手动轮椅类型对活动能力、心肺反应和感知用力的影响。

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION
Rehabilitation Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-06-11 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2022/5554571
Guilherme da Silva Bertolaccini, Frode Eika Sandnes, Fausto Orsi Medola, Terje Gjøvaag
{"title":"手动轮椅类型对活动能力、心肺反应和感知用力的影响。","authors":"Guilherme da Silva Bertolaccini,&nbsp;Frode Eika Sandnes,&nbsp;Fausto Orsi Medola,&nbsp;Terje Gjøvaag","doi":"10.1155/2022/5554571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study is aimed at comparing the design and configuration of the most commonly used manual wheelchair models through cardiorespiratory responses, perceived exertion, and mobility performance using two different manual wheelchairs, during mobility tasks. A within-group 2 × 3 × 2 controlled experiment was designed with three independent and four dependent variables. The independent variables included wheelchairs, with the levels active wheelchair with a rigid frame and passive wheelchair with foldable frame; conditions with the levels straight line, slalom, and agility; and speed with levels comfortable and fast. Dependent variables included oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>), distance travelled, speed, and perceived exertion. Results show that the active wheelchair yielded more beneficial characteristics although only the effect of wheelchair type on VO<sub>2</sub> efficiency (oxygen uptake per meter travelled) was statistically significant with a large effect size (<i>F</i>(1, 14) = 118.298, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.541). The better VO<sub>2</sub> efficiency was achieved with the active wheelchair under all tested conditions. The effect of wheelchair type on Borg scores was also statistically significant, although with a small effect size (<i>F</i>(1, 14) = 10.340, <i>p</i> = 0.006, <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.119); thus, active wheelchair use had lower Borg scores under all trials and was considered less exhausting than the passive wheelchair. In summary, use of the active wheelchair resulted in the users expending less energy per meter travelled and at the same time experiencing less fatigue. This may benefit overall wheelchair mobility and possibly reduce health complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":45585,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","volume":" ","pages":"5554571"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206577/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Manual Wheelchair Type on Mobility Performance, Cardiorespiratory Responses, and Perceived Exertion.\",\"authors\":\"Guilherme da Silva Bertolaccini,&nbsp;Frode Eika Sandnes,&nbsp;Fausto Orsi Medola,&nbsp;Terje Gjøvaag\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/5554571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study is aimed at comparing the design and configuration of the most commonly used manual wheelchair models through cardiorespiratory responses, perceived exertion, and mobility performance using two different manual wheelchairs, during mobility tasks. A within-group 2 × 3 × 2 controlled experiment was designed with three independent and four dependent variables. The independent variables included wheelchairs, with the levels active wheelchair with a rigid frame and passive wheelchair with foldable frame; conditions with the levels straight line, slalom, and agility; and speed with levels comfortable and fast. Dependent variables included oxygen uptake (VO<sub>2</sub>), distance travelled, speed, and perceived exertion. Results show that the active wheelchair yielded more beneficial characteristics although only the effect of wheelchair type on VO<sub>2</sub> efficiency (oxygen uptake per meter travelled) was statistically significant with a large effect size (<i>F</i>(1, 14) = 118.298, <i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.541). The better VO<sub>2</sub> efficiency was achieved with the active wheelchair under all tested conditions. The effect of wheelchair type on Borg scores was also statistically significant, although with a small effect size (<i>F</i>(1, 14) = 10.340, <i>p</i> = 0.006, <i>η</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.119); thus, active wheelchair use had lower Borg scores under all trials and was considered less exhausting than the passive wheelchair. In summary, use of the active wheelchair resulted in the users expending less energy per meter travelled and at the same time experiencing less fatigue. This may benefit overall wheelchair mobility and possibly reduce health complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"5554571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9206577/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5554571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5554571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究旨在比较最常用的手动轮椅模型的设计和配置,通过使用两种不同的手动轮椅在移动任务期间的心肺反应、感知劳累和移动性能。设计组内2 × 3 × 2对照试验,设3个自变量和4个因变量。自变量包括轮椅,分为刚性框架的主动轮椅和可折叠框架的被动轮椅;条件与水平直线,障碍,和敏捷;速度与水平舒适和快速。因变量包括摄氧量(VO2)、行进距离、速度和感知运动。结果表明,虽然只有轮椅类型对VO2效率(每米行程的摄氧量)的影响具有统计学意义,但主动轮椅产生了更多有益的特征(F(1,14) = 118.298, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.541)。在所有测试条件下,主动轮椅都取得了更好的VO2效率。轮椅类型对Borg评分的影响也具有统计学意义,但效应量较小(F(1,14) = 10.340, p = 0.006, η 2 = 0.119);因此,在所有试验中,主动轮椅使用的博格分数较低,并且被认为比被动轮椅更少疲劳。总之,使用主动轮椅导致使用者每走一米消耗更少的能量,同时也减少了疲劳。这可能有利于轮椅的整体灵活性,并可能减少健康并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of Manual Wheelchair Type on Mobility Performance, Cardiorespiratory Responses, and Perceived Exertion.

Effect of Manual Wheelchair Type on Mobility Performance, Cardiorespiratory Responses, and Perceived Exertion.

Effect of Manual Wheelchair Type on Mobility Performance, Cardiorespiratory Responses, and Perceived Exertion.

Effect of Manual Wheelchair Type on Mobility Performance, Cardiorespiratory Responses, and Perceived Exertion.

This study is aimed at comparing the design and configuration of the most commonly used manual wheelchair models through cardiorespiratory responses, perceived exertion, and mobility performance using two different manual wheelchairs, during mobility tasks. A within-group 2 × 3 × 2 controlled experiment was designed with three independent and four dependent variables. The independent variables included wheelchairs, with the levels active wheelchair with a rigid frame and passive wheelchair with foldable frame; conditions with the levels straight line, slalom, and agility; and speed with levels comfortable and fast. Dependent variables included oxygen uptake (VO2), distance travelled, speed, and perceived exertion. Results show that the active wheelchair yielded more beneficial characteristics although only the effect of wheelchair type on VO2 efficiency (oxygen uptake per meter travelled) was statistically significant with a large effect size (F(1, 14) = 118.298, p < 0.001, η 2 = 0.541). The better VO2 efficiency was achieved with the active wheelchair under all tested conditions. The effect of wheelchair type on Borg scores was also statistically significant, although with a small effect size (F(1, 14) = 10.340, p = 0.006, η 2 = 0.119); thus, active wheelchair use had lower Borg scores under all trials and was considered less exhausting than the passive wheelchair. In summary, use of the active wheelchair resulted in the users expending less energy per meter travelled and at the same time experiencing less fatigue. This may benefit overall wheelchair mobility and possibly reduce health complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of physical medicine and rehabilitation. The journal focuses on improving and restoring functional ability and quality of life to those with physical impairments or disabilities. In addition, articles looking at techniques to assess and study disabling conditions will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信