在基于努力的决策任务中增加动机:显著性和奖励预期操纵的影响。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Cognitive Neuropsychiatry Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2021-11-23 DOI:10.1080/13546805.2021.2007068
Katharina E Renz, Matthias Pillny, Tania M Lincoln
{"title":"在基于努力的决策任务中增加动机:显著性和奖励预期操纵的影响。","authors":"Katharina E Renz,&nbsp;Matthias Pillny,&nbsp;Tania M Lincoln","doi":"10.1080/13546805.2021.2007068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A significant proportion of patients with affective and psychotic disorders show a marked reduction in goal-directed behaviour, which is also reflected in the behavioural outcomes of effort-based decision-making paradigms. The factors underlying this reduction are not yet fully understood. Reward salience and reward expectancy have been discussed as factors that potentially influence approach behaviour. The aim of this study was thus to test their effects on behaviour in an effort-based decision-making paradigm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In two studies with community samples we applied a modified version of the Balloon Task. In study 1, we manipulated reward salience in a within-subject design (<i>N</i> = 32) by highlighting the monetary rewards. In study 2, we manipulated reward expectancy in a between-subject design (<i>N</i> = 72) by adding five practice trials with either positive or negative feedback prior to the task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The salience of rewards manipulation significantly increased effort expenditure and the allocation of effort to the level of rewards whereas the reward expectancy manipulation did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The finding that increasing the salience of rewards increases motivated behaviour in an effort-based decision-making paradigm offers promising possibilities for intervention in disorders characterised by motivational deficits, such asaffective and psychotic disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":51277,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","volume":"27 1","pages":"20-34"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Increasing motivation in effort-based decision-making tasks: effects of salience and reward expectancy manipulations.\",\"authors\":\"Katharina E Renz,&nbsp;Matthias Pillny,&nbsp;Tania M Lincoln\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13546805.2021.2007068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A significant proportion of patients with affective and psychotic disorders show a marked reduction in goal-directed behaviour, which is also reflected in the behavioural outcomes of effort-based decision-making paradigms. The factors underlying this reduction are not yet fully understood. Reward salience and reward expectancy have been discussed as factors that potentially influence approach behaviour. The aim of this study was thus to test their effects on behaviour in an effort-based decision-making paradigm.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In two studies with community samples we applied a modified version of the Balloon Task. In study 1, we manipulated reward salience in a within-subject design (<i>N</i> = 32) by highlighting the monetary rewards. In study 2, we manipulated reward expectancy in a between-subject design (<i>N</i> = 72) by adding five practice trials with either positive or negative feedback prior to the task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The salience of rewards manipulation significantly increased effort expenditure and the allocation of effort to the level of rewards whereas the reward expectancy manipulation did not.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The finding that increasing the salience of rewards increases motivated behaviour in an effort-based decision-making paradigm offers promising possibilities for intervention in disorders characterised by motivational deficits, such asaffective and psychotic disorders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"20-34\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2021.2007068\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/11/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuropsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13546805.2021.2007068","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/11/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

背景:相当大比例的情感和精神障碍患者表现出目标导向行为的显著减少,这也反映在基于努力的决策范式的行为结果中。造成这种减少的因素尚未完全了解。奖励显著性和奖励预期已经作为潜在影响接近行为的因素进行了讨论。因此,本研究的目的是在基于努力的决策范式中测试它们对行为的影响。方法:在两项社区样本研究中,我们应用了气球任务的修改版本。在研究1中,我们通过突出货币奖励来操纵主题内设计(N = 32)中的奖励显著性。在研究2中,我们在受试者间设计(N = 72)中通过在任务前添加5个具有正反馈或负反馈的练习试验来操纵奖励期望。结果:奖励操纵显著增加了努力支出和努力在奖励水平上的分配,而奖励期望操纵则没有显著增加。结论:在以努力为基础的决策范式中,增加奖励的显著性会增加动机行为,这一发现为干预以动机缺陷为特征的障碍(如情感障碍和精神障碍)提供了有希望的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Increasing motivation in effort-based decision-making tasks: effects of salience and reward expectancy manipulations.

Background: A significant proportion of patients with affective and psychotic disorders show a marked reduction in goal-directed behaviour, which is also reflected in the behavioural outcomes of effort-based decision-making paradigms. The factors underlying this reduction are not yet fully understood. Reward salience and reward expectancy have been discussed as factors that potentially influence approach behaviour. The aim of this study was thus to test their effects on behaviour in an effort-based decision-making paradigm.

Methods: In two studies with community samples we applied a modified version of the Balloon Task. In study 1, we manipulated reward salience in a within-subject design (N = 32) by highlighting the monetary rewards. In study 2, we manipulated reward expectancy in a between-subject design (N = 72) by adding five practice trials with either positive or negative feedback prior to the task.

Results: The salience of rewards manipulation significantly increased effort expenditure and the allocation of effort to the level of rewards whereas the reward expectancy manipulation did not.

Conclusions: The finding that increasing the salience of rewards increases motivated behaviour in an effort-based decision-making paradigm offers promising possibilities for intervention in disorders characterised by motivational deficits, such asaffective and psychotic disorders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuropsychiatry (CNP) publishes high quality empirical and theoretical papers in the multi-disciplinary field of cognitive neuropsychiatry. Specifically the journal promotes the study of cognitive processes underlying psychological and behavioural abnormalities, including psychotic symptoms, with and without organic brain disease. Since 1996, CNP has published original papers, short reports, case studies and theoretical and empirical reviews in fields of clinical and cognitive neuropsychiatry, which have a bearing on the understanding of normal cognitive processes. Relevant research from cognitive neuroscience, cognitive neuropsychology and clinical populations will also be considered. There are no page charges and we are able to offer free color printing where color is necessary.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信