自杀欲望和自杀能力的各个方面是否能预测未来的自杀行为?期望-能力假设的纵向检验。

IF 4.6 1区 心理学 Q1 Medicine
Jessica D Ribeiro, Kathryn P Linthicum, Thomas E Joiner, Xieyining Huang, Lauren M Harris, Chloe P Bryen
{"title":"自杀欲望和自杀能力的各个方面是否能预测未来的自杀行为?期望-能力假设的纵向检验。","authors":"Jessica D Ribeiro,&nbsp;Kathryn P Linthicum,&nbsp;Thomas E Joiner,&nbsp;Xieyining Huang,&nbsp;Lauren M Harris,&nbsp;Chloe P Bryen","doi":"10.1037/abn0000595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Capability-based models propose that people die by suicide because they want to, and they can. Despite the intuitive appeal of this hypothesis, longitudinal evidence testing its predictive validity has been limited. This study tested the predictive validity of the desire-capability hypothesis. A total of 1,020 self-injuring and/or suicidal adults were recruited worldwide online from suicide, self-injury, and mental health web forums. After baseline assessment, participants completed follow-up assessments at 3, 14, and 28 days after baseline. Participant retention was high (>90%) across all follow-up assessments. Analyses examined the effect of the statistical interaction between suicidal desire and indices of capability for suicide on future nonfatal suicide attempts. Main analyses focused on the fearlessness about death facet of capability for suicide; exploratory analyses examined preparations for suicide. Logistic regression was used to predict suicide attempt status at follow-up; zero-inflated negative binomial models were implemented to predict the frequency of nonfatal suicide attempts at follow-up. Results were consistent across models, finding very little evidence of the desire-capability interaction as a significant predictor of suicide attempt status or frequency at follow-up. We close with a discussion of the limitations of this study as well as the implications of our findings for future suicide science. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":14793,"journal":{"name":"Journal of abnormal psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do suicidal desire and facets of capability for suicide predict future suicidal behavior? A longitudinal test of the desire-capability hypothesis.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica D Ribeiro,&nbsp;Kathryn P Linthicum,&nbsp;Thomas E Joiner,&nbsp;Xieyining Huang,&nbsp;Lauren M Harris,&nbsp;Chloe P Bryen\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/abn0000595\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Capability-based models propose that people die by suicide because they want to, and they can. Despite the intuitive appeal of this hypothesis, longitudinal evidence testing its predictive validity has been limited. This study tested the predictive validity of the desire-capability hypothesis. A total of 1,020 self-injuring and/or suicidal adults were recruited worldwide online from suicide, self-injury, and mental health web forums. After baseline assessment, participants completed follow-up assessments at 3, 14, and 28 days after baseline. Participant retention was high (>90%) across all follow-up assessments. Analyses examined the effect of the statistical interaction between suicidal desire and indices of capability for suicide on future nonfatal suicide attempts. Main analyses focused on the fearlessness about death facet of capability for suicide; exploratory analyses examined preparations for suicide. Logistic regression was used to predict suicide attempt status at follow-up; zero-inflated negative binomial models were implemented to predict the frequency of nonfatal suicide attempts at follow-up. Results were consistent across models, finding very little evidence of the desire-capability interaction as a significant predictor of suicide attempt status or frequency at follow-up. We close with a discussion of the limitations of this study as well as the implications of our findings for future suicide science. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of abnormal psychology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of abnormal psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000595\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of abnormal psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/abn0000595","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

基于能力的模型认为,人们自杀是因为他们想自杀,而且他们可以自杀。尽管这一假设具有直观的吸引力,但检验其预测有效性的纵向证据有限。本研究检验了欲望-能力假设的预测有效性。共有1020名自残和/或有自杀倾向的成年人在网上从世界各地的自杀、自残和心理健康网络论坛上被招募。基线评估后,参与者在基线后3、14和28天完成随访评估。在所有随访评估中,参与者保留率很高(>90%)。分析了自杀欲望和自杀能力指数之间的统计交互作用对未来非致命性自杀企图的影响。主要分析了自杀能力的“死亡无畏”方面;探索性分析考察了自杀的准备情况。采用Logistic回归预测随访时的自杀企图状态;采用零膨胀负二项模型预测随访时非致命性自杀企图的频率。各个模型的结果是一致的,在随访中发现很少有证据表明欲望-能力相互作用是自杀企图状态或频率的重要预测因子。我们最后讨论了这项研究的局限性,以及我们的发现对未来自杀科学的影响。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do suicidal desire and facets of capability for suicide predict future suicidal behavior? A longitudinal test of the desire-capability hypothesis.

Capability-based models propose that people die by suicide because they want to, and they can. Despite the intuitive appeal of this hypothesis, longitudinal evidence testing its predictive validity has been limited. This study tested the predictive validity of the desire-capability hypothesis. A total of 1,020 self-injuring and/or suicidal adults were recruited worldwide online from suicide, self-injury, and mental health web forums. After baseline assessment, participants completed follow-up assessments at 3, 14, and 28 days after baseline. Participant retention was high (>90%) across all follow-up assessments. Analyses examined the effect of the statistical interaction between suicidal desire and indices of capability for suicide on future nonfatal suicide attempts. Main analyses focused on the fearlessness about death facet of capability for suicide; exploratory analyses examined preparations for suicide. Logistic regression was used to predict suicide attempt status at follow-up; zero-inflated negative binomial models were implemented to predict the frequency of nonfatal suicide attempts at follow-up. Results were consistent across models, finding very little evidence of the desire-capability interaction as a significant predictor of suicide attempt status or frequency at follow-up. We close with a discussion of the limitations of this study as well as the implications of our findings for future suicide science. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Abnormal Psychology® publishes articles on basic research and theory in the broad field of abnormal behavior, its determinants, and its correlates. The following general topics fall within its area of major focus: - psychopathology—its etiology, development, symptomatology, and course; - normal processes in abnormal individuals; - pathological or atypical features of the behavior of normal persons; - experimental studies, with human or animal subjects, relating to disordered emotional behavior or pathology; - sociocultural effects on pathological processes, including the influence of gender and ethnicity; and - tests of hypotheses from psychological theories that relate to abnormal behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信