阿尔茨海默病相关的皮质萎缩在中国人和白人之间没有差异。

Jia Fan, Marian Tse, Jessie S Carr, Bruce L Miller, Joel H Kramer, Howard J Rosen, Luke W Bonham, Jennifer S Yokoyama
{"title":"阿尔茨海默病相关的皮质萎缩在中国人和白人之间没有差异。","authors":"Jia Fan,&nbsp;Marian Tse,&nbsp;Jessie S Carr,&nbsp;Bruce L Miller,&nbsp;Joel H Kramer,&nbsp;Howard J Rosen,&nbsp;Luke W Bonham,&nbsp;Jennifer S Yokoyama","doi":"10.1097/WAD.0000000000000315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess whether there are differences in Alzheimer disease (AD)-associated atrophy regions in Chinese and white patients with AD versus cognitively normal older adults, and to test whether associations between clinical severity and gray matter volume are similar or different across these ethnic groups in a cross-sectional analysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Chinese and white patients with AD, individuals with mild cognitive impairment, and cognitively normal controls (46 white and 48 Chinese) were clinically evaluated at an academic center within 1 year of magnetic resonance imaging acquisition. Clinical severity was assessed using the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes and cortical atrophy was measured using voxel-based morphometry as well as Freesurfer. Chinese and white cohorts were demographically matched for age, sex, and education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical severity by diagnosis was similar across ethnicities. Chinese and white patient groups showed similar amounts of atrophy in the regions most affected in AD after accounting for demographic variables and head size. There was no significant difference between ethnic groups when compared by atrophy and clinical severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that Chinese and white patients with AD, when matched demographically, are clinically and neuroanatomically similar on normalized measures of cortical atrophy and clinical severity.</p>","PeriodicalId":520551,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer disease and associated disorders","volume":" ","pages":"186-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000315","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alzheimer Disease-associated Cortical Atrophy Does not Differ Between Chinese and Whites.\",\"authors\":\"Jia Fan,&nbsp;Marian Tse,&nbsp;Jessie S Carr,&nbsp;Bruce L Miller,&nbsp;Joel H Kramer,&nbsp;Howard J Rosen,&nbsp;Luke W Bonham,&nbsp;Jennifer S Yokoyama\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/WAD.0000000000000315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess whether there are differences in Alzheimer disease (AD)-associated atrophy regions in Chinese and white patients with AD versus cognitively normal older adults, and to test whether associations between clinical severity and gray matter volume are similar or different across these ethnic groups in a cross-sectional analysis.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Chinese and white patients with AD, individuals with mild cognitive impairment, and cognitively normal controls (46 white and 48 Chinese) were clinically evaluated at an academic center within 1 year of magnetic resonance imaging acquisition. Clinical severity was assessed using the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes and cortical atrophy was measured using voxel-based morphometry as well as Freesurfer. Chinese and white cohorts were demographically matched for age, sex, and education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Clinical severity by diagnosis was similar across ethnicities. Chinese and white patient groups showed similar amounts of atrophy in the regions most affected in AD after accounting for demographic variables and head size. There was no significant difference between ethnic groups when compared by atrophy and clinical severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that Chinese and white patients with AD, when matched demographically, are clinically and neuroanatomically similar on normalized measures of cortical atrophy and clinical severity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520551,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer disease and associated disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"186-193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000315\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer disease and associated disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer disease and associated disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WAD.0000000000000315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:通过横断面分析,评估中国和白人老年痴呆症患者与认知正常的老年人相比,阿尔茨海默病(AD)相关的萎缩区域是否存在差异,并测试临床严重程度和灰质体积之间的关联在这些种族群体中是否相似或不同。材料和方法:在一个学术中心对华人和白人AD患者、轻度认知障碍患者和认知正常对照(46名白人和48名华人)进行临床评估,时间为磁共振成像获取后1年内。临床严重程度采用临床痴呆评分盒和评估,皮质萎缩程度采用基于体素的形态测量和Freesurfer测量。华人和白人在年龄、性别和受教育程度上是匹配的。结果:不同种族诊断的临床严重程度相似。在考虑人口统计学变量和头部大小后,中国和白人患者组在AD最受影响的区域显示出相似的萎缩量。在萎缩和临床严重程度方面,不同种族间无显著差异。结论:我们的研究表明,当人口统计学匹配时,中国和白人AD患者在皮层萎缩和临床严重程度的标准化测量上在临床和神经解剖学上相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Alzheimer Disease-associated Cortical Atrophy Does not Differ Between Chinese and Whites.

Alzheimer Disease-associated Cortical Atrophy Does not Differ Between Chinese and Whites.

Alzheimer Disease-associated Cortical Atrophy Does not Differ Between Chinese and Whites.

Alzheimer Disease-associated Cortical Atrophy Does not Differ Between Chinese and Whites.

Purpose: To assess whether there are differences in Alzheimer disease (AD)-associated atrophy regions in Chinese and white patients with AD versus cognitively normal older adults, and to test whether associations between clinical severity and gray matter volume are similar or different across these ethnic groups in a cross-sectional analysis.

Materials and methods: Chinese and white patients with AD, individuals with mild cognitive impairment, and cognitively normal controls (46 white and 48 Chinese) were clinically evaluated at an academic center within 1 year of magnetic resonance imaging acquisition. Clinical severity was assessed using the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes and cortical atrophy was measured using voxel-based morphometry as well as Freesurfer. Chinese and white cohorts were demographically matched for age, sex, and education.

Results: Clinical severity by diagnosis was similar across ethnicities. Chinese and white patient groups showed similar amounts of atrophy in the regions most affected in AD after accounting for demographic variables and head size. There was no significant difference between ethnic groups when compared by atrophy and clinical severity.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that Chinese and white patients with AD, when matched demographically, are clinically and neuroanatomically similar on normalized measures of cortical atrophy and clinical severity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信