阿尔茨海默病的符号加工缺陷。

Max Toepper, Carolin Steuwe, Thomas Beblo, Eva Bauer, Sebastian Boedeker, Christine Thomas, Hans J Markowitsch, Martin Driessen, Gebhard Sammer
{"title":"阿尔茨海默病的符号加工缺陷。","authors":"Max Toepper,&nbsp;Carolin Steuwe,&nbsp;Thomas Beblo,&nbsp;Eva Bauer,&nbsp;Sebastian Boedeker,&nbsp;Christine Thomas,&nbsp;Hans J Markowitsch,&nbsp;Martin Driessen,&nbsp;Gebhard Sammer","doi":"10.1097/WAD.0000000000000035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Symbols and signs have been suggested to improve the orientation of patients suffering from Alzheimer disease (AD). However, there are hardly any studies that confirm whether AD patients benefit from signs or symbols and which symbol characteristics might improve or impede their symbol comprehension. To address these issues, 30 AD patients and 30 matched healthy controls performed a symbol processing task (SPT) with 4 different item categories. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was run to identify impact of different item categories on performance accuracy in both the experimental groups. Moreover, SPT scores were correlated with neuropsychological test scores in a broad range of other cognitive domains. Finally, diagnostic accuracy of the SPT was calculated by a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. Results revealed a global symbol processing dysfunction in AD that was associated with semantic memory and executive deficits. Moreover, AD patients showed a disproportional performance decline at SPT items with visual distraction. Finally, the SPT total score showed high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating between AD patients and healthy controls. The present findings suggest that specific symbol features impede symbol processing in AD and argue for a diagnostic benefit of the SPT in neuropsychological assessment. </p>","PeriodicalId":520551,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer disease and associated disorders","volume":" ","pages":"340-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000035","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deficient symbol processing in Alzheimer disease.\",\"authors\":\"Max Toepper,&nbsp;Carolin Steuwe,&nbsp;Thomas Beblo,&nbsp;Eva Bauer,&nbsp;Sebastian Boedeker,&nbsp;Christine Thomas,&nbsp;Hans J Markowitsch,&nbsp;Martin Driessen,&nbsp;Gebhard Sammer\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WAD.0000000000000035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Symbols and signs have been suggested to improve the orientation of patients suffering from Alzheimer disease (AD). However, there are hardly any studies that confirm whether AD patients benefit from signs or symbols and which symbol characteristics might improve or impede their symbol comprehension. To address these issues, 30 AD patients and 30 matched healthy controls performed a symbol processing task (SPT) with 4 different item categories. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was run to identify impact of different item categories on performance accuracy in both the experimental groups. Moreover, SPT scores were correlated with neuropsychological test scores in a broad range of other cognitive domains. Finally, diagnostic accuracy of the SPT was calculated by a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. Results revealed a global symbol processing dysfunction in AD that was associated with semantic memory and executive deficits. Moreover, AD patients showed a disproportional performance decline at SPT items with visual distraction. Finally, the SPT total score showed high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating between AD patients and healthy controls. The present findings suggest that specific symbol features impede symbol processing in AD and argue for a diagnostic benefit of the SPT in neuropsychological assessment. </p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer disease and associated disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"340-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000035\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer disease and associated disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer disease and associated disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

符号和标志已被建议用于改善阿尔茨海默病(AD)患者的定向。然而,几乎没有研究证实AD患者是否受益于符号或符号特征,以及哪些符号特征可能改善或阻碍他们的符号理解。为了解决这些问题,30名AD患者和30名匹配的健康对照者进行了包含4个不同项目类别的符号处理任务(SPT)。重复测量的方差分析运行,以确定不同的项目类别对表现准确性的影响,在两个实验组。此外,SPT分数与其他认知领域的神经心理测试分数相关。最后,通过受者工作特征曲线分析计算SPT的诊断准确性。结果显示,AD患者的整体符号处理功能障碍与语义记忆和执行缺陷有关。此外,AD患者在SPT项目上表现出不成比例的表现下降,并伴有视觉分心。最后,SPT总分在区分AD患者和健康对照方面显示出较高的敏感性和特异性。目前的研究结果表明,特定的符号特征阻碍了AD中的符号处理,并论证了SPT在神经心理学评估中的诊断优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deficient symbol processing in Alzheimer disease.

Symbols and signs have been suggested to improve the orientation of patients suffering from Alzheimer disease (AD). However, there are hardly any studies that confirm whether AD patients benefit from signs or symbols and which symbol characteristics might improve or impede their symbol comprehension. To address these issues, 30 AD patients and 30 matched healthy controls performed a symbol processing task (SPT) with 4 different item categories. A repeated-measures analysis of variance was run to identify impact of different item categories on performance accuracy in both the experimental groups. Moreover, SPT scores were correlated with neuropsychological test scores in a broad range of other cognitive domains. Finally, diagnostic accuracy of the SPT was calculated by a receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. Results revealed a global symbol processing dysfunction in AD that was associated with semantic memory and executive deficits. Moreover, AD patients showed a disproportional performance decline at SPT items with visual distraction. Finally, the SPT total score showed high sensitivity and specificity in differentiating between AD patients and healthy controls. The present findings suggest that specific symbol features impede symbol processing in AD and argue for a diagnostic benefit of the SPT in neuropsychological assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信