成人获得性脑损伤的视力评估工具:范围综述。

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Camille Dubé, Yu Jin, Brienne G Powers, Ginny Li, Amélie Labelle, Meghan S Rivers, Ivy M Gumboc, André E Bussières
{"title":"成人获得性脑损伤的视力评估工具:范围综述。","authors":"Camille Dubé, Yu Jin, Brienne G Powers, Ginny Li, Amélie Labelle, Meghan S Rivers, Ivy M Gumboc, André E Bussières","doi":"10.1177/00084174211042955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Unrecognized visual deficits (VDs) following an acquired brain injury (ABI) may impact clients' rehabilitation. Little is known about evaluation tools used in vision rehabilitation. <b>Purpose.</b> To systematically explore the literature describing evaluation tools used for VD on adults with ABI. <b>Method.</b> Using a scoping review methodology, we searched in MEDLINE(Ovid), Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the grey literature from inception to 2020. Quantitative and thematic analyses were performed. <b>Findings.</b> Of the 83 studies reporting on 86 evaluation tools, 47% used multiple tools to assess VD. Tools were mostly used by occupational therapists and psychologists to evaluate intermediate, intermediate to high, and high-level visual skills. Clinicians tend to select specific tools that focus on different levels of the hierarchy of visual skills. <b>Implications.</b> Future research should investigate the optimal timeframe for assessment of VD and the psychometric properties of tools to ensure comprehensive VD evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":49097,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie","volume":"88 4","pages":"340-351"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vision Evaluation Tools for Adults With Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Camille Dubé, Yu Jin, Brienne G Powers, Ginny Li, Amélie Labelle, Meghan S Rivers, Ivy M Gumboc, André E Bussières\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00084174211042955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background.</b> Unrecognized visual deficits (VDs) following an acquired brain injury (ABI) may impact clients' rehabilitation. Little is known about evaluation tools used in vision rehabilitation. <b>Purpose.</b> To systematically explore the literature describing evaluation tools used for VD on adults with ABI. <b>Method.</b> Using a scoping review methodology, we searched in MEDLINE(Ovid), Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the grey literature from inception to 2020. Quantitative and thematic analyses were performed. <b>Findings.</b> Of the 83 studies reporting on 86 evaluation tools, 47% used multiple tools to assess VD. Tools were mostly used by occupational therapists and psychologists to evaluate intermediate, intermediate to high, and high-level visual skills. Clinicians tend to select specific tools that focus on different levels of the hierarchy of visual skills. <b>Implications.</b> Future research should investigate the optimal timeframe for assessment of VD and the psychometric properties of tools to ensure comprehensive VD evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49097,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie\",\"volume\":\"88 4\",\"pages\":\"340-351\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8640270/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174211042955\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/10/18 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy-Revue Canadienne D Ergotherapie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00084174211042955","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/10/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。获得性脑损伤(ABI)后未被识别的视觉缺陷(VDs)可能会影响患者的康复。人们对视力康复中使用的评估工具知之甚少。目的。目的:系统地探索描述ABI成人VD评估工具的文献。方法。使用范围审查方法,我们检索了MEDLINE(Ovid)、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO和从成立到2020年的灰色文献。进行了定量和专题分析。发现。83项研究报告了86种评估工具,其中47%使用多种工具来评估VD。工具主要被职业治疗师和心理学家用来评估中级、中级到高级和高级视觉技能。临床医生倾向于选择特定的工具,专注于不同层次的视觉技能。的影响。未来的研究应探讨评估VD的最佳时间框架和工具的心理测量特性,以确保VD的全面评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Vision Evaluation Tools for Adults With Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.

Vision Evaluation Tools for Adults With Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.

Vision Evaluation Tools for Adults With Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.

Vision Evaluation Tools for Adults With Acquired Brain Injury: A Scoping Review.

Background. Unrecognized visual deficits (VDs) following an acquired brain injury (ABI) may impact clients' rehabilitation. Little is known about evaluation tools used in vision rehabilitation. Purpose. To systematically explore the literature describing evaluation tools used for VD on adults with ABI. Method. Using a scoping review methodology, we searched in MEDLINE(Ovid), Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and the grey literature from inception to 2020. Quantitative and thematic analyses were performed. Findings. Of the 83 studies reporting on 86 evaluation tools, 47% used multiple tools to assess VD. Tools were mostly used by occupational therapists and psychologists to evaluate intermediate, intermediate to high, and high-level visual skills. Clinicians tend to select specific tools that focus on different levels of the hierarchy of visual skills. Implications. Future research should investigate the optimal timeframe for assessment of VD and the psychometric properties of tools to ensure comprehensive VD evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy was first published in September 1933. Since that time, it has fostered advancement and growth in occupational therapy scholarship. The mission of the journal is to provide a forum for leading-edge occupational therapy scholarship that advances theory, practice, research, and policy. The vision is to be a high-quality scholarly journal that is at the forefront of the science of occupational therapy and a destination journal for the top scholars in the field, globally.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信