多囊卵巢综合征的专科诊断和治疗趋势。

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine
生殖医学杂志 Pub Date : 2016-09-01
Nicole Uliassi, Shannon Sullivan, Lauren Damle, Veronica Gomez-Lobo
{"title":"多囊卵巢综合征的专科诊断和治疗趋势。","authors":"Nicole Uliassi,&nbsp;Shannon Sullivan,&nbsp;Lauren Damle,&nbsp;Veronica Gomez-Lobo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify trends in the diagnostic work- up of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) performed by specialists in general medicine, endocrinology, and gynecology.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Ret- rospective electronic chart review of adolescents and young women whose workup for PCOS was initiated by specialists in endocrinology, general medicine, or gyne- cology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 530 charts reviewed, 84 patients quali- fied for inclusion. Approximately two-thirds of patients seen by generalists and endocrinologists had lipid test- ing done; no gynecologist in this study ordered lipid tests. Cortisol levels and markers of congenital adrenal hyperplasia were more often ordered for patients seen by endocrinologists than for those seen by generalists or gynecologists. There was no significant difference among specialties in the use of diagnostic criteria for PCOS, including menstrual irregularity, hyperandrogenism, ovarian imaging, or exclusion of other etiologies. Women seen by endocrinologists tended to be prescribed met- formin more often; however, there was no significant difference in the use of hormonal contraceptives, piogli- tazone, and spironolactone among specialties.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Across 3 clinical practice specialties commonly evaluating menstrual irregularity and/or hirsutism in young women, patients were consistently diagnosed with PCOS based on appropriate, clinically- accepted criteria. However, no patients seen by gyne- cologists received lipid test- ing, which is considered an important screening study for cardiovascular disease risk in this population.</p>","PeriodicalId":50063,"journal":{"name":"生殖医学杂志","volume":"61 9-10","pages":"441-446"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trends, in Diagnosis and Treatment of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome by Specialty.\",\"authors\":\"Nicole Uliassi,&nbsp;Shannon Sullivan,&nbsp;Lauren Damle,&nbsp;Veronica Gomez-Lobo\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify trends in the diagnostic work- up of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) performed by specialists in general medicine, endocrinology, and gynecology.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Ret- rospective electronic chart review of adolescents and young women whose workup for PCOS was initiated by specialists in endocrinology, general medicine, or gyne- cology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 530 charts reviewed, 84 patients quali- fied for inclusion. Approximately two-thirds of patients seen by generalists and endocrinologists had lipid test- ing done; no gynecologist in this study ordered lipid tests. Cortisol levels and markers of congenital adrenal hyperplasia were more often ordered for patients seen by endocrinologists than for those seen by generalists or gynecologists. There was no significant difference among specialties in the use of diagnostic criteria for PCOS, including menstrual irregularity, hyperandrogenism, ovarian imaging, or exclusion of other etiologies. Women seen by endocrinologists tended to be prescribed met- formin more often; however, there was no significant difference in the use of hormonal contraceptives, piogli- tazone, and spironolactone among specialties.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Across 3 clinical practice specialties commonly evaluating menstrual irregularity and/or hirsutism in young women, patients were consistently diagnosed with PCOS based on appropriate, clinically- accepted criteria. However, no patients seen by gyne- cologists received lipid test- ing, which is considered an important screening study for cardiovascular disease risk in this population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50063,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"生殖医学杂志\",\"volume\":\"61 9-10\",\"pages\":\"441-446\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"生殖医学杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"生殖医学杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:了解多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)在全科、内分泌科和妇科专家诊断中的发展趋势。研究设计:对由内分泌学、普通医学或妇科专家发起的多囊卵巢综合征检查的青少年和年轻女性进行回顾性电子图表回顾。结果:在530份病历中,84例患者符合纳入标准。大约三分之二的全科医生和内分泌科医生都做过血脂测试;本研究中没有妇科医生要求进行脂质测试。与全科医生或妇科医生相比,内分泌科医生对患者的皮质醇水平和先天性肾上腺增生标志物的要求更高。在使用多囊卵巢综合征的诊断标准,包括月经不调、雄激素过多、卵巢显像或排除其他病因方面,各专科之间没有显著差异。看内分泌科医生的女性往往更常开双胍处方;然而,各专科在激素避孕药、吡格里他酮和螺内酯的使用上没有显著差异。结论:在评估年轻女性月经不规律和/或多毛症的3个临床实践专业中,基于适当的、临床接受的标准,患者被一致诊断为多囊卵巢综合征。然而,妇科医生所见的患者没有接受脂质检测,这被认为是该人群心血管疾病风险的重要筛查研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Trends, in Diagnosis and Treatment of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome by Specialty.

Objective: To identify trends in the diagnostic work- up of polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) performed by specialists in general medicine, endocrinology, and gynecology.

Study design: Ret- rospective electronic chart review of adolescents and young women whose workup for PCOS was initiated by specialists in endocrinology, general medicine, or gyne- cology.

Results: Of 530 charts reviewed, 84 patients quali- fied for inclusion. Approximately two-thirds of patients seen by generalists and endocrinologists had lipid test- ing done; no gynecologist in this study ordered lipid tests. Cortisol levels and markers of congenital adrenal hyperplasia were more often ordered for patients seen by endocrinologists than for those seen by generalists or gynecologists. There was no significant difference among specialties in the use of diagnostic criteria for PCOS, including menstrual irregularity, hyperandrogenism, ovarian imaging, or exclusion of other etiologies. Women seen by endocrinologists tended to be prescribed met- formin more often; however, there was no significant difference in the use of hormonal contraceptives, piogli- tazone, and spironolactone among specialties.

Conclusion: Across 3 clinical practice specialties commonly evaluating menstrual irregularity and/or hirsutism in young women, patients were consistently diagnosed with PCOS based on appropriate, clinically- accepted criteria. However, no patients seen by gyne- cologists received lipid test- ing, which is considered an important screening study for cardiovascular disease risk in this population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
生殖医学杂志
生殖医学杂志 医学-妇产科学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6427
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Reproductive Medicine® has been the essential tool of Obstetricians and Gynecologists since 1968. As a highly regarded professional journal and the official periodical of six medical associations, JRM® brings timely and relevant information on the latest procedures and advances in the field of reproductive medicine. Published bimonthly, JRM® contains peer-reviewed articles and case reports submitted by top specialists. Common topics include research, clinical practice, and case reports related to general obstetrics and gynecology, infertility, female cancers, gynecologic surgery, contraception, and medical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信