探索沙特物理治疗师对其职业的看法和意见:一项混合方法研究。

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION
Rehabilitation Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-06-21 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/2890548
Saleh M Aloraini, Ghdy R Alrsheed
{"title":"探索沙特物理治疗师对其职业的看法和意见:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Saleh M Aloraini, Ghdy R Alrsheed","doi":"10.1155/2022/2890548","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Methods A cross-sectional, mixed-method study was employed. Practicing PTs and PT students were recruited to fill out a self-administered questionnaire to rank nine different professions (including PT) across different dimensions. Further, participants reported on their job satisfaction and participated in a semistructured interview regarding their responses. Results A total of 175 individuals participated in this study. The physical therapy profession was rated 6th on level of education, last (9th) on level of income and level of social standing, 5th on level of responsibility, and 3rd on level of usefulness. In the overall occupational prestige, the physical therapy profession was ranked the lowest compared to the other professions. Lastly, the data from the semistructured interviews corroborated the findings identified from the quantitative aspect of our study. Discussion. The overall results of the study indicate that the current perceived level of occupational prestige among Saudi PTs and PT students is somewhat disappointing. Participants generally viewed their profession in a low occupational prestige status, which is in contrast to previous studies conducted in other countries. While some of these results can be explained by the nature and history of the profession in Saudi Arabia, Academic institutions and policy makers should make an effort to promote the occupational prestige of the physical therapy profession.","PeriodicalId":45585,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"2890548"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239830/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring Saudi Physical Therapists' Perceptions and Opinions on Their Profession: A Mixed-Method Study.\",\"authors\":\"Saleh M Aloraini, Ghdy R Alrsheed\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/2890548\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Methods A cross-sectional, mixed-method study was employed. Practicing PTs and PT students were recruited to fill out a self-administered questionnaire to rank nine different professions (including PT) across different dimensions. Further, participants reported on their job satisfaction and participated in a semistructured interview regarding their responses. Results A total of 175 individuals participated in this study. The physical therapy profession was rated 6th on level of education, last (9th) on level of income and level of social standing, 5th on level of responsibility, and 3rd on level of usefulness. In the overall occupational prestige, the physical therapy profession was ranked the lowest compared to the other professions. Lastly, the data from the semistructured interviews corroborated the findings identified from the quantitative aspect of our study. Discussion. The overall results of the study indicate that the current perceived level of occupational prestige among Saudi PTs and PT students is somewhat disappointing. Participants generally viewed their profession in a low occupational prestige status, which is in contrast to previous studies conducted in other countries. While some of these results can be explained by the nature and history of the profession in Saudi Arabia, Academic institutions and policy makers should make an effort to promote the occupational prestige of the physical therapy profession.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2890548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9239830/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2890548\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2890548","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

方法:采用横断面混合方法进行研究。本研究招募执业PT和PT学生填写一份自填问卷,对九个不同职业(包括PT)在不同维度上进行排名。此外,参与者报告了他们的工作满意度,并参加了关于他们的回答的半结构化访谈。结果:共有175人参与了本研究。物理治疗专业在教育水平上排名第6位,在收入和社会地位上排名最后(第9位),在责任心上排名第5位,在实用性上排名第3位。在整体职业声望方面,物理治疗专业在其他专业中排名最低。最后,来自半结构化访谈的数据证实了我们研究定量方面的发现。讨论。研究的总体结果表明,目前感知水平的职业威望在沙特PT和PT学生有些令人失望。参与者普遍认为他们的专业在职业声望地位较低,这与以前在其他国家进行的研究形成对比。虽然其中一些结果可以用沙特阿拉伯职业的性质和历史来解释,但学术机构和政策制定者应该努力促进物理治疗职业的职业声望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Exploring Saudi Physical Therapists' Perceptions and Opinions on Their Profession: A Mixed-Method Study.

Exploring Saudi Physical Therapists' Perceptions and Opinions on Their Profession: A Mixed-Method Study.

Exploring Saudi Physical Therapists' Perceptions and Opinions on Their Profession: A Mixed-Method Study.

Exploring Saudi Physical Therapists' Perceptions and Opinions on Their Profession: A Mixed-Method Study.
Methods A cross-sectional, mixed-method study was employed. Practicing PTs and PT students were recruited to fill out a self-administered questionnaire to rank nine different professions (including PT) across different dimensions. Further, participants reported on their job satisfaction and participated in a semistructured interview regarding their responses. Results A total of 175 individuals participated in this study. The physical therapy profession was rated 6th on level of education, last (9th) on level of income and level of social standing, 5th on level of responsibility, and 3rd on level of usefulness. In the overall occupational prestige, the physical therapy profession was ranked the lowest compared to the other professions. Lastly, the data from the semistructured interviews corroborated the findings identified from the quantitative aspect of our study. Discussion. The overall results of the study indicate that the current perceived level of occupational prestige among Saudi PTs and PT students is somewhat disappointing. Participants generally viewed their profession in a low occupational prestige status, which is in contrast to previous studies conducted in other countries. While some of these results can be explained by the nature and history of the profession in Saudi Arabia, Academic institutions and policy makers should make an effort to promote the occupational prestige of the physical therapy profession.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of physical medicine and rehabilitation. The journal focuses on improving and restoring functional ability and quality of life to those with physical impairments or disabilities. In addition, articles looking at techniques to assess and study disabling conditions will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信