蛋白质结构的表观遗传维度。

Q2 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Fodil Azzaz, Jacques Fantini
{"title":"蛋白质结构的表观遗传维度。","authors":"Fodil Azzaz,&nbsp;Jacques Fantini","doi":"10.1515/bmc-2022-0006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate prediction of protein structure is one of the most challenging goals of biology. The most recent achievement is AlphaFold, a machine learning method that has claimed to have solved the structure of almost all human proteins. This technological breakthrough has been compared to the sequencing of the human genome. However, this triumphal statement should be treated with caution, as we identified serious flaws in some AlphaFold models. Disordered regions are often represented by large loops that clash with the overall protein geometry, leading to unrealistic structures, especially for membrane proteins. In fact, AlphaFold comes up against the notion that protein folding is not solely determined by genomic information. We suggest that all parameters controlling the structure of a protein without being strictly encoded in its amino acid sequence should be coined \"epigenetic dimension of protein structure.\" Such parameters include for instance protein solvation by membrane lipids, or the structuration of disordered proteins upon ligand binding, but exclude sequence-encoded sites of post-translational modifications such as glycosylation. In our view, this paradigm is necessary to reconcile two opposite properties of living systems: beyond rigorous biological coding, evolution has given way to a certain level of uncertainty and anarchy.</p>","PeriodicalId":38392,"journal":{"name":"Biomolecular Concepts","volume":" ","pages":"55-60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The epigenetic dimension of protein structure.\",\"authors\":\"Fodil Azzaz,&nbsp;Jacques Fantini\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/bmc-2022-0006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accurate prediction of protein structure is one of the most challenging goals of biology. The most recent achievement is AlphaFold, a machine learning method that has claimed to have solved the structure of almost all human proteins. This technological breakthrough has been compared to the sequencing of the human genome. However, this triumphal statement should be treated with caution, as we identified serious flaws in some AlphaFold models. Disordered regions are often represented by large loops that clash with the overall protein geometry, leading to unrealistic structures, especially for membrane proteins. In fact, AlphaFold comes up against the notion that protein folding is not solely determined by genomic information. We suggest that all parameters controlling the structure of a protein without being strictly encoded in its amino acid sequence should be coined \\\"epigenetic dimension of protein structure.\\\" Such parameters include for instance protein solvation by membrane lipids, or the structuration of disordered proteins upon ligand binding, but exclude sequence-encoded sites of post-translational modifications such as glycosylation. In our view, this paradigm is necessary to reconcile two opposite properties of living systems: beyond rigorous biological coding, evolution has given way to a certain level of uncertainty and anarchy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomolecular Concepts\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"55-60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomolecular Concepts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/bmc-2022-0006\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomolecular Concepts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/bmc-2022-0006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

准确预测蛋白质结构是生物学中最具挑战性的目标之一。最近的成就是AlphaFold,这是一种机器学习方法,声称已经解决了几乎所有人类蛋白质的结构。这一技术突破被比作人类基因组测序。然而,这个胜利的声明应该谨慎对待,因为我们发现了一些AlphaFold模型的严重缺陷。无序区域通常由与整体蛋白质几何形状冲突的大环表示,导致不现实的结构,特别是对于膜蛋白。事实上,AlphaFold反对蛋白质折叠并不完全由基因组信息决定的观点。我们建议所有控制蛋白质结构的参数,而不是严格编码在其氨基酸序列中,应该创造“蛋白质结构的表观遗传维度”。这些参数包括例如膜脂的蛋白质溶剂化,或配体结合时无序蛋白质的结构,但不包括序列编码的翻译后修饰位点,如糖基化。在我们看来,这种范式对于调和生命系统的两个相反属性是必要的:除了严格的生物编码,进化已经让位于某种程度的不确定性和无政府状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The epigenetic dimension of protein structure.

Accurate prediction of protein structure is one of the most challenging goals of biology. The most recent achievement is AlphaFold, a machine learning method that has claimed to have solved the structure of almost all human proteins. This technological breakthrough has been compared to the sequencing of the human genome. However, this triumphal statement should be treated with caution, as we identified serious flaws in some AlphaFold models. Disordered regions are often represented by large loops that clash with the overall protein geometry, leading to unrealistic structures, especially for membrane proteins. In fact, AlphaFold comes up against the notion that protein folding is not solely determined by genomic information. We suggest that all parameters controlling the structure of a protein without being strictly encoded in its amino acid sequence should be coined "epigenetic dimension of protein structure." Such parameters include for instance protein solvation by membrane lipids, or the structuration of disordered proteins upon ligand binding, but exclude sequence-encoded sites of post-translational modifications such as glycosylation. In our view, this paradigm is necessary to reconcile two opposite properties of living systems: beyond rigorous biological coding, evolution has given way to a certain level of uncertainty and anarchy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biomolecular Concepts
Biomolecular Concepts Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (all)
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BioMolecular Concepts is a peer-reviewed open access journal fostering the integration of different fields of biomolecular research. The journal aims to provide expert summaries from prominent researchers, and conclusive extensions of research data leading to new and original, testable hypotheses. Aspects of research that can promote related fields, and lead to novel insight into biological mechanisms or potential medical applications are of special interest. Original research articles reporting new data of broad significance are also welcome. Topics: -cellular and molecular biology- genetics and epigenetics- biochemistry- structural biology- neurosciences- developmental biology- molecular medicine- pharmacology- microbiology- plant biology and biotechnology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信