{"title":"在工作中装模作样,在家里努力保持健康:表面表演的模型及其与不健康饮食和体育活动的关系。","authors":"Lucille Headrick, YoungAh Park","doi":"10.1037/ocp0000317","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Performing emotional labor impairs mood as well as regulatory control of employees, and we compare these mechanisms to explain critical health-related behaviors: eating and exercise. Two studies examine the relationship of surface acting at work with unhealthy eating and physical activity at home as mediated by negative and positive affect. Emotion regulation (ER) self-efficacy is tested as a moderator of the indirect relationships. Also, the relative strength of the affect mechanisms and a depletion mechanism are explored. Study 1 utilized a time-lagged between-person design to explore these relationships among 287 customer service workers. Results show that surface acting has an indirect link with unhealthy eating via negative affect and an indirect link with physical activity via positive affect. ER self-efficacy moderates the path from negative affect to unhealthy eating, thereby weakening the indirect effect of surface acting on unhealthy eating via negative affect. Study 2 utilized a 5-week diary study of 469 teachers to replicate Study 1 at the within-person level. Results show that surface acting has indirect effects on unhealthy eating and physical activity via negative affect at the week level. Also, surface acting has an indirect effect on physical activity via positive affect at the week level. Again, ER self-efficacy cross-moderates (weakens) the indirect link between surface acting and unhealthy eating via negative affect. The pairwise comparisons of the indirect effects reveal no differences among the affect mediators (Studies 1 and 2); however, positive affect may account for more of the effect of surface acting on physical activity than depletion (Study 2). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48339,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Faking at work, struggling to be healthy at home: A model of surface acting and its relation with unhealthy eating and physical activity.\",\"authors\":\"Lucille Headrick, YoungAh Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/ocp0000317\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Performing emotional labor impairs mood as well as regulatory control of employees, and we compare these mechanisms to explain critical health-related behaviors: eating and exercise. Two studies examine the relationship of surface acting at work with unhealthy eating and physical activity at home as mediated by negative and positive affect. Emotion regulation (ER) self-efficacy is tested as a moderator of the indirect relationships. Also, the relative strength of the affect mechanisms and a depletion mechanism are explored. Study 1 utilized a time-lagged between-person design to explore these relationships among 287 customer service workers. Results show that surface acting has an indirect link with unhealthy eating via negative affect and an indirect link with physical activity via positive affect. ER self-efficacy moderates the path from negative affect to unhealthy eating, thereby weakening the indirect effect of surface acting on unhealthy eating via negative affect. Study 2 utilized a 5-week diary study of 469 teachers to replicate Study 1 at the within-person level. Results show that surface acting has indirect effects on unhealthy eating and physical activity via negative affect at the week level. Also, surface acting has an indirect effect on physical activity via positive affect at the week level. Again, ER self-efficacy cross-moderates (weakens) the indirect link between surface acting and unhealthy eating via negative affect. The pairwise comparisons of the indirect effects reveal no differences among the affect mediators (Studies 1 and 2); however, positive affect may account for more of the effect of surface acting on physical activity than depletion (Study 2). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48339,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000317\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/12/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000317","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
进行情绪劳动会损害员工的情绪和调节控制,我们比较了这些机制来解释关键的健康相关行为:饮食和运动。两项研究考察了消极和积极影响介导的工作表面行为与不健康饮食和家庭体育活动的关系。情绪调节(ER)自我效能感在间接关系中起调节作用。并探讨了影响的相对强度机制和耗竭机制。研究1利用时间滞后人与人之间的设计来探索287名客户服务人员之间的这些关系。结果表明,表面表演通过消极影响与不健康饮食有间接联系,通过积极影响与体育活动有间接联系。内啡肽自我效能调节负性情绪到不健康饮食的路径,从而减弱表面通过负性情绪作用于不健康饮食的间接作用。研究2利用469名教师为期5周的日记研究,在个人层面上复制研究1。结果表明,表面表演通过周水平的负面影响间接影响不健康饮食和身体活动。此外,表面表演对身体活动有间接的影响,通过积极的影响在一周的水平。再一次,内质网自我效能通过负面影响交叉调节(削弱)表面行为与不健康饮食之间的间接联系。间接效应的两两比较显示影响介质之间没有差异(研究1和2);然而,积极的影响可能比消耗表面作用对身体活动的影响更大(研究2)。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA,版权所有)。
Faking at work, struggling to be healthy at home: A model of surface acting and its relation with unhealthy eating and physical activity.
Performing emotional labor impairs mood as well as regulatory control of employees, and we compare these mechanisms to explain critical health-related behaviors: eating and exercise. Two studies examine the relationship of surface acting at work with unhealthy eating and physical activity at home as mediated by negative and positive affect. Emotion regulation (ER) self-efficacy is tested as a moderator of the indirect relationships. Also, the relative strength of the affect mechanisms and a depletion mechanism are explored. Study 1 utilized a time-lagged between-person design to explore these relationships among 287 customer service workers. Results show that surface acting has an indirect link with unhealthy eating via negative affect and an indirect link with physical activity via positive affect. ER self-efficacy moderates the path from negative affect to unhealthy eating, thereby weakening the indirect effect of surface acting on unhealthy eating via negative affect. Study 2 utilized a 5-week diary study of 469 teachers to replicate Study 1 at the within-person level. Results show that surface acting has indirect effects on unhealthy eating and physical activity via negative affect at the week level. Also, surface acting has an indirect effect on physical activity via positive affect at the week level. Again, ER self-efficacy cross-moderates (weakens) the indirect link between surface acting and unhealthy eating via negative affect. The pairwise comparisons of the indirect effects reveal no differences among the affect mediators (Studies 1 and 2); however, positive affect may account for more of the effect of surface acting on physical activity than depletion (Study 2). (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Journal of Occupational Health Psychology offers research, theory, and public policy articles in occupational health psychology, an interdisciplinary field representing a broad range of backgrounds, interests, and specializations. Occupational health psychology concerns the application of psychology to improving the quality of work life and to protecting and promoting the safety, health, and well-being of workers. This journal focuses on the work environment, the individual, and the work-family interface.