, rather than their structures. For ITP, they are primarily algorithmic systems, while for NP they are systems that emulate the functions of living organisms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Europes Journal of Psychology
Europes Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
31 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信