María Dolores López-Bravo, María Dolores Zamarrón-Cassinello, Roy La Touche, Rosa Muñoz-Plata, Ferran Cuenca-Martínez, Mónica Ramos-Toro
{"title":"与髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎患者功能障碍相关的心理因素。","authors":"María Dolores López-Bravo, María Dolores Zamarrón-Cassinello, Roy La Touche, Rosa Muñoz-Plata, Ferran Cuenca-Martínez, Mónica Ramos-Toro","doi":"10.1080/08964289.2020.1813682","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Several studies have shown an association between psychosocial variables and functional capacity in chronic pain processes such as osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to test a structural equations model that shows the predictive weight of certain variables such as catastrophizing, self-efficacy and kinesiophobia on functional pain and WOMAC subscales scores of pain and physical function of older patients diagnosed with hip and knee osteoarthritis. We also assessed the specific weight of age in terms of the factors. The study was conducted on a sample of 170 patients (142 women and 28 men mean age, 74.44 years range, 50-96 years). The main variables evaluated were WOMAC subscales scores of pain and physical function, self-efficacy, catastrophizing and kinesiophobia. To assess these variables, we used the Spanish validated version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities questionnaire, the Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, respectively. We tested a structural equations model (IBM SPSS Amos version 22). The results showed the predominant predictive weight (both direct and indirect) of catastrophizing while simultaneously ruling out the relevance of age as a predictor of WOMAC subscales scores of pain and physical function. This study provides data of interest on the explanatory mechanisms that underlie the direct and inverse relationships between the studied psychological variables.</p>","PeriodicalId":55395,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Medicine","volume":"47 4","pages":"285-295"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08964289.2020.1813682","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Psychological Factors Associated with Functional Disability in Patients with Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis.\",\"authors\":\"María Dolores López-Bravo, María Dolores Zamarrón-Cassinello, Roy La Touche, Rosa Muñoz-Plata, Ferran Cuenca-Martínez, Mónica Ramos-Toro\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08964289.2020.1813682\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Several studies have shown an association between psychosocial variables and functional capacity in chronic pain processes such as osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to test a structural equations model that shows the predictive weight of certain variables such as catastrophizing, self-efficacy and kinesiophobia on functional pain and WOMAC subscales scores of pain and physical function of older patients diagnosed with hip and knee osteoarthritis. We also assessed the specific weight of age in terms of the factors. The study was conducted on a sample of 170 patients (142 women and 28 men mean age, 74.44 years range, 50-96 years). The main variables evaluated were WOMAC subscales scores of pain and physical function, self-efficacy, catastrophizing and kinesiophobia. To assess these variables, we used the Spanish validated version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities questionnaire, the Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, respectively. We tested a structural equations model (IBM SPSS Amos version 22). The results showed the predominant predictive weight (both direct and indirect) of catastrophizing while simultaneously ruling out the relevance of age as a predictor of WOMAC subscales scores of pain and physical function. This study provides data of interest on the explanatory mechanisms that underlie the direct and inverse relationships between the studied psychological variables.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behavioral Medicine\",\"volume\":\"47 4\",\"pages\":\"285-295\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/08964289.2020.1813682\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behavioral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2020.1813682\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2020/9/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2020.1813682","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2020/9/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12
摘要
一些研究表明,在骨关节炎等慢性疼痛过程中,社会心理变量与功能能力之间存在关联。本研究的目的是检验一个结构方程模型,该模型显示了某些变量(如灾难化、自我效能和运动恐惧症)对功能性疼痛的预测权重,以及诊断为髋关节和膝关节骨关节炎的老年患者的疼痛和身体功能的WOMAC亚量表评分。我们还根据这些因素评估了年龄的比重。该研究的样本为170例患者(142例女性,28例男性,平均年龄74.44岁,范围50-96岁)。评估的主要变量为疼痛和身体功能、自我效能、灾难化和运动恐惧症的WOMAC分量表得分。为了评估这些变量,我们分别使用了西安大略大学和麦克马斯特大学的西班牙语验证版问卷、慢性疼痛自我效能量表、疼痛灾难化量表和坦帕运动恐惧症量表。我们测试了一个结构方程模型(IBM SPSS Amos version 22)。结果显示了灾难化的主要预测权重(直接和间接),同时排除了年龄作为WOMAC亚量表疼痛和身体功能评分预测因子的相关性。本研究提供了有关心理变量之间直接和反向关系的解释机制的数据。
Psychological Factors Associated with Functional Disability in Patients with Hip and Knee Osteoarthritis.
Several studies have shown an association between psychosocial variables and functional capacity in chronic pain processes such as osteoarthritis. The aim of this study was to test a structural equations model that shows the predictive weight of certain variables such as catastrophizing, self-efficacy and kinesiophobia on functional pain and WOMAC subscales scores of pain and physical function of older patients diagnosed with hip and knee osteoarthritis. We also assessed the specific weight of age in terms of the factors. The study was conducted on a sample of 170 patients (142 women and 28 men mean age, 74.44 years range, 50-96 years). The main variables evaluated were WOMAC subscales scores of pain and physical function, self-efficacy, catastrophizing and kinesiophobia. To assess these variables, we used the Spanish validated version of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities questionnaire, the Chronic Pain Self-Efficacy Scale, the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, respectively. We tested a structural equations model (IBM SPSS Amos version 22). The results showed the predominant predictive weight (both direct and indirect) of catastrophizing while simultaneously ruling out the relevance of age as a predictor of WOMAC subscales scores of pain and physical function. This study provides data of interest on the explanatory mechanisms that underlie the direct and inverse relationships between the studied psychological variables.
期刊介绍:
Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal, which fosters and promotes the exchange of knowledge and the advancement of theory in the field of behavioral medicine, including but not limited to understandings of disease prevention, health promotion, health disparities, identification of health risk factors, and interventions designed to reduce health risks, ameliorate health disparities, enhancing all aspects of health. The journal seeks to advance knowledge and theory in these domains in all segments of the population and across the lifespan, in local, national, and global contexts, and with an emphasis on the synergies that exist between biological, psychological, psychosocial, and structural factors as they related to these areas of study and across health states.
Behavioral Medicine publishes original empirical studies (experimental and observational research studies, quantitative and qualitative studies, evaluation studies) as well as clinical/case studies. The journal also publishes review articles, which provide systematic evaluations of the literature and propose alternative and innovative theoretical paradigms, as well as brief reports and responses to articles previously published in Behavioral Medicine.