血乳酸AUC是评价运动训练对慢性心力衰竭患者功能工作能力影响的灵敏指标。

IF 1.5 Q3 REHABILITATION
Rehabilitation Research and Practice Pub Date : 2021-09-30 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2021/6619747
Torstein Valborgland, Kjetil Isaksen, Peter Scott Munk, Alf Inge Larsen
{"title":"血乳酸AUC是评价运动训练对慢性心力衰竭患者功能工作能力影响的灵敏指标。","authors":"Torstein Valborgland,&nbsp;Kjetil Isaksen,&nbsp;Peter Scott Munk,&nbsp;Alf Inge Larsen","doi":"10.1155/2021/6619747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Exercise training is an essential treatment option for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). However, it remains controversial, which surrogate measures of functional work capacity are most reliable. The purpose of this paper was to compare functional capacity work measured as capillary lactate concentrations area under the curve (AUC) with standard cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) with VO<sub>2peak</sub> and the 6-minute walk test (6 MWT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II/III with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% were randomised to home-based recommendation of regular exercise (RRE) (controls), moderate continuous training (MCT) or aerobic interval training (AIT). The MCT and AIT groups underwent 12 weeks of supervised exercise training. Exercise testing was performed as standard CPET treadmill test with analysis of VO<sub>2peak</sub>, the 6 MWT and a novel 30-minute submaximal treadmill test with capillary lactate AUC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients had statistically significant improvements in VO<sub>2peak</sub>, 6 MWT and lactate AUC after 12 weeks of exercise training: 6 MWT (p =0.035), VO<sub>2peak</sub> (p =0.049) and lactate AUC (p =0.002). Lactate AUC (p =0.046) and 6MWT (p =0.035), but not VO<sub>2peak</sub> revealed difference between the exercise modalities regarding functional work capacity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>6-MWT and lactate AUC, but not VO<sub>2peak</sub>, were able to reveal a statistically significant improvement in functional capacity between different exercise modalities.</p>","PeriodicalId":45585,"journal":{"name":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","volume":"2021 ","pages":"6619747"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blood Lactate AUC Is a Sensitive Test for Evaluating the Effect of Exercise Training on Functional Work Capacity in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.\",\"authors\":\"Torstein Valborgland,&nbsp;Kjetil Isaksen,&nbsp;Peter Scott Munk,&nbsp;Alf Inge Larsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2021/6619747\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Exercise training is an essential treatment option for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). However, it remains controversial, which surrogate measures of functional work capacity are most reliable. The purpose of this paper was to compare functional capacity work measured as capillary lactate concentrations area under the curve (AUC) with standard cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) with VO<sub>2peak</sub> and the 6-minute walk test (6 MWT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-three patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II/III with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% were randomised to home-based recommendation of regular exercise (RRE) (controls), moderate continuous training (MCT) or aerobic interval training (AIT). The MCT and AIT groups underwent 12 weeks of supervised exercise training. Exercise testing was performed as standard CPET treadmill test with analysis of VO<sub>2peak</sub>, the 6 MWT and a novel 30-minute submaximal treadmill test with capillary lactate AUC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients had statistically significant improvements in VO<sub>2peak</sub>, 6 MWT and lactate AUC after 12 weeks of exercise training: 6 MWT (p =0.035), VO<sub>2peak</sub> (p =0.049) and lactate AUC (p =0.002). Lactate AUC (p =0.046) and 6MWT (p =0.035), but not VO<sub>2peak</sub> revealed difference between the exercise modalities regarding functional work capacity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>6-MWT and lactate AUC, but not VO<sub>2peak</sub>, were able to reveal a statistically significant improvement in functional capacity between different exercise modalities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45585,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rehabilitation Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"2021 \",\"pages\":\"6619747\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8497121/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rehabilitation Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6619747\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rehabilitation Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6619747","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:运动训练是慢性心力衰竭(CHF)患者的基本治疗选择。然而,目前仍有争议的是,哪些替代测量功能工作能力是最可靠的。本文的目的是比较以毛细管乳酸浓度曲线下面积(AUC)测量的功能能力功与标准心肺运动试验(CPET)的VO2peak和6分钟步行试验(6mwt)。方法:23例纽约心脏协会(NYHA) II/III级患者,左室射血分数(LVEF) 2peak, MWT 6mwt和新型30分钟亚极限跑步机试验毛细管乳酸AUC。结果:经过12周的运动训练,所有患者的VO2peak、6mwt和乳酸AUC均有统计学意义的改善:6mwt (p =0.035)、VO2peak (p =0.049)和乳酸AUC (p =0.002)。乳酸AUC (p =0.046)和6MWT (p =0.035),但没有VO2peak显示运动方式在功能工作能力方面的差异。结论:6-MWT和乳酸AUC,而不是vo2峰值,能够显示不同运动方式之间功能能力的统计学显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Blood Lactate AUC Is a Sensitive Test for Evaluating the Effect of Exercise Training on Functional Work Capacity in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.

Blood Lactate AUC Is a Sensitive Test for Evaluating the Effect of Exercise Training on Functional Work Capacity in Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.

Purpose: Exercise training is an essential treatment option for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF). However, it remains controversial, which surrogate measures of functional work capacity are most reliable. The purpose of this paper was to compare functional capacity work measured as capillary lactate concentrations area under the curve (AUC) with standard cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) with VO2peak and the 6-minute walk test (6 MWT).

Methods: Twenty-three patients in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II/III with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <35% were randomised to home-based recommendation of regular exercise (RRE) (controls), moderate continuous training (MCT) or aerobic interval training (AIT). The MCT and AIT groups underwent 12 weeks of supervised exercise training. Exercise testing was performed as standard CPET treadmill test with analysis of VO2peak, the 6 MWT and a novel 30-minute submaximal treadmill test with capillary lactate AUC.

Results: All patients had statistically significant improvements in VO2peak, 6 MWT and lactate AUC after 12 weeks of exercise training: 6 MWT (p =0.035), VO2peak (p =0.049) and lactate AUC (p =0.002). Lactate AUC (p =0.046) and 6MWT (p =0.035), but not VO2peak revealed difference between the exercise modalities regarding functional work capacity.

Conclusion: 6-MWT and lactate AUC, but not VO2peak, were able to reveal a statistically significant improvement in functional capacity between different exercise modalities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: Rehabilitation Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies in all areas of physical medicine and rehabilitation. The journal focuses on improving and restoring functional ability and quality of life to those with physical impairments or disabilities. In addition, articles looking at techniques to assess and study disabling conditions will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信