厌恶条件反射多类别揭示的超范畴恐惧信息。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Cognitive Neuroscience Pub Date : 2021-01-01 Epub Date: 2020-11-01 DOI:10.1080/17588928.2020.1839039
Seth M Levine, Miriam Kumpf, Rainer Rupprecht, Jens V Schwarzbach
{"title":"厌恶条件反射多类别揭示的超范畴恐惧信息。","authors":"Seth M Levine,&nbsp;Miriam Kumpf,&nbsp;Rainer Rupprecht,&nbsp;Jens V Schwarzbach","doi":"10.1080/17588928.2020.1839039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fear-generalization is a critical function for survival, in which an organism extracts information from a specific instantiation of a threat (e.g., the western diamondback rattlesnake in my front yard on Sunday) and learns to fear - and accordingly respond to - pertinent higher-order information (e.g., snakes live in my yard). Previous work investigating fear-conditioning in humans has used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to demonstrate that activity patterns representing stimuli from an aversively-conditioned category (CS+) are more similar to each other than those of a neutral category (CS-). Here we used fMRI and <i>multiple</i> aversively-conditioned categories to ask whether we would find only similarity increases <i>within</i> the CS+ categories or also similarity increases <i>between</i> the CS+ categories. Using representational similarity analysis, we correlated several models to activity patterns underlying different brain regions and found that, following fear-conditioning, between-category and within-category similarity increased for the CS+ categories in the insula, superior frontal gyrus (SFG), and the right temporal pole. When specifically investigating fear-<i>generalization</i>, these between- and within-category effects were detected in the SFG. These results advance prior pattern-based neuroimaging work by exploring the effect of aversively-conditioning multiple categories and indicate an extended role for such regions in potentially representing supracategorical information during fear-learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":10413,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17588928.2020.1839039","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supracategorical fear information revealed by aversively conditioning multiple categories.\",\"authors\":\"Seth M Levine,&nbsp;Miriam Kumpf,&nbsp;Rainer Rupprecht,&nbsp;Jens V Schwarzbach\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17588928.2020.1839039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Fear-generalization is a critical function for survival, in which an organism extracts information from a specific instantiation of a threat (e.g., the western diamondback rattlesnake in my front yard on Sunday) and learns to fear - and accordingly respond to - pertinent higher-order information (e.g., snakes live in my yard). Previous work investigating fear-conditioning in humans has used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to demonstrate that activity patterns representing stimuli from an aversively-conditioned category (CS+) are more similar to each other than those of a neutral category (CS-). Here we used fMRI and <i>multiple</i> aversively-conditioned categories to ask whether we would find only similarity increases <i>within</i> the CS+ categories or also similarity increases <i>between</i> the CS+ categories. Using representational similarity analysis, we correlated several models to activity patterns underlying different brain regions and found that, following fear-conditioning, between-category and within-category similarity increased for the CS+ categories in the insula, superior frontal gyrus (SFG), and the right temporal pole. When specifically investigating fear-<i>generalization</i>, these between- and within-category effects were detected in the SFG. These results advance prior pattern-based neuroimaging work by exploring the effect of aversively-conditioning multiple categories and indicate an extended role for such regions in potentially representing supracategorical information during fear-learning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17588928.2020.1839039\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cognitive Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2020.1839039\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/11/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2020.1839039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/11/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

恐惧泛化是生存的关键功能,生物体从威胁的具体实例中提取信息(例如,周日我家前院的西部菱形响尾蛇),并学会恐惧——并相应地对相关的高阶信息做出反应(例如,我家院子里住着蛇)。先前研究人类恐惧条件反射的工作使用了功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)来证明,来自负面条件类别(CS+)的刺激的活动模式比来自中性类别(CS-)的刺激更相似。在这里,我们使用功能磁共振成像和多个反向条件类别来询问我们是否会发现只有CS+类别内的相似性增加,还是CS+类别之间的相似性增加。利用表征相似性分析,我们将几个模型与不同脑区活动模式相关联,发现在恐惧条件反射之后,CS+类别在脑岛、额上回和右颞极的类别间和类别内相似性增加。当专门研究恐惧泛化时,这些类别间和类别内效应在SFG中被检测到。这些结果通过探索多类别的负面条件反射效应,推进了基于先验模式的神经成像工作,并表明这些区域在恐惧学习过程中潜在地代表超分类信息方面的扩展作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Supracategorical fear information revealed by aversively conditioning multiple categories.

Fear-generalization is a critical function for survival, in which an organism extracts information from a specific instantiation of a threat (e.g., the western diamondback rattlesnake in my front yard on Sunday) and learns to fear - and accordingly respond to - pertinent higher-order information (e.g., snakes live in my yard). Previous work investigating fear-conditioning in humans has used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to demonstrate that activity patterns representing stimuli from an aversively-conditioned category (CS+) are more similar to each other than those of a neutral category (CS-). Here we used fMRI and multiple aversively-conditioned categories to ask whether we would find only similarity increases within the CS+ categories or also similarity increases between the CS+ categories. Using representational similarity analysis, we correlated several models to activity patterns underlying different brain regions and found that, following fear-conditioning, between-category and within-category similarity increased for the CS+ categories in the insula, superior frontal gyrus (SFG), and the right temporal pole. When specifically investigating fear-generalization, these between- and within-category effects were detected in the SFG. These results advance prior pattern-based neuroimaging work by exploring the effect of aversively-conditioning multiple categories and indicate an extended role for such regions in potentially representing supracategorical information during fear-learning.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cognitive Neuroscience
Cognitive Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive Neuroscience publishes high quality discussion papers and empirical papers on any topic in the field of cognitive neuroscience including perception, attention, memory, language, action, social cognition, and executive function. The journal covers findings based on a variety of techniques such as fMRI, ERPs, MEG, TMS, and focal lesion studies. Contributions that employ or discuss multiple techniques to shed light on the spatial-temporal brain mechanisms underlying a cognitive process are encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信