家庭护理临床能力教育计划的有效性:系统回顾。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Journal of Family Nursing Pub Date : 2021-11-01 Epub Date: 2021-08-21 DOI:10.1177/10748407211038683
Teresa Gutiérrez-Alemán, Nuria Esandi, Miren I Pardavila-Belio, María Pueyo-Garrigues, Navidad Canga-Armayor, Cristina Alfaro-Díaz, Ana Canga-Armayor
{"title":"家庭护理临床能力教育计划的有效性:系统回顾。","authors":"Teresa Gutiérrez-Alemán,&nbsp;Nuria Esandi,&nbsp;Miren I Pardavila-Belio,&nbsp;María Pueyo-Garrigues,&nbsp;Navidad Canga-Armayor,&nbsp;Cristina Alfaro-Díaz,&nbsp;Ana Canga-Armayor","doi":"10.1177/10748407211038683","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Evidence shows that applying family nursing theory to practice benefits the patient, the family, and nursing professionals, yet the implementation of family nursing in clinical practice settings is inconsistent and limited. One of the contributing factors may be related to insufficient or inadequate educational programs focused on family nursing. This article presents a systematic review of the research that has examined the effectiveness of family nursing educational programs aimed at promoting clinical competence in family nursing. Six databases were systematically searched and 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, generating three themes: general study characteristics, educational program components, and outcome measures. These educational programs reported effectiveness in developing family nursing knowledge, skills, and attitudes, but did not evaluate the nurses' actual acquisition and implementation of family nursing clinical competencies. This review offers relevant implications for research and for family nursing education, especially when designing and evaluating future educational programs. Future research must more closely address the process and outcomes of best educational practices in family nursing education and how these are applied and evaluated in actual practice settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":50193,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Nursing","volume":"27 4","pages":"255-274"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Educational Programs for Clinical Competence in Family Nursing: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Teresa Gutiérrez-Alemán,&nbsp;Nuria Esandi,&nbsp;Miren I Pardavila-Belio,&nbsp;María Pueyo-Garrigues,&nbsp;Navidad Canga-Armayor,&nbsp;Cristina Alfaro-Díaz,&nbsp;Ana Canga-Armayor\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10748407211038683\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Evidence shows that applying family nursing theory to practice benefits the patient, the family, and nursing professionals, yet the implementation of family nursing in clinical practice settings is inconsistent and limited. One of the contributing factors may be related to insufficient or inadequate educational programs focused on family nursing. This article presents a systematic review of the research that has examined the effectiveness of family nursing educational programs aimed at promoting clinical competence in family nursing. Six databases were systematically searched and 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, generating three themes: general study characteristics, educational program components, and outcome measures. These educational programs reported effectiveness in developing family nursing knowledge, skills, and attitudes, but did not evaluate the nurses' actual acquisition and implementation of family nursing clinical competencies. This review offers relevant implications for research and for family nursing education, especially when designing and evaluating future educational programs. Future research must more closely address the process and outcomes of best educational practices in family nursing education and how these are applied and evaluated in actual practice settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50193,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Family Nursing\",\"volume\":\"27 4\",\"pages\":\"255-274\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Family Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10748407211038683\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2021/8/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10748407211038683","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

有证据表明,将家庭护理理论应用于实践有利于患者,家庭和护理专业人员,但家庭护理在临床实践环境中的实施是不一致的和有限的。其中一个因素可能与家庭护理教育计划不足或不足有关。这篇文章提出了一个系统的研究综述,研究了家庭护理教育计划的有效性,旨在提高家庭护理的临床能力。系统检索了6个数据库,有14项研究符合纳入标准,产生了三个主题:一般研究特征、教育计划组成部分和结果测量。这些教育计划报告了在发展家庭护理知识、技能和态度方面的有效性,但没有评估护士实际获得和实施家庭护理临床能力。这篇综述为研究和家庭护理教育提供了相关的启示,特别是在设计和评估未来的教育计划时。未来的研究必须更密切地解决家庭护理教育中最佳教育实践的过程和结果,以及这些如何在实际实践环境中应用和评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Educational Programs for Clinical Competence in Family Nursing: A Systematic Review.

Evidence shows that applying family nursing theory to practice benefits the patient, the family, and nursing professionals, yet the implementation of family nursing in clinical practice settings is inconsistent and limited. One of the contributing factors may be related to insufficient or inadequate educational programs focused on family nursing. This article presents a systematic review of the research that has examined the effectiveness of family nursing educational programs aimed at promoting clinical competence in family nursing. Six databases were systematically searched and 14 studies met the inclusion criteria, generating three themes: general study characteristics, educational program components, and outcome measures. These educational programs reported effectiveness in developing family nursing knowledge, skills, and attitudes, but did not evaluate the nurses' actual acquisition and implementation of family nursing clinical competencies. This review offers relevant implications for research and for family nursing education, especially when designing and evaluating future educational programs. Future research must more closely address the process and outcomes of best educational practices in family nursing education and how these are applied and evaluated in actual practice settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
40
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Family Nursing (JFN) is a peer-reviewed, quarterly journal of nursing research, practice, education, and policy issues, as well as empirical and theoretical analyses on the subject of family health. Its interdisciplinary, international, and collaborative perspectives examine cultural diversity and families across the life cycle. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信