FSCJ 研讨会 "开发改进人类风险评估方法的未来挑战和机遇 "总结报告。

Food safety (Tokyo, Japan) Pub Date : 2019-11-22 eCollection Date: 2019-12-01 DOI:10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.2018017
Kaoruko Tachibana, George E N Kass, Atsushi Ono, Takashi Yamada, Weida Tong, Daniel R Doerge, Yasushi Yamazoe
{"title":"FSCJ 研讨会 \"开发改进人类风险评估方法的未来挑战和机遇 \"总结报告。","authors":"Kaoruko Tachibana, George E N Kass, Atsushi Ono, Takashi Yamada, Weida Tong, Daniel R Doerge, Yasushi Yamazoe","doi":"10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.2018017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This is a summary report of FSCJ (Food Safety Commission of Japan) workshop entitled \"Future Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Methodologies for Improved Human Risk Assessments, which held in November 2018. Scientific advancements have facilitated the development of new methods for chemical risk assessments with the expansion of toxicological databases. They are promising tools to overcome challenges, such as situations of data insufficiency, estimation of internal exposure and prediction of hazard, and enable us to improve our human health risk assessment in food safety. In this review, current understandings on developments in chemical risk assessments, especially focusing on Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) approach, non-testing and <i>in-silico</i> approaches (e.g. read-across), and physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) modeling are discussed as possible promising tools. It also discusses future challenges and opportunities regarding social environment buildings in which all stakeholders including scientific experts, risk managers and consumers are able to accept these new risk assessment technologies. International collaboration would increase and enhance the efficiency in forming innovative ideas and in translating them into regulatory practices. It would strengthen technical capacity of experts who contribute to regulatory decisions and also promote acceptance of new methodologies among stakeholders. Cross-sectional collaboration such as making good use of human data of pharmaceutical drugs will facilitate a development of fresh tools for food safety domains. Once a new methodology is recognized in risk assessment agencies as implementable, it needs to be acknowledged and accepted by wider range of different stakeholders. Such stakeholders include scientific experts who conduct risk assessment for the risk assessment agencies, food industries and consumers. Transparency in the risk assessment work performed by regulatory agencies should strengthen their credibility and promote the acceptance of risk assessment including the new methodologies used in it. At the same time, efforts should be continued by regulatory agencies to further communicate with consumers about the concept of risk-based assessment as well as the concept of uncertainty.</p>","PeriodicalId":73044,"journal":{"name":"Food safety (Tokyo, Japan)","volume":"7 4","pages":"83-89"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6957455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Summary Report of FSCJ Workshop \\\"Future Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Methodologies for Improved Human Risk Assessments\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Kaoruko Tachibana, George E N Kass, Atsushi Ono, Takashi Yamada, Weida Tong, Daniel R Doerge, Yasushi Yamazoe\",\"doi\":\"10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.2018017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This is a summary report of FSCJ (Food Safety Commission of Japan) workshop entitled \\\"Future Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Methodologies for Improved Human Risk Assessments, which held in November 2018. Scientific advancements have facilitated the development of new methods for chemical risk assessments with the expansion of toxicological databases. They are promising tools to overcome challenges, such as situations of data insufficiency, estimation of internal exposure and prediction of hazard, and enable us to improve our human health risk assessment in food safety. In this review, current understandings on developments in chemical risk assessments, especially focusing on Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) approach, non-testing and <i>in-silico</i> approaches (e.g. read-across), and physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) modeling are discussed as possible promising tools. It also discusses future challenges and opportunities regarding social environment buildings in which all stakeholders including scientific experts, risk managers and consumers are able to accept these new risk assessment technologies. International collaboration would increase and enhance the efficiency in forming innovative ideas and in translating them into regulatory practices. It would strengthen technical capacity of experts who contribute to regulatory decisions and also promote acceptance of new methodologies among stakeholders. Cross-sectional collaboration such as making good use of human data of pharmaceutical drugs will facilitate a development of fresh tools for food safety domains. Once a new methodology is recognized in risk assessment agencies as implementable, it needs to be acknowledged and accepted by wider range of different stakeholders. Such stakeholders include scientific experts who conduct risk assessment for the risk assessment agencies, food industries and consumers. Transparency in the risk assessment work performed by regulatory agencies should strengthen their credibility and promote the acceptance of risk assessment including the new methodologies used in it. At the same time, efforts should be continued by regulatory agencies to further communicate with consumers about the concept of risk-based assessment as well as the concept of uncertainty.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food safety (Tokyo, Japan)\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"83-89\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6957455/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food safety (Tokyo, Japan)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.2018017\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2019/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food safety (Tokyo, Japan)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14252/foodsafetyfscj.2018017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2019/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文是2018年11月举行的FSCJ(日本食品安全委员会)研讨会的总结报告,题为 "开发改进人类风险评估方法的未来挑战和机遇"。随着毒理学数据库的扩大,科学进步促进了化学风险评估新方法的发展。它们是克服数据不足、内部暴露估计和危害预测等挑战的有前途的工具,使我们能够改进食品安全中的人类健康风险评估。在这篇综述中,讨论了目前对化学品风险评估发展的理解,尤其侧重于毒理学关注阈值(TTC)方法、非测试和硅学方法(如读取交叉),以及基于生理的药物动力学(PBPK)建模,将其作为可能的有前途的工具。报告还讨论了未来在社会环境建设方面的挑战和机遇,在社会环境建设中,包括科学专家、风险管理者和消费者在内的所有利益相关者都能接受这些新的风险评估技术。国际合作将提高形成创新理念并将其转化为监管实践的效率。国际合作将加强参与监管决策的专家的技术能力,并促进利益相关者接受新方法。跨部门合作,如充分利用人类的药品数据,将有助于为食品安全领域开发新的工具。一旦风险评估机构认为新方法可以实施,就需要得到更多不同利益相关者的认可和接受。这些利益相关者包括为风险评估机构进行风险评估的科学专家、食品工业和消费者。监管机构风险评估工作的透明度应能提高其可信度,促进对风险评估包括评估中使用的新方法的接受。同时,监管机构应继续努力,进一步向消费者宣传基于风险的评估概念和不确定性概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Summary Report of FSCJ Workshop "Future Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Methodologies for Improved Human Risk Assessments".

This is a summary report of FSCJ (Food Safety Commission of Japan) workshop entitled "Future Challenges and Opportunities in Developing Methodologies for Improved Human Risk Assessments, which held in November 2018. Scientific advancements have facilitated the development of new methods for chemical risk assessments with the expansion of toxicological databases. They are promising tools to overcome challenges, such as situations of data insufficiency, estimation of internal exposure and prediction of hazard, and enable us to improve our human health risk assessment in food safety. In this review, current understandings on developments in chemical risk assessments, especially focusing on Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) approach, non-testing and in-silico approaches (e.g. read-across), and physiologically based pharmacokinetics (PBPK) modeling are discussed as possible promising tools. It also discusses future challenges and opportunities regarding social environment buildings in which all stakeholders including scientific experts, risk managers and consumers are able to accept these new risk assessment technologies. International collaboration would increase and enhance the efficiency in forming innovative ideas and in translating them into regulatory practices. It would strengthen technical capacity of experts who contribute to regulatory decisions and also promote acceptance of new methodologies among stakeholders. Cross-sectional collaboration such as making good use of human data of pharmaceutical drugs will facilitate a development of fresh tools for food safety domains. Once a new methodology is recognized in risk assessment agencies as implementable, it needs to be acknowledged and accepted by wider range of different stakeholders. Such stakeholders include scientific experts who conduct risk assessment for the risk assessment agencies, food industries and consumers. Transparency in the risk assessment work performed by regulatory agencies should strengthen their credibility and promote the acceptance of risk assessment including the new methodologies used in it. At the same time, efforts should be continued by regulatory agencies to further communicate with consumers about the concept of risk-based assessment as well as the concept of uncertainty.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信